Free AANP FNP Practice Test
This free AANP FNP practice test has 50 original questions, each with an explanation for every answer choice, free and with no signup. They're written for the NPCB (AANPCB) Family Nurse Practitioner exam, the one most people call the AANP FNP exam, and they're unofficial practice, not real exam items.
Question 1 of 50
Assess · Middle adult
A 52-year-old man wants a sports physical before joining a recreational soccer league. He has no known medical conditions and takes no medications. After 5 minutes of seated rest, his blood pressure is 138/86 mm Hg. A second reading at the same visit is 136/84 mm Hg. No earlier elevated readings are on record. What is the most appropriate next step?
A. Diagnose stage 1 hypertension and start lisinopril
B. Confirm with home or ambulatory blood pressure monitoring before diagnosing hypertension
C. Order an echocardiogram to look for left ventricular hypertrophy before making any diagnosis
D. Tell him readings under 140/90 mm Hg are normal and no follow-up is needed
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Confirm with home or ambulatory blood pressure monitoring before diagnosing hypertension
Two readings at one visit aren't enough to label someone with hypertension. The USPSTF recommends confirming an elevated office reading with measurements taken outside the clinic before treatment starts. It treats ambulatory monitoring as the reference standard, with home monitoring as an alternative. Out-of-office readings also catch white-coat hypertension, which office readings can't separate from sustained high blood pressure.
Why not A: It skips confirmation. And even once stage 1 is confirmed, the 2025 AHA/ACC guideline starts adults with PREVENT 10-year risk under 7.5% and no cardiovascular disease, previous stroke, diabetes, or CKD on 3 to 6 months of lifestyle change, adding medicine if blood pressure stays at or above 130/80 mm Hg.
Why not C: An echocardiogram looks at the heart. It can't tell you whether his blood pressure is persistently high outside the office, which is the question in front of you.
Why not D: Under the ACC/AHA categories, 130–139/80–89 mm Hg is stage 1 hypertension, not normal. These readings need confirmation and follow-up.
Rule to remember: For routine elevated office readings like these, confirm outside the office before diagnosing or treating hypertension.
Sources: USPSTF: Hypertension in Adults: Screening (2021) — April 27, 2021; Clinician Summary; Screening Tests; AHA: Top Things to Know, 2025 High Blood Pressure Guideline — 2025 guideline summary; Blood pressure categories; medication thresholds; lower-risk lifestyle trial.
How to use this set: answer each question before you open its explanation. To practice at exam pace, give yourself 60 minutes for all 50 questions, which is 72 seconds each, the same pace as the real exam. The answer key for self-scoring comes after Question 50.
Question 2 of 50
Diagnose · Older adult
An 82-year-old woman is brought in by her daughter for 2 days of confusion that comes and goes and is worse at night. Last week she managed her own finances without help. Today she can't say the months of the year backward, and her conversation jumps illogically from one subject to another. Five days ago she started oxybutynin for urge incontinence. What is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Alzheimer disease
B. Major depressive disorder
C. Normal age-related cognitive change
D. Delirium
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Delirium
The Confusion Assessment Method identifies delirium when there is an acute onset or fluctuating course and inattention, plus either disorganized thinking or an altered level of consciousness. She meets that pattern: a fluctuating 2-day change, inattention (she can't do months backward), and disorganized conversation. A possible trigger is in the history. Oxybutynin is a strongly anticholinergic drug, and the AGS Beers Criteria warn that anticholinergic exposure raises the risk of delirium in older adults. Assess promptly for other causes as well, including infection or metabolic illness.
Why not A: Dementia develops over months to years, and attention is usually preserved early on. A change over 2 days in someone who managed her finances last week points away from it.
Why not B: Depression can slow thinking, but it doesn't cause an abrupt, fluctuating loss of attention over 2 days.
Why not C: Normal aging doesn't cause a sudden drop in function or attention that comes and goes.
Rule to remember: Acute, fluctuating confusion with inattention: suspect delirium and look promptly for causes, including new medicines.
Sources: Confusion Assessment Method: HIGN clinical instrument — CAM author-copyright 2003; hosted clinical-instrument copy; PDF page 2: CAM diagnostic algorithm; American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated Beers Criteria — May 4, 2023; First-generation antihistamines; delirium/anticholinergics; strong-anticholinergic table.
Question 3 of 50
Plan · Young adult
A 22-year-old woman has had dysuria, urinary frequency, and urgency for 2 days. She is afebrile and has no flank pain, costovertebral angle tenderness, or vaginal discharge. A urine pregnancy test is negative. Her kidney function is normal, she has no drug allergies, and she hasn't taken antibiotics in the past 3 months. Local resistance data aren't available. Which treatment is most appropriate?
A. Nitrofurantoin monohydrate/macrocrystals 100 mg twice daily for 5 days
B. Ciprofloxacin 250 mg twice daily for 3 days
C. Amoxicillin 500 mg three times daily for 7 days
D. Ceftriaxone 500 mg intramuscularly once plus doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 7 days
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Nitrofurantoin monohydrate/macrocrystals 100 mg twice daily for 5 days
This is acute uncomplicated cystitis in a healthy, nonpregnant, premenopausal woman. CDC lists nitrofurantoin, TMP-SMX (where local resistance is under 20%), and fosfomycin as appropriate first-line agents. A 5-day course of nitrofurantoin is the standard IDSA regimen, and it's a sound choice when you don't know local TMP-SMX resistance.
Why not B: It works, but CDC says fluoroquinolones should be reserved for situations where other agents aren't appropriate. A first-line agent is available here.
Why not C: Amoxicillin isn't among CDC's first-line agents for uncomplicated cystitis.
Why not D: That combination targets sexually transmitted infection rather than routine uncomplicated cystitis. The case does not establish an indication for it; absence of vaginal discharge by itself does not exclude an STI.
Rule to remember: Uncomplicated cystitis: choose a first-line agent and save fluoroquinolones.
Sources: CDC: Outpatient Clinical Care for Adults — April 16, 2024; Acute uncomplicated cystitis; IDSA/ESCMID acute uncomplicated cystitis guideline — 2010 guideline; published 2011; Recommendations for acute uncomplicated cystitis, recommendation 1.
Question 4 of 50
Diagnose · Toddler
An 18-month-old has had a fever of 102.2°F (39.0°C) and has been pulling at her right ear for 2 days. She cries throughout the exam. Which otoscopic finding establishes the diagnosis of acute otitis media?
A. Redness of the tympanic membrane
B. An air–fluid level behind a nonbulging tympanic membrane
C. Moderate bulging of the right tympanic membrane
D. Reduced mobility on pneumatic otoscopy without bulging
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Moderate bulging of the right tympanic membrane
CDC's pediatric summary, drawn from the AAP guideline, says a definitive diagnosis requires moderate or severe bulging of the tympanic membrane or new otorrhea not caused by otitis externa. Mild bulging counts only with ear pain that began within 48 hours or intense erythema. Bulging is the finding that separates acute infection from fluid alone.
Why not A: A crying child's eardrum often looks red. Redness without bulging or effusion doesn't establish AOM.
Why not B: Fluid without bulging fits otitis media with effusion, which isn't treated with antibiotics.
Why not D: Reduced mobility shows fluid behind the drum, but effusion alone isn't AOM.
Rule to remember: AOM needs the bulging/otorrhea criteria and middle-ear effusion; fluid alone is not AOM.
Sources: CDC: Outpatient Clinical Care for Pediatric Populations — April 22, 2024; Acute otitis media: diagnosis and management.
Question 5 of 50
Evaluate · Older adult
An 82-year-old woman with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation has taken apixaban 5 mg twice daily for 2 years. Today she weighs 57 kg (126 lb), and her serum creatinine is 1.0 mg/dL. She has had no bleeding and takes no interacting medicines. What change to her anticoagulation is appropriate?
A. Reduce apixaban to 2.5 mg twice daily
B. Continue 5 mg twice daily because her creatinine is normal
C. Stop anticoagulation because she is over 80
D. Replace apixaban with aspirin 81 mg daily
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Reduce apixaban to 2.5 mg twice daily
The apixaban label calls for 2.5 mg twice daily in atrial fibrillation when a patient has at least 2 of 3 features: age 80 or older, body weight 60 kg or less, or serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dL or higher. She now meets two of them (age 82 and weight 57 kg), even though her creatinine is normal. She still needs stroke protection, so the change is a lower dose, not stopping.
Why not B: Creatinine is only one of the three criteria. Any two of them trigger the lower dose.
Why not C: Age alone isn't a reason to stop. It's one of the dose-reduction criteria.
Why not D: Aspirin isn't a recommended substitute for oral anticoagulation to prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation.
Rule to remember: Apixaban for AF: any 2 of age 80 or older, weight 60 kg or less, creatinine 1.5 mg/dL or higher means 2.5 mg twice daily.
Sources: Eliquis (apixaban) U.S. prescribing information — DailyMed label; Section 2.1: Recommended Dose in Adult Patients; 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Atrial Fibrillation Guideline — 2023 guideline; Recommendations for antithrombotic therapy: aspirin is not an alternative to anticoagulation.
Question 6 of 50
Assess · Middle adult
A 58-year-old man has a 30 pack-year smoking history and quit 10 years ago. He has no respiratory symptoms and is otherwise healthy. Under USPSTF recommendations, what lung cancer screening, if any, should you offer?
A. Annual chest x-ray
B. Annual low-dose chest CT
C. No screening, because he quit more than 5 years ago
D. Annual sputum cytology
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Annual low-dose chest CT
The USPSTF recommends annual low-dose CT for adults aged 50 to 80 with at least a 20 pack-year history who currently smoke or quit within the past 15 years. He's 58, has 30 pack-years, and quit 10 years ago, so he qualifies. Screening stops once someone has gone 15 years without smoking or develops a health problem that limits life expectancy or the ability or willingness to undergo curative lung surgery.
Why not A: Chest radiography isn't the recommended screening test. The USPSTF recommendation is for low-dose CT.
Why not C: The window is 15 years since quitting, not 5. He's at year 10.
Why not D: Sputum cytology isn't a recommended lung cancer screening test.
Rule to remember: USPSTF: ages 50–80, 20 or more pack-years, and smoking now or quit within 15 years support annual low-dose CT when screening remains appropriate.
Sources: USPSTF: Lung Cancer: Screening (2021) — March 9, 2021; Recommendation Summary; eligibility and discontinuation.
Question 7 of 50
Plan · Adolescent
A 15-year-old has facial comedones plus many inflammatory papules and pustules. There are no nodules, cysts, or scars, he has never been treated, and he reports no substantial psychosocial burden. Which initial regimen is most appropriate?
A. Oral isotretinoin
B. Topical clindamycin alone
C. Oral doxycycline alone, continued daily for 12 months
D. A topical retinoid combined with benzoyl peroxide
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. A topical retinoid combined with benzoyl peroxide
The 2024 AAD guideline supports combining treatments that work on different causes of acne. A topical retinoid clears and prevents comedones, and benzoyl peroxide kills acne bacteria without creating antibiotic resistance. A fixed-dose adapalene–benzoyl peroxide product is one way to do this.
Why not A: The AAD recommends isotretinoin for severe acne or acne that has failed standard treatment. This untreated presentation supports starting with topical combination therapy.
Why not B: Using a topical antibiotic by itself encourages resistance. The AAD advises pairing antibiotics with benzoyl peroxide.
Why not C: Oral antibiotics should be time-limited and combined with topical therapy, not used alone for a year.
Rule to remember: Combine mechanisms, and pair an acne antibiotic with benzoyl peroxide rather than using antibiotic monotherapy.
Sources: AAD: Acne clinical guideline — 2024 guideline; Guideline highlights; good clinical practices; AAD: Updated guidelines for the management of acne — January 31, 2024; Strong recommendations and good-practice statements, including isotretinoin.
Question 8 of 50
Diagnose · Young adult
A 30-year-old woman has had a sore throat for 2 days with cough, runny nose, and hoarseness. Her temperature is 99.1°F (37.3°C). Her tonsils are mildly red without exudate, and she has no tender anterior cervical lymph nodes. What is the most appropriate assessment and plan?
A. Possible strep pharyngitis; do a rapid antigen test and treat if positive
B. Presumed strep pharyngitis; start amoxicillin now
C. Likely viral pharyngitis; give supportive care without strep testing or antibiotics
D. Possible strep pharyngitis; send a throat culture and start penicillin while waiting
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Likely viral pharyngitis; give supportive care without strep testing or antibiotics
Clinical features alone can't reliably distinguish strep from viral pharyngitis when viral features are absent. Here, though, cough, runny nose, and hoarseness clearly point to a virus. CDC recommends no group A strep testing for patients with clear viral symptoms and no antibiotics for viral pharyngitis.
Why not A: Clear viral symptoms make routine group A strep testing unnecessary in this case. Testing is not the next step merely because the throat hurts.
Why not B: Strep can't be diagnosed from the exam, and her features make it unlikely. Antibiotics would add side effects without benefit.
Why not D: Neither culture nor empiric penicillin is indicated for this clear viral presentation. A throat culture can diagnose group A strep in appropriate cases; adulthood alone does not make it an invalid test.
Rule to remember: Clear viral pharyngitis features: no routine strep test and no antibiotics.
Sources: CDC: Clinical Guidance for Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis — November 18, 2025; Clear viral symptoms; diagnosis; treatment.
Question 9 of 50
Assess · Older adult
A 70-year-old man smoked for 25 years and quit 20 years ago. He has no abdominal or back pain and has never been screened for an abdominal aortic aneurysm. What should you recommend?
A. One-time abdominal ultrasonography
B. CT angiography of the abdomen
C. Abdominal ultrasonography every year
D. No screening, because he quit smoking 20 years ago
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. One-time abdominal ultrasonography
The USPSTF recommends one-time ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men aged 65 to 75 who have ever smoked. "Ever smoked" includes former smokers, no matter how long ago they quit.
Why not B: Ultrasonography is the standard screening test. CT angiography isn't the recommended screen for an asymptomatic man.
Why not C: The recommendation is one-time screening, not yearly.
Why not D: Former smokers count. The criterion is having ever smoked.
Rule to remember: Men 65–75 who have ever smoked: one-time abdominal ultrasound.
Sources: USPSTF: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Screening (2019) — December 10, 2019; Recommendation Summary; Clinician Summary.
Question 10 of 50
Evaluate · Middle adult
A 44-year-old finished 14 days of bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori last week, and her dyspepsia has improved. She takes omeprazole daily for reflux. How should you confirm that the infection is gone?
A. Serum H. pylori IgG antibody test at her visit next week
B. No further testing, since her dyspepsia has clearly improved
C. Breath or stool antigen test at least 4 weeks after treatment, off PPIs for at least 2 weeks
D. Repeat upper endoscopy with biopsy, required for every patient
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Breath or stool antigen test at least 4 weeks after treatment, off PPIs for at least 2 weeks
The 2024 ACG guideline supports testing everyone for cure after treatment, using a test that detects active infection. Testing should wait until at least 4 weeks after antibiotics are finished, and ACG's own summary says patients should be off proton pump inhibitors for at least 2 weeks first. Otherwise, lingering drug effects can cause false-negative results.
Why not A: Antibodies can stay positive long after cure, so serology can't tell you whether the infection is gone.
Why not B: Feeling better doesn't prove eradication. ACG supports a test of cure for every treated patient.
Why not D: Biopsy-based testing is one option, but a noninvasive breath or stool test works without an endoscopy.
Rule to remember: Prove cure with a test of active infection at least 4 weeks after antibiotics and after at least 2 weeks off PPIs.
Sources: ACG: H. pylori guideline summary (2024) — September 2024; Key Concepts: proof of eradication after treatment.
Question 11 of 50
Assess · Newborn
An 18-hour-old term newborn who is breastfeeding has visible jaundice of the face and chest. His vital signs are normal, and he is feeding well. What is the most appropriate next step?
A. Reassure the parents that this is physiologic jaundice
B. Measure a total serum or transcutaneous bilirubin now
C. Recheck his skin color at 48 hours
D. Give supplemental water between feedings
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Measure a total serum or transcutaneous bilirubin now
The 2022 AAP guideline says bilirubin should be measured as soon as possible in any infant noted to be jaundiced in the first 24 hours after birth. Early jaundice isn't assumed to be physiologic, and measured levels, not appearance, drive the next decision.
Why not A: Jaundice in the first 24 hours needs a measured bilirubin, not reassurance.
Why not C: Visual estimates of jaundice are unreliable, and the AAP calls for measuring now.
Why not D: The AAP recommends against water or dextrose water to prevent or treat high bilirubin.
Rule to remember: Jaundice in the first 24 hours: measure bilirubin now.
Sources: AAP: Management of Hyperbilirubinemia in Newborn Infants (2022) — 2022; infants at least 35 weeks gestation; Key Action Statements 2 and 4.
Question 12 of 50
Plan · Older adult
A 74-year-old woman has had a new right temporal headache for 3 weeks, scalp tenderness when she brushes her hair, and jaw pain when she chews. This morning she had 10 minutes of blurred vision in her right eye that has since resolved. Her ESR is 88 mm/h. What is the most appropriate management today?
A. Arrange temporal artery biopsy first, then start glucocorticoids once the results come back
B. Prescribe an NSAID and recheck in 2 weeks
C. Order a routine outpatient brain MRI
D. Start high-dose glucocorticoids immediately and arrange emergency specialist assessment and biopsy
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Start high-dose glucocorticoids immediately and arrange emergency specialist assessment and biopsy
This is suspected giant cell arteritis with a visual warning sign, and vision loss can become permanent. Treatment shouldn't wait for confirmation. Arrange emergency ophthalmic/specialist assessment while starting treatment. The 2021 ACR/Vasculitis Foundation guideline conditionally favors IV pulse glucocorticoids for threatened vision loss and a temporal artery biopsy within 2 weeks of starting glucocorticoids. Biopsy can still provide useful information later; treatment must not wait for it.
Why not A: That delays treatment while her vision is at risk. Biopsy is ideally obtained within 2 weeks after glucocorticoids start, but can remain informative beyond that.
Why not B: An NSAID doesn't treat vasculitis, and waiting 2 weeks risks blindness.
Why not C: A routine outpatient brain MRI delays emergency treatment and isn't the appropriate response to threatened vision. ACR conditionally prefers temporal artery biopsy over cranial-artery MRI for establishing GCA in its stated U.S. setting.
Rule to remember: Suspected GCA with visual symptoms: treat immediately, arrange emergency assessment, and confirm afterward.
Sources: ACR/Vasculitis Foundation: Giant Cell Arteritis Guideline (2021) — 2021; Printed pp. 1074 and 1076; diagnostic testing and initial treatment (PDF pages 5 and 7).
Question 13 of 50
Assess · Young adult
A 28-year-old nonsmoker asks to start a combined oral contraceptive. Her blood pressure is 118/74 mm Hg. She gets headaches about twice a month that respond to ibuprofen. Which additional history matters most before you prescribe?
A. Whether she has ever had migraine aura
B. Whether her mother also had migraine headaches
C. Her age at menarche and how regular her cycles are
D. Whether caffeine helps relieve her headaches
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Whether she has ever had migraine aura
Aura means focal, reversible neurologic symptoms, such as spreading zigzag lines or one-sided numbness; it can occur before, during, or without a headache. Under the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria, migraine with aura is category 4 (unacceptable health risk) for combined hormonal contraception because estrogen adds to the stroke risk. Migraine without aura is category 2. If she has aura, choose a non-estrogen option using the eligibility criteria for that method.
Why not B: Family history doesn't change her eligibility for estrogen. Her own aura status does.
Why not C: Menstrual history belongs in contraceptive care, but it does not answer the immediate migraine-with-aura safety question.
Why not D: Caffeine response doesn't distinguish migraine with aura from migraine without aura.
Rule to remember: Aura changes everything for estrogen.
Sources: CDC: U.S. MEC, Combined Hormonal Contraceptives (2024) — U.S. MEC 2024; Headaches/migraine; drug interactions: St. John’s wort.
Question 14 of 50
Diagnose · Middle adult
A 47-year-old with a BMI of 31 kg/m² has no symptoms of high blood sugar. His A1C was 6.8%, and a repeat test 3 weeks later was 6.7%, both from an NGSP-certified laboratory. He has no anemia or hemoglobin variant. How should you interpret these results?
A. Prediabetes
B. Diabetes is confirmed; no additional test is needed to confirm diabetes
C. An oral glucose tolerance test is needed before you can confirm it
D. Normal for his age
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Diabetes is confirmed; no additional test is needed to confirm diabetes
An A1C of 6.5% or higher meets the ADA threshold for diabetes. When there's no unequivocal hyperglycemia, the diagnosis needs two abnormal results: two different diagnostic tests from the same sample, or repeat testing at a different time. He has two abnormal A1C results from separate samples, so the diagnosis is confirmed.
Why not A: Prediabetes by A1C is 5.7% to 6.4%. Both of his results are above that range.
Why not C: No third test is required. Two abnormal results already confirm the diagnosis.
Why not D: Diabetes thresholds don't shift with age.
Rule to remember: Without unequivocal hyperglycemia, confirm with two different abnormal diagnostic tests or an abnormal test repeated at another time.
Sources: ADA Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026, Section 2 — January 2026; Table 2.1 and confirming diagnosis, printed S28 onward (full-supplement PDF page 34).
Question 15 of 50
Plan · Child
A 5-year-old meets DSM-5 criteria for ADHD, with symptoms at home and in preschool for more than 6 months and moderate impairment. He has no coexisting conditions, and an evidence-based parent training program is available locally. What is the recommended first-line treatment?
A. Methylphenidate, starting at a low dose
B. Atomoxetine, starting at a low dose
C. Parent training in behavior management
D. No treatment until he turns 6 and starts school
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Parent training in behavior management
For children from age 4 to the 6th birthday, the 2019 AAP guideline says behavioral treatment comes first: evidence-based parent training in behavior management, with behavioral classroom interventions if available. Methylphenidate may be considered if these don't bring significant improvement and moderate-to-severe problems continue.
Why not A: At this age, medication is a second step after behavioral treatment, used when that isn't enough or isn't available.
Why not B: The AAP's first line for preschoolers is behavioral treatment, and the medication it names as a later option is methylphenidate.
Why not D: The AAP recommends treating ADHD from age 4. Waiting leaves a moderately impaired child without help.
Rule to remember: Age 4 to the 6th birthday: behavior therapy first.
Sources: AAP: ADHD Key Action Statement 5a — 2019 guideline, official AAP KAS page; KAS 5a: preschool treatment.
Question 16 of 50
Diagnose · Older adult
A 68-year-old who currently smokes (40 pack-years) has had a daily productive cough for 2 years and shortness of breath on exertion. Post-bronchodilator spirometry shows an FEV1/FVC ratio of 0.62 and an FEV1 of 65% predicted. What do these results show?
A. A restrictive pattern
B. Normal spirometry for his age
C. Asthma, because an obstructive pattern is present
D. Persistent airflow obstruction consistent with COPD
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Persistent airflow obstruction consistent with COPD
GOLD requires spirometry to diagnose COPD, using a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio below 0.70 to identify airflow obstruction. His ratio of 0.62 after bronchodilator, together with heavy smoking and chronic productive cough, is consistent with COPD. Because a single ratio between 0.60 and 0.80 can vary, repeat spirometry on a separate occasion to confirm persistent obstruction. The pattern is not specific to COPD by itself.
Why not A: A low FVC with a preserved or high ratio can suggest restriction, but total lung capacity is needed to confirm it. His reduced ratio shows obstruction.
Why not B: A post-bronchodilator ratio below 0.70 meets the GOLD threshold for obstruction.
Why not C: Asthma can also cause persistent obstruction. This result alone cannot prove asthma; the smoking history and chronic symptoms make COPD the better fit, with repeat confirmation needed.
Rule to remember: Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC below 0.70 supports obstruction; use clinical context, and repeat a single ratio of 0.60–0.80.
Sources: GOLD Executive Summary: spirometry and diagnosis — 2023 executive summary; Diagnosis: Forced Spirometry.
Question 17 of 50
Plan · Young adult (prenatal)
A 29-year-old with chronic hypertension takes lisinopril 20 mg daily. A home pregnancy test is positive, she is about 6 weeks pregnant, and she plans to continue the pregnancy. Her blood pressure today is 132/84 mm Hg. What is the most appropriate change?
A. Continue lisinopril until the second trimester
B. Stop lisinopril and start labetalol or extended-release nifedipine
C. Switch lisinopril to losartan
D. Stop all antihypertensives now and recheck her blood pressure in 3 months
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Stop lisinopril and start labetalol or extended-release nifedipine
The 2025 AHA/ACC guideline names labetalol and extended-release nifedipine as the preferred agents in pregnancy. It says ACE inhibitors, ARBs, atenolol, direct renin inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists shouldn't be used, to avoid fetal harm. It also recommends treating chronic hypertension in pregnancy to below 140/90 mm Hg and counseling about low-dose aspirin.
Why not A: ACE inhibitors shouldn't be used once someone is pregnant.
Why not C: ARBs carry the same fetal risk and are on the same do-not-use list.
Why not D: The guideline recommends treating chronic hypertension in pregnancy, and 3 months without monitoring isn't safe.
Rule to remember: No ACE inhibitor or ARB in pregnancy. Switch to labetalol or extended-release nifedipine.
Sources: 2025 AHA/ACC High Blood Pressure Guideline — October 2025; published guideline; Section 5.5, recommendations 1–5 and supportive text; printed e269–e271.
Question 18 of 50
Evaluate · Adolescent
A 17-year-old completed a 7-day course of doxycycline for urogenital chlamydia. She has no symptoms, is not pregnant, and says her partner was treated. When should she be tested again?
A. Retest about 3 months after treatment
B. Test of cure 1 week after treatment
C. No further testing, because her partner was treated
D. Retest at her next annual visit only
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Retest about 3 months after treatment
CDC doesn't advise a test of cure for nonpregnant patients treated with a recommended regimen unless adherence is in question, symptoms persist, or reinfection is suspected. Reinfection is common, though, so CDC recommends retesting about 3 months after treatment, whether or not partners were treated. If that isn't possible, retest at the next visit within 12 months.
Why not B: Testing that early can pick up genetic material from dead organisms, and a test of cure isn't advised for her anyway.
Why not C: The 3-month retest applies regardless of whether partners were treated.
Why not D: The target is about 3 months. The next-visit rule is a fallback when that isn't possible.
Rule to remember: After recommended chlamydia treatment, retest at about 3 months; a test of cure is reserved for pregnancy or specific concerns such as adherence, persistent symptoms, or reinfection.
Sources: CDC: Chlamydial Infections — STI Treatment Guidelines 2021; Follow-Up; pregnancy exceptions.
Question 19 of 50
Assess · Middle adult
In this hypothetical example, a screening test has a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 95%. It's used in 1,000 adults aged 40 to 64, in whom the condition's prevalence is 2%. About what percentage of people with a positive result actually have the condition?
A. About 90%
B. About 95%
C. About 27%
D. About 99.8%
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. About 27%
That's the positive predictive value, and you can work it out with counts. At 2% prevalence, 20 of the 1,000 people have the condition, and the test catches 90% of them: 18 true positives. The other 980 don't have it, and 5% of them test positive anyway: 49 false positives. So 18 of the 67 positives are real. 18 ÷ 67 = 26.9%, or about 27%.
Why not A: That's the sensitivity: the share of people with the condition who test positive.
Why not B: That's the specificity: the share of people without the condition who test negative.
Why not D: That's the negative predictive value: 931 true negatives out of 933 negatives.
Rule to remember: Low prevalence drags the positive predictive value down, even with a good test.
Source: Worked calculation from the hypothetical inputs in this question: 20 people have the condition, 18 test positive; 980 do not have it, and 49 test positive. Positive predictive value = 18 ÷ (18 + 49) = 26.9%.
Question 20 of 50
Plan · Older adult
A 72-year-old Spanish-speaking man with limited English proficiency is at a health program covered by Section 1557 to discuss a new diagnosis of heart failure and a new medication plan. His 12-year-old grandson offers to interpret, and the patient agrees. Phone and video interpreter services are available, and it isn't an emergency. How should you communicate with him?
A. Let his grandson interpret, since the patient agrees
B. Use your own conversational Spanish
C. Give him English-language handouts for his family to translate at home
D. Use a qualified medical interpreter by phone or video
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Use a qualified medical interpreter by phone or video
Under 45 CFR 92.201, a covered health program must offer a qualified interpreter when interpretation is needed. It cannot rely on a minor child except temporarily during an emergency involving an imminent threat when a qualified interpreter is not immediately available. A new diagnosis and medication plan is exactly where interpretation errors do harm. Offer the available qualified phone or video service; the rule does not force a patient to accept it.
Why not A: The narrow temporary exception for a minor requires an imminent-threat emergency and no immediately available qualified interpreter. The patient's agreement does not create that exception here.
Why not B: Conversational skill isn't the same as being a qualified interpreter or qualified bilingual staff, and errors here are costly.
Why not C: That doesn't give him meaningful access to the information during the visit.
Rule to remember: Offer qualified interpretation when needed; a minor is not a substitute in a routine visit.
Sources: 45 CFR 92.201: meaningful access for individuals with limited English proficiency — 2025 CFR edition; underlying 2024 rule; Paragraphs (a)–(c), (e)(3), and (h); printed pp. 424–425.
Question 21 of 50
Diagnose · Young adult
A 20-year-old college student has had fever and sore throat for 6 days, with marked fatigue. His exam shows exudative tonsils, enlarged posterior cervical lymph nodes, and a palpable spleen tip. Two days after an urgent care clinic started amoxicillin, he developed a diffuse maculopapular rash. What is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Infectious mononucleosis caused by Epstein-Barr virus
B. Strep pharyngitis with a new amoxicillin allergy
C. Peritonsillar abscess
D. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Infectious mononucleosis caused by Epstein-Barr virus
Posterior cervical lymphadenopathy, a palpable spleen, and marked fatigue with exudative pharyngitis point to mononucleosis. A rash after amoxicillin is a well-known feature of EBV infection. A negative heterophile test doesn't rule it out, and even a positive result does not confirm EBV; EBV-specific antibodies can clarify the diagnosis when needed. While his spleen is enlarged, he should avoid contact sports.
Why not B: Strep doesn't explain an enlarged spleen, and a rash on amoxicillin during mono isn't reliable evidence of a penicillin allergy.
Why not C: You'd expect one-sided tonsil swelling, a deviated uvula, trismus, and a muffled voice.
Why not D: DRESS can occur earlier with beta-lactam antibiotics, so two days does not exclude it. Here, the characteristic mononucleosis illness began before amoxicillin, and no new organ injury or eosinophilia is supplied. That makes EBV the best answer; new systemic deterioration would require urgent reassessment.
Rule to remember: Posterior nodes, spleen, fatigue, and a rash on amoxicillin: think EBV.
Sources: CDC: About Infectious Mononucleosis — CDC page; Symptoms; treatment: amoxicillin/ampicillin and contact sports; CDC: Laboratory Testing for Epstein-Barr Virus — April 10, 2024; Monospot; interpretation of primary infection; DermNet: Drug hypersensitivity syndrome — Updated January 2016; Who gets it; clinical features; systemic involvement.
Question 22 of 50
Assess · Newborn
A 16-day-old term infant had a rectal temperature of 38.3°C (100.9°F) at home and 38.2°C in clinic. She looks well, is feeding normally, and has no source of infection on exam. What is the recommended evaluation and management?
A. Catheterized urinalysis only, with a recheck in 24 hours
B. Reassurance and next-day follow-up, because she looks well
C. Urine, blood, and CSF testing, admission, and parenteral antibiotics
D. A CBC and CRP first, to decide whether further testing or admission is needed
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Urine, blood, and CSF testing, admission, and parenteral antibiotics
UCSF's consensus febrile-infant guideline recommends blood, urine, and CSF testing, hospital admission, and empiric IV antibiotics for well-appearing febrile infants younger than 21 days. A catheterized specimen is used for urine testing. Looking well doesn't exclude serious bacterial infection at this age.
Why not A: At 16 days, urine testing alone does not replace the full evaluation and admission, even when the infant looks well.
Why not B: A well appearance isn't enough to rule out bacteremia or meningitis in a febrile infant this young.
Why not D: Inflammatory markers do not remove the need for blood, urine, and CSF evaluation and admission in this age group.
Rule to remember: A febrile 16-day-old needs full evaluation, parenteral antibiotics, and admission even when well appearing.
Sources: UCSF: Consensus Guidelines for Febrile Infants 0–90 Days — 2023 institutional consensus guideline; Executive summary; suggested laboratory evaluation for 0–21 days; admission.
Question 23 of 50
Plan · Middle adult
A 58-year-old with type 2 diabetes takes metformin 1,000 mg twice daily and lisinopril at the maximum dose. His A1C is 7.4%, eGFR is 48 mL/min/1.73 m² and stable, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio is 350 mg/g, and blood pressure is 126/78 mm Hg. Which addition best reduces his risk of kidney disease progression?
A. Glipizide
B. An SGLT2 inhibitor with proven kidney benefit
C. Stop metformin because his eGFR is below 60
D. Pioglitazone
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. An SGLT2 inhibitor with proven kidney benefit
The ADA's 2026 Standards recommend an SGLT2 inhibitor with demonstrated benefit for people with type 2 diabetes and CKD, starting at an eGFR of 20 mL/min/1.73 m² or higher, to reduce CKD progression and cardiovascular events. His eGFR of 48 and albuminuria make this a clear fit. Albumin of at least 200 mg/g is not a requirement in that recommendation. An eGFR below 60 alone is not a reason to stop metformin; kidney function and individual safety factors guide continued use and dosing.
Why not A: Glipizide lowers glucose but is not the recommended kidney-protective addition here, and it adds hypoglycemia risk.
Why not C: An eGFR of 48 does not by itself require stopping metformin. Continued use and dose depend on kidney function and other risks, not a cutoff of 60.
Why not D: It isn't a recommended choice for slowing CKD progression.
Rule to remember: Type 2 diabetes plus CKD with albuminuria: add an SGLT2 inhibitor if eGFR is 20 or higher.
Sources: ADA Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026, Section 11 — January 2026; Recommendation 11.7a, printed S252 (full-supplement PDF page 258); ADA Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026, Section 9 — January 2026; Metformin section, printed S197 (full-supplement PDF page 203).
Question 24 of 50
Evaluate · Older adult
A 78-year-old man started over-the-counter diphenhydramine 50 mg nightly for sleep 3 weeks ago. Since then he has developed constipation, urinary hesitancy, and daytime confusion. What is the best next step?
A. Add tamsulosin for his new urinary hesitancy
B. Switch his sleep aid to doxylamine nightly
C. Start donepezil for his new cognitive decline
D. Stop diphenhydramine and use non-drug sleep strategies
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Stop diphenhydramine and use non-drug sleep strategies
The AGS Beers Criteria say older adults should avoid first-generation antihistamines like diphenhydramine. They're highly anticholinergic and cause confusion, constipation, and other anticholinergic effects. When new symptoms follow a new drug, suspect the drug before adding another one. Assess the new confusion as well; a suspected medication effect does not exclude other causes.
Why not A: Treating a drug's side effect with another drug is a prescribing cascade. Remove the cause instead.
Why not B: Doxylamine is also a first-generation antihistamine on the Beers avoid list.
Why not C: Confusion that began with a new anticholinergic drug calls for stopping that drug, not starting a dementia medicine.
Rule to remember: New symptoms after a new drug: suspect the drug first.
Sources: American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated Beers Criteria — May 4, 2023; First-generation antihistamines; delirium/anticholinergics; strong-anticholinergic table.
Question 25 of 50
Diagnose · Adolescent
A 16-year-old fainted while sprinting at soccer practice. His uncle died suddenly at age 30. He has a harsh systolic murmur at the left lower sternal border that gets louder with the Valsalva maneuver and on standing, and softer with squatting. There is no ejection click. What is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Still's murmur
B. Aortic stenosis from a bicuspid valve
C. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
D. Vasovagal syncope
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, the outflow obstruction worsens when the ventricle is less full, so the murmur gets louder with Valsalva strain and standing and softer with squatting. Syncope during exertion and a family history of sudden death raise the stakes. He needs an echocardiogram and cardiology evaluation, and he should hold off on strenuous exercise until he's evaluated.
Why not A: Innocent murmurs are soft, often diminish with standing and Valsalva, and don't come with exertional syncope.
Why not B: The murmur of aortic stenosis gets softer with Valsalva strain and standing, the opposite of this murmur.
Why not D: Exertional syncope with this murmur and family history cannot be dismissed as vasovagal. It needs a cardiac evaluation.
Rule to remember: A systolic murmur louder with Valsalva and standing, plus exertional syncope: think hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Sources: MSD Manual Professional: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy — Reviewed/updated September 2026; Symptoms and Signs; Diagnosis.
Question 26 of 50
Assess · Middle adult
A 45-year-old has had low back pain for 5 days after lifting boxes. He has no fever, cancer history, or weight loss, and his neurologic exam is normal. You advise heat, an NSAID, and staying active. Which new finding would require urgent imaging and evaluation?
A. New urinary retention with numbness in the saddle area
B. Pain that spreads into one buttock
C. Pain that gets worse after sitting for a long time at work
D. Tender, tight paraspinal muscles
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. New urinary retention with numbness in the saddle area
Urinary retention with saddle numbness suggests cauda equina syndrome, a surgical emergency. AANS identifies these as red flags requiring immediate medical evaluation; MRI evaluates the nerve compression. Without red flags, acute nonradicular low back pain can be managed with measures like superficial heat and NSAIDs, as described in ACP guidance.
Why not B: Buttock radiation is common in nonspecific low back pain and isn't a red flag on its own.
Why not C: Positional worsening is typical of mechanical back pain.
Why not D: Muscle spasm is an expected finding after a lifting strain.
Rule to remember: Urinary retention plus saddle numbness: think cauda equina and image urgently.
Sources: AANS: Cauda Equina Syndrome — April 5, 2024; Symptoms; Testing and Diagnosis; ACP: Guideline for treating nonradicular low back pain — February 14, 2017; Acute/subacute low-back-pain recommendations.
Question 27 of 50
Plan · Older adult
An 80-year-old with stable coronary artery disease reports fatigue. Her TSH is 12 mIU/L with a low free T4 on two occasions. She isn't taking thyroid medicine. What is the most appropriate initial treatment?
A. Levothyroxine at a full weight-based dose of about 1.6 mcg/kg daily
B. Levothyroxine 25 mcg daily, increased gradually every 6 to 8 weeks as needed
C. No treatment, because TSH normally rises with age
D. Levothyroxine 25 mcg daily with a TSH recheck in 1 week
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Levothyroxine 25 mcg daily, increased gradually every 6 to 8 weeks as needed
A high TSH with a low free T4 is overt primary hypothyroidism, which needs treatment. The levothyroxine label says to start older patients and those with heart disease at 12.5 to 25 mcg a day and increase every 6 to 8 weeks until TSH normalizes. Starting low avoids provoking angina or arrhythmia.
Why not A: The label reserves full starting doses for otherwise healthy, non-elderly patients. With her age and heart disease, start low.
Why not C: Her free T4 is low. That's overt hypothyroidism, not a mild age-related TSH rise.
Why not D: The dose is right, but the label adjusts every 6 to 8 weeks for patients like her. A TSH at 1 week won't reflect the change.
Rule to remember: Older adult or heart disease: start levothyroxine low and go slow.
Sources: Levoxyl (levothyroxine): U.S. prescribing information — U.S. label; Sections 2.1, 2.3 and adult monitoring.
Question 28 of 50
Evaluate · Young adult
A 34-year-old with asthma takes low-dose inhaled budesonide daily and albuterol as needed. She still has symptoms 3 to 4 days a week and wakes at night twice a month. In the office, she exhales right after inhaling from her inhaler instead of holding her breath, and pharmacy records show only two 30-day controller supplies dispensed in the past 6 months, with no other supply. What is the best next step?
A. Step up to a medium-dose inhaled corticosteroid–LABA today
B. Add montelukast 10 mg nightly to her current regimen
C. Start a 5-day course of oral prednisone 40 mg daily
D. Fix her technique and adherence before changing medicines
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Fix her technique and adherence before changing medicines
GINA advises checking inhaler technique, adherence, and modifiable risk factors before stepping up treatment. The observed technique and gaps in controller supply can explain poor control. Correct the technique, address barriers to regular use, and reassess the response.
Why not A: A stronger inhaler won't help much if she can't use it well or doesn't take it. Fix those first.
Why not B: Adding a drug doesn't solve poor technique or missed doses of the one she already has.
Why not C: She isn't having an exacerbation. This is poor ongoing control.
Rule to remember: Before you step up, check technique and adherence.
Sources: GINA 2026 Summary Guide — 2026 edition; Printed pp. 21–22: initial treatment and checks before stepping up.
Question 29 of 50
Diagnose · Older adult
A 67-year-old woman has her first DXA scan. Her femoral neck T-score is −2.6, her lumbar spine T-score is −2.2, and she has never had a fracture. How should you classify her bone density?
A. Low bone mass (osteopenia)
B. Osteoporosis
C. Normal for her age
D. Bone density cannot be classified without a Z-score
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Osteoporosis
ISCD applies T-score criteria to postmenopausal women and men aged 50 or older: a valid T-score of −2.5 or lower at the femoral neck, total hip, or lumbar spine supports osteoporosis. Her femoral neck is −2.6, so the higher spine score does not change that classification.
Why not A: Low bone mass is below −1.0 but above −2.5. Her femoral-neck result is already in the osteoporosis range.
Why not C: That's a Z-score comparison with people her own age. T-scores compare her with healthy young adults.
Why not D: For a postmenopausal woman, T-score criteria can classify bone density. A Z-score is not required to interpret the valid hip and spine T-scores supplied here.
Rule to remember: In postmenopausal women and men 50 or older, a valid hip or spine T-score at or below −2.5 supports osteoporosis.
Sources: ISCD: 2023 Official Adult Positions — 2023 positions; Central DXA for diagnosis; T-score population and sites; NIAMS: Bone Mineral Density Tests—What the Numbers Mean — Reviewed February 2025; T-score and Z-score sections.
Question 30 of 50
Assess · Toddler
At a 24-month visit, a toddler says about 6 single words and no two-word phrases. His parents say he rarely points to show them things. His hearing has never been tested, and the family speaks English and Spanish at home. What is the most appropriate next step?
A. Reassess his speech at the 3-year well-child visit
B. Refer for evaluation only if no gains by 30 months
C. Autism screen now, plus hearing and early intervention referrals
D. Advise the family to switch to speaking only one language at home
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Autism screen now, plus hearing and early intervention referrals
Saying at least two words together is a 2-year milestone, and he's well behind. Rarely pointing to share interest is a social-communication warning sign. The AAP recommends autism-specific screening at 18 and 24 months, and any child with a speech delay needs a hearing evaluation. Referral shouldn't wait for more time to pass.
Why not A: Waiting a year delays evaluation and early intervention for a child who's already behind.
Why not B: He already has concerning signs. Screening and referral are due now.
Why not D: Changing the home language doesn't evaluate a child who is missing milestones and not pointing. He needs screening and referral.
Rule to remember: No two-word phrases at 24 months and little pointing: screen and refer now, and check hearing.
Sources: CDC: Milestones by 2 Years — CDC milestone page; Language/communication; act early if concerned; CDC: Clinical Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder — CDC clinical page; Screening recommendations; developmental surveillance; AAP: Language Delays in Toddlers — Updated April 30, 2021; What your child’s doctor might do; early intervention.
Question 31 of 50
Plan · Middle adult (prenatal)
A 41-year-old at 13 weeks of gestation has chronic hypertension controlled on extended-release nifedipine. She has no aspirin allergy, bleeding disorder, or other contraindication to aspirin. What preeclampsia prevention should you recommend?
A. Low-dose aspirin 81 mg daily, starting now
B. Aspirin 325 mg daily
C. Start aspirin at 28 weeks
D. No aspirin, because her blood pressure is controlled
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Low-dose aspirin 81 mg daily, starting now
The USPSTF recommends low-dose aspirin, 81 mg a day, after 12 weeks of gestation for people at high risk of preeclampsia. Chronic hypertension is one of the high-risk factors. The 2025 AHA/ACC guideline also recommends counseling pregnant people with hypertension about low-dose aspirin.
Why not B: The recommended dose is low-dose aspirin, 81 mg a day.
Why not C: She's already eligible at 13 weeks. There is no reason in this case to postpone the recommended preventive treatment to 28 weeks.
Why not D: Chronic hypertension makes her high risk whether or not it's controlled.
Rule to remember: High risk for preeclampsia: aspirin 81 mg daily after 12 weeks.
Sources: USPSTF: Aspirin Use to Prevent Preeclampsia (2021) — September 28, 2021; Recommendation Summary; high-risk factors; 2025 AHA/ACC High Blood Pressure Guideline — October 2025; published guideline; Section 5.5, recommendations 1–5 and supportive text; printed e269–e271.
Question 32 of 50
Diagnose · Older adult
An 81-year-old nursing home resident had a urine culture on admission that grew more than 100,000 CFU/mL of E. coli. She has no fever, dysuria, urgency, suprapubic or flank pain, or change in mental status, and she has no urinary catheter. What is the correct interpretation and plan?
A. Acute cystitis; treat with nitrofurantoin
B. Pyelonephritis; start ceftriaxone
C. Complicated urinary tract infection; order renal imaging
D. Asymptomatic bacteriuria; don't treat with antibiotics
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Asymptomatic bacteriuria; don't treat with antibiotics
Bacteria in the urine without urinary symptoms or signs of infection is asymptomatic bacteriuria. The IDSA recommends against screening for or treating it in older people who live in long-term care facilities. Treatment exposes her to side effects and resistance without benefit. The main exceptions are pregnancy and endoscopic urologic procedures associated with mucosal trauma.
Why not A: Cystitis needs urinary symptoms. She has none.
Why not B: She has no fever, flank pain, or other sign of kidney infection.
Why not C: A positive culture alone doesn't establish symptomatic UTI. There is no supplied symptom or systemic sign requiring a kidney-infection workup.
Rule to remember: In an asymptomatic older long-term-care resident, a positive culture alone does not justify antibiotics.
Sources: IDSA: Asymptomatic Bacteriuria (2019) — 2019 guideline; Recommendations for long-term-care residents; endourologic procedures.
Question 33 of 50
Assess · Young adult (prenatal)
A 26-year-old at 20 weeks of gestation in her first pregnancy has no diabetes risk factors and normal first-trimester labs. Under USPSTF recommendations, when should she be screened for gestational diabetes?
A. Today, at 20 weeks
B. Only if glucosuria appears on a urine dip
C. At 24–28 weeks of gestation
D. At her postpartum visit
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. At 24–28 weeks of gestation
The USPSTF recommends screening asymptomatic pregnant people for gestational diabetes at 24 weeks or later, typically before 28 weeks. For this patient already receiving prenatal care, plan routine screening at 24–28 weeks. Its insufficient-evidence finding before 24 weeks is not a ban on earlier testing when a different indication is present.
Why not A: Routine screening at 24–28 weeks is appropriate for this asymptomatic patient without additional risk factors. The USPSTF found insufficient evidence for routine screening before 24 weeks.
Why not B: Screening is recommended for all asymptomatic pregnant people at 24 weeks or later, not only when a finding appears.
Why not D: The recommendation is for screening during pregnancy, at 24 weeks or later.
Rule to remember: Routine gestational diabetes screening is usually at 24–28 weeks; assess separate indications for earlier testing.
Sources: USPSTF: Gestational Diabetes: Screening (2021) — August 10, 2021; Clinician Summary: implementation.
Question 34 of 50
Evaluate · Middle adult
A 60-year-old with gout has taken allopurinol 200 mg daily for 8 months. His serum urate is 7.2 mg/dL, and his eGFR is 70. Today he has an acutely hot, swollen left knee just like his previous flares, and he is afebrile. What should you do with his allopurinol?
A. Hold allopurinol until the flare fully resolves, then restart
B. Continue it, treat the flare, then titrate to urate below 6 mg/dL
C. Stop allopurinol permanently, since it isn't preventing flares
D. Switch from allopurinol to probenecid
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Continue it, treat the flare, then titrate to urate below 6 mg/dL
The 2020 ACR guideline strongly recommends a treat-to-target strategy: adjust the urate-lowering dose until serum urate is below 6 mg/dL. His urate is 7.2, so review adherence and titrate the tolerated regimen toward target. ACR even conditionally recommends starting urate-lowering therapy during a flare when it's indicated, so there's no reason to interrupt therapy he's already on. Treat the flare itself with colchicine, an NSAID, or a glucocorticoid. Assess for septic arthritis; absence of fever does not exclude it, and suspected infection requires joint aspiration.
Why not A: Stopping it doesn't treat the flare and sets back urate control. ACR supports urate-lowering therapy even during a flare.
Why not C: He's still having flares and isn't at target. He needs more urate lowering, not less.
Why not D: ACR prefers allopurinol as the first-line urate-lowering drug. Review adherence and titrate it as tolerated before assuming it has failed.
Rule to remember: Don't stop urate-lowering therapy for a flare. Titrate to a urate below 6 mg/dL.
Sources: ACR: Management of Gout (2020) — 2020 guideline; Printed pp. 749–750 and 752: treat-to-target, ULT continuation and flare treatment.
Question 35 of 50
Diagnose · Young adult
A 35-year-old has taken the same combined oral contraceptive for 3 years without missing pills, using phone reminders. Six weeks ago she started St. John's wort for low mood. For the past 2 cycles she has had breakthrough bleeding. What is the most likely cause?
A. St. John's wort speeding up her pill's metabolism
B. Endometrial hyperplasia from unopposed estrogen
C. New-onset hypothyroidism affecting her cycles
D. A cervical polyp causing contact bleeding
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. St. John's wort speeding up her pill's metabolism
CDC's U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria describes evidence that St. John's wort can increase contraceptive hormone metabolism, with breakthrough bleeding and ovulation. The UK drug regulator advises women using hormonal contraception not to take it. Next steps: a pregnancy test, backup contraception or a method that doesn't interact, and a different plan for her mood.
Why not B: Bleeding that starts right after a new enzyme-inducing supplement, in a young woman on a stable pill, points to the interaction first.
Why not C: Thyroid disease can change bleeding patterns, but nothing here suggests it, and the timing fits the supplement.
Why not D: A polyp is possible, but the timing fits the supplement. If bleeding continues after stopping it, examine her.
Rule to remember: St. John's wort can make hormonal contraception fail.
Sources: CDC: U.S. MEC, Combined Hormonal Contraceptives (2024) — U.S. MEC 2024; Headaches/migraine; drug interactions: St. John’s wort; MHRA: St John’s wort and hormonal contraceptives — March 2014 article; web publication December 11, 2014; Advice for healthcare professionals.
Question 36 of 50
Assess · Older adult
A 70-year-old man at average risk for colorectal cancer is overdue for screening. After you explain colonoscopy, he declines it. He is alert and can describe the purpose of screening and the risks of not screening in his own words. Which factor determines whether you should honor his refusal?
A. Whether his adult children agree with his decision
B. Whether his MMSE score is 24 or higher today
C. Whether you judge his refusal to be reasonable
D. Whether he has decision-making capacity for this choice
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Whether he has decision-making capacity for this choice
Decision-making capacity is specific to the decision at hand, and it rests on four abilities: understanding the information, appreciating how it applies to him, reasoning about the options, and communicating a choice. Capacity isn't about whether he makes the choice you would. If he has it, respect the refusal, document the discussion, and offer other options, such as a stool-based test.
Why not A: Family agreement doesn't determine a capable adult's right to decide.
Why not B: Screening scores don't determine capacity for a specific decision, especially in the middle range.
Why not C: A capable patient can make a choice the clinician wouldn't make.
Rule to remember: Capacity is decision-specific: understand, appreciate, reason, and choose.
Sources: AAFP: Evaluating Medical Decision-Making Capacity in Practice — July 1, 2018; Four abilities; decision-specific capacity; directed interview; AMA Code of Medical Ethics: Informed Consent — Undated opinion; Opinion 2.1.1; USPSTF: Colorectal Cancer: Screening (2021) — May 18, 2021; Recommendation Summary; Clinician Summary; screening intervals.
Question 37 of 50
Plan · Infant
A healthy 7-month-old is at a well-child visit. Her first lower incisor came in last week. Her family has fluoridated community water, and she hasn't seen a dentist. What should you do about fluoride today?
A. Examine her teeth and apply varnish only if a cavity is found
B. Wait for her first dental visit to start fluoride
C. Apply fluoride varnish to her tooth today
D. Avoid all fluoride until age 2
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Apply fluoride varnish to her tooth today
The USPSTF recommends that primary care clinicians apply fluoride varnish to the primary teeth of infants and children younger than 5, starting when the first tooth erupts. She has a tooth, so varnish is due today, whether or not she has seen a dentist.
Why not A: Varnish is preventive care for children younger than 5 once teeth erupt; a cavity is not required. The USPSTF's insufficient-evidence finding for routine caries screening by primary care clinicians is not a recommendation against examining the mouth.
Why not B: The recommendation is for primary care clinicians to apply varnish, starting at tooth eruption.
Why not D: That contradicts the recommendation to start varnish when the first tooth erupts.
Rule to remember: First tooth, first fluoride varnish.
Sources: USPSTF: Prevention of Dental Caries in Children Younger Than 5 — December 7, 2021; Recommendation Summary; Clinician Summary.
Question 38 of 50
Diagnose · Middle adult
A 48-year-old administrative assistant wakes at night with numbness in her right thumb, index, and middle fingers that improves when she shakes her hand. Phalen's test reproduces the numbness. Sensation in her little finger is normal, and she has no neck pain. What is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Carpal tunnel syndrome
B. Cubital tunnel syndrome
C. C8 radiculopathy
D. De Quervain tenosynovitis
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Carpal tunnel syndrome
Numbness in the median nerve distribution (thumb, index, and middle fingers), worse at night and relieved by shaking the hand, with a positive Phalen's test, is the classic picture of carpal tunnel syndrome. A normal little finger makes ulnar and C8 problems less likely; no single finding excludes them.
Why not B: Ulnar nerve compression at the elbow affects the ring and little fingers.
Why not C: A C8 root problem affects the little finger and inner hand and often comes with neck pain.
Why not D: It causes pain at the thumb side of the wrist with thumb movement, not finger numbness.
Rule to remember: Median nerve fingers, night symptoms, and a positive Phalen's test: carpal tunnel.
Sources: AAOS OrthoInfo: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome — AAOS clinical reference; Anatomy; Symptoms; Physical Examination.
Question 39 of 50
Assess · Older adult
A 72-year-old woman who lives alone fell last month while getting up from a chair. She now feels unsteady when walking. She wasn't injured and didn't lose consciousness. What is the most appropriate next assessment?
A. A DXA scan to measure her hip bone density
B. Timed Up and Go test with gait and balance observation
C. A noncontrast head CT to look for a bleed
D. A front-wheeled walker, without further assessment
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Timed Up and Go test with gait and balance observation
CDC's STEADI approach assesses gait, strength, and balance in older adults who screen positive for fall risk. On the Timed Up and Go test, an older adult who takes 12 seconds or longer is at risk for falling. Watching how she walks also shows which deficits to target.
Why not A: Bone density affects fracture risk, but it doesn't explain why she's falling.
Why not C: She had no head injury and didn't lose consciousness.
Why not D: A device chosen without assessing her gait and balance may not fit her problem.
Rule to remember: Fall plus unsteadiness: assess gait, strength, and balance. A TUG of 12 seconds or more means risk.
Sources: CDC STEADI: Timed Up and Go — 2017 instrument; Single-page instructions and observation checklist.
Question 40 of 50
Plan · Young adult
A 32-year-old with asthma uses albuterol about 3 days a week and wakes with symptoms once a month. She has had no exacerbations and takes no controller medicine. What is the most appropriate change?
A. Continue albuterol as needed without a controller
B. Add salmeterol alone as a daily controller
C. Give a 5-day course of oral prednisone
D. Start an inhaled corticosteroid–containing regimen
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Start an inhaled corticosteroid–containing regimen
GINA says adults and adolescents with asthma shouldn't be treated with a short-acting bronchodilator alone. To lower the risk of severe exacerbations, their treatment should contain an inhaled corticosteroid. Starting an ICS-containing regimen addresses the ongoing symptoms and the risk left by albuterol-only treatment.
Why not A: Short-acting bronchodilator–only treatment leaves airway inflammation untreated and raises the risk of severe exacerbations.
Why not B: A long-acting bronchodilator without an inhaled corticosteroid still leaves inflammation untreated. GINA's adult and adolescent asthma regimens include an ICS.
Why not C: She isn't having an exacerbation. She needs ongoing controller treatment.
Rule to remember: For adults and adolescents with asthma, include an inhaled corticosteroid rather than relying on bronchodilator-only treatment.
Sources: GINA 2026 Summary Guide — 2026 edition; Printed pp. 21–22: initial treatment and checks before stepping up.
Question 41 of 50
Evaluate · Middle adult
A 45-year-old has taken levothyroxine 100 mcg daily with a normal TSH for 2 years. Today her TSH is 8.2 mIU/L. She says she hasn't missed doses, but 3 months ago she started taking her levothyroxine at breakfast along with coffee and a calcium carbonate supplement. What is the best next step?
A. Increase levothyroxine to 150 mcg daily and recheck TSH in about 6 weeks
B. Switch to desiccated thyroid extract at an equivalent dose
C. Take it fasting, 4 hours apart from calcium; recheck TSH in about 6 weeks
D. Keep her routine as is and recheck TSH in 1 week
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Take it fasting, 4 hours apart from calcium; recheck TSH in about 6 weeks
The levothyroxine label says to take it on an empty stomach, half an hour to an hour before breakfast, and at least 4 hours apart from drugs that interfere with its absorption, which include calcium carbonate. The timing change is a plausible explanation for her higher TSH. Fix the timing first, then recheck once a new steady state is reached.
Why not A: That treats an absorption problem with more drug. Once she takes it correctly again, the higher dose could overtreat her.
Why not B: Changing products doesn't fix the absorption problem.
Why not D: Keeping the routine leaves the absorption problem in place, and TSH won't reflect any change within a week.
Rule to remember: Rising TSH on a stable dose: first check how and when the pill is taken.
Sources: Levoxyl (levothyroxine): U.S. prescribing information — U.S. label; Sections 2.1, 2.3 and adult monitoring.
Question 42 of 50
Diagnose · Older adult
A 72-year-old woman has 6 weeks of aching and stiffness in both shoulders and hips, with about 90 minutes of morning stiffness. Her ESR is 58 mm/h and CRP is elevated. Rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP antibodies are negative. She has no headache, jaw pain, or visual symptoms, and no swelling in her hand joints. What is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Polymyalgia rheumatica
B. Rheumatoid arthritis
C. Osteoarthritis
D. Fibromyalgia
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Polymyalgia rheumatica
The 2012 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for polymyalgia rheumatica center on this picture: age 50 or older, bilateral shoulder aching, raised ESR or CRP, morning stiffness longer than 45 minutes, hip involvement, and negative rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP. Those are classification criteria for research, not a stand-alone diagnostic test; clinical assessment must exclude mimics. Because PMR and giant cell arteritis often overlap, ask about headache, jaw pain, and vision changes at every visit.
Why not B: Negative serologies and no hand synovitis make RA less likely than PMR in this pattern.
Why not C: Osteoarthritis causes brief stiffness in specific joints, not prolonged girdle stiffness with high inflammatory markers.
Why not D: Fibromyalgia itself does not explain the elevated ESR or CRP; another inflammatory cause would still need consideration.
Rule to remember: Older adult with shoulder and hip girdle stiffness and high inflammatory markers: consider PMR, exclude mimics, and ask about GCA symptoms.
Sources: EULAR/ACR: 2012 provisional PMR classification criteria — March 2012; Abstract; classification algorithm and intended use; ACR/Vasculitis Foundation: Giant Cell Arteritis Guideline (2021) — 2021; Printed pp. 1074 and 1076; diagnostic testing and initial treatment (PDF pages 5 and 7).
Question 43 of 50
Assess · Adolescent
At a 15-year-old's annual visit, her depression questionnaire shows she has had thoughts of being better off dead nearly every day for the past 2 weeks. What is the most appropriate next step?
A. Avoid asking about suicide directly, so you don't plant the idea in her mind
B. Ask her privately and directly about current suicidal thoughts and a plan
C. Give her a crisis pamphlet and schedule follow-up in 4 weeks
D. Start an SSRI today and reassess her mood in 4 weeks
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Ask her privately and directly about current suicidal thoughts and a plan
This response needs a suicide safety assessment right away; it isn't enough to wait for a routine depression follow-up. NIMH's youth outpatient guide provides the approach: ask directly, in private if possible, about current thoughts of suicide, a plan, and access to means. Thoughts of killing herself right now require urgent mental health evaluation, and she must not be left alone. The depression questionnaire in this case is not itself the ASQ screening tool.
Why not A: Suicide screening is built on asking directly. Avoiding the question leaves her risk unknown.
Why not C: A positive screen needs a safety assessment today, not in a month.
Why not D: Treatment may come later, but her immediate safety has to be assessed first.
Rule to remember: Positive suicide screen: ask directly about current thoughts and a plan, today.
Sources: NIMH: Youth Outpatient Brief Suicide Safety Assessment Guide — Undated NIMH guide; Assess the patient: frequency of suicidal thoughts, plan and disposition.
Question 44 of 50
Plan · Middle adult
A 55-year-old with hypertension and hyperlipidemia develops pressure in the center of his chest that spreads to his jaw while he's in your clinic. It has lasted 20 minutes, and he is nauseated and sweating. What is the most appropriate action?
A. Have his spouse drive him straight to the nearest emergency department now
B. Schedule an outpatient stress test next week
C. Start a proton pump inhibitor trial
D. Activate EMS for emergency transport and get a 12-lead ECG while you wait, without delaying transport
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Activate EMS for emergency transport and get a 12-lead ECG while you wait, without delaying transport
The 2021 AHA/ACC chest pain guideline says office patients with evidence of acute coronary syndrome should be transported urgently to the emergency department, ideally by EMS. It also calls for an ECG within 10 minutes of arrival in any setting. Do not delay transfer to obtain the ECG or other office testing.
Why not A: The guideline favors EMS, which can treat and monitor him on the way.
Why not B: Ongoing chest pain with these features is a possible acute coronary syndrome, not a stable outpatient problem.
Why not C: Assuming reflux risks missing a heart attack.
Rule to remember: Possible ACS in the office: EMS, not a private car; get an ECG if it won't delay transfer.
Sources: AHA/ACC Chest Pain Guideline: official slide set (2021) — October 28, 2021; Slides 32–33: Setting Considerations.
Question 45 of 50
Diagnose · Young adult
A 29-year-old has a thin, gray-white vaginal discharge with a fishy odor. The discharge coats the vaginal walls evenly. Vaginal pH is 5.0, the whiff test is positive, and saline microscopy shows clue cells. There is no vulvar redness. What is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Bacterial vaginosis
B. Vulvovaginal candidiasis
C. Trichomoniasis
D. Normal physiologic discharge
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Bacterial vaginosis
CDC's clinical criteria for bacterial vaginosis require at least three of four findings: a thin, homogeneous discharge, clue cells on microscopy, vaginal pH above 4.5, and a fishy odor with potassium hydroxide (a positive whiff test). She has all four.
Why not B: Yeast infection usually comes with itching and redness, a normal pH, and yeast on microscopy, not clue cells.
Why not C: Trichomoniasis can raise vaginal pH, but diagnosis depends on detecting Trichomonas. Clue cells point to BV.
Why not D: Normal discharge doesn't have a pH above 4.5, clue cells, and a positive whiff test.
Rule to remember: Three of four (thin discharge, clue cells, pH above 4.5, positive whiff): bacterial vaginosis.
Sources: CDC: Bacterial Vaginosis — STI Treatment Guidelines 2021; Diagnostic Considerations: Amsel criteria; CDC: Vulvovaginal Candidiasis — STI Treatment Guidelines 2021; Diagnostic Considerations; CDC: Trichomoniasis — STI Treatment Guidelines 2021; Diagnostic Considerations.
Question 46 of 50
Evaluate · Older adult
A 79-year-old comes in 5 days after discharge for a heart failure exacerbation. His discharge list includes furosemide 40 mg daily. He brought his pill bottles, and you see he is also still taking the bumetanide he used before admission. He feels dizzy when he stands up. What is the most important next step?
A. Increase his furosemide dose for better fluid control
B. Order an echocardiogram to reassess his ejection fraction
C. Reconcile his discharge list against the bottles he brought
D. Keep both diuretics and arrange cardiology follow-up in 3 months
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Reconcile his discharge list against the bottles he brought
Taking two loop diuretics at once can cause volume depletion and contribute to dizziness on standing. Medication reconciliation at a transition of care means comparing what he was prescribed with what he's actually taking, resolving discrepancies like this duplicate, and updating one accurate list. Assess his blood pressure, volume status, kidney function, and electrolytes promptly while clarifying the intended regimen with the discharging team.
Why not A: He's likely already getting too much diuretic. More would make it worse.
Why not B: An echocardiogram doesn't address the medication error in front of you.
Why not D: Continuing both leaves the duplicate in place, and it's a problem now, not in 3 months.
Rule to remember: After discharge, reconcile the bottles against the list and promptly assess symptoms of a medication error.
Sources: AHRQ PSNet: Medication Reconciliation — AHRQ patient-safety primer; Definition; transitions of care and discrepancies.
Question 47 of 50
Assess · Child
A 4-year-old is at a well-child visit. She has never had her vision screened, and her parents have no concerns about her eyes. What should you do?
A. Wait to screen her vision until she starts school at 6
B. Screen her vision today with a chart or instrument-based screener
C. Screen her vision only if her parents notice a problem
D. Refer her for a routine dilated eye exam by a pediatric eye specialist
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Screen her vision today with a chart or instrument-based screener
The USPSTF recommends vision screening at least once in all children aged 3 to 5 to detect amblyopia or its risk factors. Parents often can't tell when one eye sees poorly, so a lack of concern doesn't replace screening.
Why not A: The recommended window is ages 3 to 5, while amblyopia treatment works best.
Why not C: The recommendation covers all children aged 3 to 5, not just those with concerns.
Why not D: The recommendation is for screening in primary care, not routine referral for everyone.
Rule to remember: Screen vision at least once between ages 3 and 5.
Sources: USPSTF: Vision Screening in Children — September 5, 2017; Recommendation Summary.
Question 48 of 50
Plan · Older adult
A nurse practitioner employed by a physician-owned practice sees, in the office, a new 68-year-old traditional fee-for-service Medicare Part B patient for a new problem. The supervising physician is in the building but doesn't see the patient. How should this visit be billed to Medicare?
A. Under the physician's NPI at 100%, as an incident-to service
B. It can't be billed, because NPs can't bill Medicare directly
C. Under the NP's own NPI at 100% of the physician fee schedule
D. Under the NP's own NPI, with an allowed amount capped at 85% of the physician fee schedule
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Under the NP's own NPI, with an allowed amount capped at 85% of the physician fee schedule
Incident-to billing requires the physician to have personally started the course of treatment and to stay actively involved. That has not happened for this new patient's new problem, so the NP bills the otherwise covered professional service under their own National Provider Identifier (NPI). Under 42 CFR 414.56(c), the NP allowed amount is capped at 85% of the physician fee-schedule amount. The allowed amount is not the same thing as Medicare's payment after applicable deductible and coinsurance rules.
Why not A: Being in the building is not enough. The physician has not personally initiated the course of treatment required for this incident-to claim.
Why not B: NPs bill Medicare under their own NPI.
Why not C: For this NP-billed professional service, the allowed amount is capped at 85%, not 100%, of the physician fee-schedule amount.
Rule to remember: For this new office patient, use the NP's own NPI; the allowed amount is capped at 85%. Physician presence alone does not establish incident-to eligibility.
Sources: 42 CFR 414.56: Nurse practitioner services — Current eCFR display up to date September 17, 2026; Paragraph (c): Allowed amounts; CMS Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Chapter 15 — CMS manual; Section 60.2; PDF page 66: physician initial service and continued active participation.
Question 49 of 50
Assess · Young adult
A 24-year-old rolled his right ankle playing basketball 2 hours ago. He has pain in the malleolar zone and can take 4 steps with a limp. He has bone tenderness along the posterior edge of the lateral malleolus, within 6 cm of its tip. There's no tenderness over the midfoot, navicular, or base of the fifth metatarsal. What imaging is indicated?
A. No imaging, because he can bear weight
B. MRI of the ankle
C. Ankle radiographs
D. Foot radiographs only
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. Ankle radiographs
Under the Ottawa ankle rules, ankle x-rays are needed if there's pain in the malleolar zone and either bone tenderness at the posterior edge or tip of either malleolus (the distal 6 cm) or inability to bear weight for 4 steps both immediately after injury and at assessment. His malleolar bone tenderness meets the rule even though he can walk.
Why not A: Bearing weight doesn't cancel malleolar bone tenderness. Either one triggers ankle films.
Why not B: MRI isn't the first test for a possible acute ankle fracture.
Why not D: Foot films use a separate rule: midfoot pain plus navicular/base-of-fifth tenderness, or inability to take four steps immediately after injury and at assessment. He has no midfoot pain or those findings.
Rule to remember: With malleolar-zone pain after injury, posterior-edge or tip tenderness over the distal 6 cm of either malleolus supports ankle films even when walking is possible.
Sources: NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation: Ottawa ankle rules (adult) — governmental clinical pathway; Ankle and foot radiograph criteria.
Question 50 of 50
Assess · Middle adult
A 46-year-old has no personal or family history of colorectal cancer or polyps and no symptoms. She asks when she should start colorectal cancer screening. What do you recommend?
A. Wait until age 50 to start any colorectal screening
B. Start screening now, such as annual FIT or colonoscopy every 10 years
C. Order a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) blood test now
D. Screen only if she develops rectal bleeding, anemia, or a change in bowel habits
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. Start screening now, such as annual FIT or colonoscopy every 10 years
The USPSTF recommends colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults starting at 45 (a B recommendation for ages 45 to 49 and an A for 50 to 75). Acceptable strategies include an annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT) or colonoscopy every 10 years, among others.
Why not A: The starting age dropped to 45 in 2021.
Why not C: CEA isn't one of the recommended screening strategies.
Why not D: Those symptoms call for diagnostic evaluation. Screening is for people without symptoms.
Rule to remember: Average risk: start colorectal screening at 45.
Sources: USPSTF: Colorectal Cancer: Screening (2021) — May 18, 2021; Recommendation Summary; Clinician Summary; screening intervals.
Answer key
Show the complete answer key
| Question | Answer | Domain | Patient age |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | B | Assess | Middle adult |
| 2 | D | Diagnose | Older adult |
| 3 | A | Plan | Young adult |
| 4 | C | Diagnose | Toddler |
| 5 | A | Evaluate | Older adult |
| 6 | B | Assess | Middle adult |
| 7 | D | Plan | Adolescent |
| 8 | C | Diagnose | Young adult |
| 9 | A | Assess | Older adult |
| 10 | C | Evaluate | Middle adult |
| 11 | B | Assess | Newborn |
| 12 | D | Plan | Older adult |
| 13 | A | Assess | Young adult |
| 14 | B | Diagnose | Middle adult |
| 15 | C | Plan | Child |
| 16 | D | Diagnose | Older adult |
| 17 | B | Plan | Young adult (prenatal) |
| 18 | A | Evaluate | Adolescent |
| 19 | C | Assess | Middle adult |
| 20 | D | Plan | Older adult |
| 21 | A | Diagnose | Young adult |
| 22 | C | Assess | Newborn |
| 23 | B | Plan | Middle adult |
| 24 | D | Evaluate | Older adult |
| 25 | C | Diagnose | Adolescent |
| 26 | A | Assess | Middle adult |
| 27 | B | Plan | Older adult |
| 28 | D | Evaluate | Young adult |
| 29 | B | Diagnose | Older adult |
| 30 | C | Assess | Toddler |
| 31 | A | Plan | Middle adult (prenatal) |
| 32 | D | Diagnose | Older adult |
| 33 | C | Assess | Young adult (prenatal) |
| 34 | B | Evaluate | Middle adult |
| 35 | A | Diagnose | Young adult |
| 36 | D | Assess | Older adult |
| 37 | C | Plan | Infant |
| 38 | A | Diagnose | Middle adult |
| 39 | B | Assess | Older adult |
| 40 | D | Plan | Young adult |
| 41 | C | Evaluate | Middle adult |
| 42 | A | Diagnose | Older adult |
| 43 | B | Assess | Adolescent |
| 44 | D | Plan | Middle adult |
| 45 | A | Diagnose | Young adult |
| 46 | C | Evaluate | Older adult |
| 47 | B | Assess | Child |
| 48 | D | Plan | Older adult |
| 49 | C | Assess | Young adult |
| 50 | B | Assess | Middle adult |
What your score means
Your percentage tells you how you did on these 50 questions. It isn't an NPCB score, and it doesn't convert to a pass or fail. NPCB sets its passing standard through a standard-setting process and says scores are not reported as a percentage of correct answers (Candidate Handbook, p. 10).
Count your first answer before seeing the explanation. A correct guess still counts as correct—mark it as unsure for review. Keep answers seen before an attempt separate from both wrong answers and unanswered questions. Calculate a 50-question percentage only after answering all 50 without first opening their explanations or the answer key. For an incomplete or previewed set, record the counts instead: correct, incorrect, seen before answering, and unanswered.
What this set can do is show you which kinds of decisions you miss. Treat your domain and age tallies as pointers, not verdicts. The domain groups contain only 8 to 16 questions, and individual age groups contain 1 to 15, so missing 4 of the 8 Evaluate questions is a reason to look at follow-up and monitoring decisions, not proof that Evaluate is your weakest area.
Review what you missed
Work through your misses before retaking these same 50 questions. For each miss, and each lucky guess:
- Name the decision the question tested, such as "when to retest after chlamydia treatment," not just "chlamydia."
- Find the clue in the question that decides it, and say why the right answer beats each wrong one.
- Label the miss: you didn't know the fact, you knew it but misread the question, or you applied the wrong rule.
- Test the same decision again in a few days with a new question.
A simple error log keeps this honest. Copy this table into your notes:
| Question | Decision tested | Clue I missed | What I'll review |
|---|---|---|---|
| Example: Q10 | Confirming H. pylori eradication | Antibodies stay positive after cure | Test-of-cure timing and holding PPIs |
Use the linked explanations to work through your error log, then return to the questions you marked as unsure.
How this set matches the real exam
The real exam has 150 multiple-choice questions in 3 hours. Of those, 135 are scored and 15 are unscored pretest questions (Candidate Handbook, p. 8). NPCB publishes how its 135 scored questions are split by practice domain and by patient age (FNP exam page). Our 50-question domain allocation approximates those counts; the age table shows the actual cases in this set, not an exact proportional match. The candidate portal still labels the framework the 2024 FNP Examination Blueprint.
| Practice domain | NPCB scored questions (of 135) | This set (of 50) |
|---|---|---|
| Assess | 43 | 16 |
| Diagnose | 36 | 13 |
| Plan | 36 | 13 |
| Evaluate | 20 | 8 |
| Total | 135 | 50 |
| Patient age | NPCB scored questions (of 135) | This set (of 50) |
|---|---|---|
| Newborn | 3 | 2 |
| Infant | 4 | 1 |
| Toddler | 5 | 2 |
| Child | 6 | 2 |
| Adolescent | 12 | 4 |
| Young adult | 30 | 11 |
| Middle adult | 35 | 13 |
| Older adult | 40 | 15 |
| Total | 135 | 50 |
How we scaled the domains: we multiplied each official domain count by 50/135 and used the largest-remainder method so the total stays at 50. For Assess, 43 × 50/135 = 15.93, which becomes 16. The age mix remains broad rather than exact: adult patients make up 39 of our 50 questions (78%), compared with 105 of NPCB's 135 (77.8%).
The two splits are separate. The inspected blueprint does not publish a domain-by-age cross-tabulation, so the pairing in each question is our choice. NPCB also doesn't define ages for its groups; it uses growth and development instead. The ranges in our labels are ours, for sorting: newborn, birth to 28 days; infant, 29 days to 11 months; toddler, 12 to 35 months; child, 3 to 11 years; adolescent, 12 to 17; young adult, 18 to 39; middle adult, 40 to 64; older adult, 65 and up. Three questions involve pregnancy (17, 31, and 33), because NPCB counts prenatal content inside its adolescent, young adult, and middle adult groups.
| Real NPCB FNP exam | This set | |
|---|---|---|
| Questions | 150 (135 scored and 15 pretest) | 50 |
| Time | 3 hours | 60 minutes if you time yourself |
| Pace | 72 seconds per question on average | 72 seconds per question |
| Scoring | Standard-set; not reported as percent correct | Your first-attempt percentage for this set only; keep incomplete and previewed work separate |
This is a 50-question sample, not a full-length exam or an exam simulator. We didn't weight questions by body system or match the exam's difficulty, and every question here has four options by our choice; NPCB describes its exam only as multiple choice.
What's in this set, and what we left out
The questions cover hypertension and diabetes; thyroid disease; asthma and COPD; common infections; women's health and prenatal care; pediatrics from newborn jaundice to ADHD; geriatrics, including delirium, falls, and risky medicines; musculoskeletal problems; primary care emergencies; and professional issues such as decision-making capacity, interpreters, and Medicare billing.
Each answer names and links the guideline or clinical reference behind its teaching point, including USPSTF recommendations, CDC guidance, the 2025 AHA/ACC blood pressure guideline, the 2026 ADA Standards of Care, GINA, GOLD, and AAP publications. Screening questions identify USPSTF when that is the recommendation being tested. Source editions are identified beside the questions; an older publication is not relabeled as a new guideline.
We left three things out on purpose:
- Immunization schedules. This set does not test vaccine schedules.
- Questions that turn on state law, such as minors' consent or prescribing authority, because the rules differ by state.
- Procedure skills. This version doesn't test how to perform procedures.
Questions about this practice test
Are these real AANP exam questions? No. Every question here is original. NPCB treats exam content as confidential and says copying, sharing, or discussing it can lead to invalidated results and disciplinary action (Candidate Handbook, pp. 9 and 13).
Is AANP the same as NPCB? Not quite. The FNP exam comes from the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners Certification Board (AANPCB), which does business as the Nurse Practitioners Certification Board (NPCB). The American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) is a separate membership organization affiliated with NPCB (Candidate Handbook, pp. 1–2). "AANP exam" is everyday shorthand.
I'm taking the ANCC exam instead. Will this help? The clinical reasoning overlaps, but ANCC's FNP-BC exam has its own content outline, length, and format. Check ANCC's FNP certification page for its details.
Sources and how we checked
Written by the Castleport Test Prep Editorial Team.
Last verified: September 22, 2026. The exam facts on this page were checked against NPCB's FNP Candidate Handbook (updated June 2026), candidate-portal blueprint, and FNP exam page. The linked clinical and administrative teaching passages were checked on the same date; each source retains its own publication or guideline edition.
Prepared with AI assistance and checked against the linked sources. This source audit is not an independent clinical review by a practicing nurse practitioner.
Castleport Test Prep is an independent exam prep publisher. We're not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners Certification Board (AANPCB), which does business as the Nurse Practitioners Certification Board (NPCB), or by the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP). Exam and credential names are used only to identify the exam; trademarks belong to their respective owners. These are original practice questions, not NPCB exam items, and a score on this page isn't an NPCB score or a prediction of passing. This page is for exam preparation, not patient-specific clinical advice.