Castleport Test Prep

Free PMHNP Practice Test: 40 Questions With Answers Explained

This free PMHNP practice test has 40 original, unofficial questions on topics shared by the ANCC PMHNP-BC and NPCB PMHNP exams, each with an answer, a teaching explanation, and a linked source. They're free with no signup, and they're a practice sample—not a full-length exam or a prediction of your real score.

Question 1 of 40

A 67-year-old woman with major depressive disorder transfers to your practice. She has taken citalopram 40 mg daily for two years, and her depression is in remission. Today's ECG shows a QTc of 452 ms, and her potassium and magnesium are normal. She would prefer to keep her medication exactly as it is. What is the most appropriate plan?

  • A. Continue citalopram 40 mg daily because her QTc is below 500 ms.
  • B. Gradually reduce citalopram to 20 mg daily and watch for relapse.
  • C. Stop citalopram today and start sertraline tomorrow.
  • D. Add escitalopram 10 mg daily so the citalopram dose can be lowered.

Answer: B. Gradually reduce citalopram to 20 mg daily and watch for relapse.

Citalopram's labeling sets 20 mg once daily as the maximum recommended dose for patients older than 60, because higher drug exposure at this age raises the risk of dose-dependent QTc prolongation. Remission doesn't change that ceiling. Bring the dose down gradually, explain why, and watch for relapse.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. A QTc that stays above 500 ms is the point at which the label says to discontinue citalopram. It isn't permission to exceed the age-based maximum.
  • C. Nothing here requires abandoning a drug that works, and stopping abruptly risks discontinuation symptoms. The label recommends gradual dose reduction.
  • D. Adding another SSRI increases serotonergic risk and doesn't resolve the age-based citalopram dose limit.

Takeaway: For citalopram, age over 60, hepatic impairment, CYP2C19 poor-metabolizer status, and a CYP2C19 inhibitor each cap the dose at 20 mg per day.

Source: Celexa (citalopram) prescribing information, AbbVie, sections 2.3–2.4, 2.6, 5.2–5.3 and 7. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC I. Scientific Foundation · Advanced pharmacology (adverse effects) · NPCB 04 Evaluate · Older adult · PMHNP-01

Pick your answer, then open Show answer and explanation. Record each choice before revealing it; opening an explanation without choosing first is an unanswered item for that run. The answer key and a scoring tally come after Question 40.

Question 2 of 40

A 34-year-old man screened positive on the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) at an outpatient visit. During your follow-up assessment, he says he is having thoughts of killing himself right now and has been thinking about using pills he keeps at home. What should happen next?

  • A. Build a safety plan together and refer him for an outpatient appointment within 72 hours.
  • B. Have him sign an agreement not to harm himself before he leaves.
  • C. Keep him with staff and arrange an urgent (STAT) emergency mental health evaluation.
  • D. Give him the 988 Lifeline number and let him leave with a family member.

Answer: C. Keep him with staff and arrange an urgent (STAT) emergency mental health evaluation.

NIMH's adult outpatient Brief Suicide Safety Assessment is clear: a yes to current suicidal thoughts means imminent risk. The patient needs an urgent or STAT mental health evaluation, can't be left alone, and the medical team should be notified. The matching disposition is an emergency psychiatric evaluation.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. That's the NIMH disposition for patients who need further evaluation but are not at imminent risk. Current thoughts put him in the emergency category.
  • B. NIMH says contracting for safety is not effective and may be dangerous or give a false sense of security.
  • D. 988 belongs in every patient's resources, but it doesn't replace an emergency evaluation when risk is imminent.

Takeaway: "Right now" changes the disposition: don't leave the patient alone, and get a STAT evaluation.

Source: NIMH ASQ Toolkit: Adult Outpatient Brief Suicide Safety Assessment, PDF pp. 1–2; step 2, current suicidal thoughts; step 4, disposition. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC II. Advanced Practice Skills · Psychiatric emergency management (suicidal ideation) · NPCB 03 Plan · Adult · PMHNP-02

Question 3 of 40

A 29-year-old woman seeks treatment for two weeks of low mood, poor sleep, and loss of interest. Records show she was hospitalized three years ago for a manic episode that was not caused by a substance or another medical condition. Which diagnosis best accounts for her full history?

  • A. Bipolar I disorder
  • B. Major depressive disorder, recurrent
  • C. Bipolar II disorder
  • D. Cyclothymic disorder

Answer: A. Bipolar I disorder

NIMH defines bipolar I disorder by manic episodes that last at least 7 days or by manic symptoms severe enough to need immediate hospital care. Depressive episodes usually occur as well. One documented manic episode establishes bipolar I, even when she walks in depressed.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • B. That label ignores the documented manic episode.
  • C. Bipolar II involves hypomanic episodes, which are less severe than mania, along with depressive episodes. A manic episode requiring hospitalization moves her to bipolar I.
  • D. Cyclothymia involves hypomanic and depressive symptoms that don't meet full episode criteria. She has had a full manic episode.

Takeaway: One lifetime manic episode makes it bipolar I. Always take a lifetime mood history.

Source: NIMH: Bipolar Disorder, What is bipolar disorder?; bipolar I, bipolar II and cyclothymic disorder. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC III. Diagnosis and Treatment · DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria · NPCB 02 Diagnose · Adult · PMHNP-03

Question 4 of 40

During a session, an adult patient describes a specific plan to shoot his former business partner this weekend and says he owns a handgun. The PMHNP believes the threat is serious and imminent. Under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, which statement is accurate?

  • A. HIPAA prohibits any disclosure without the patient's written authorization.
  • B. HIPAA requires a court order before anything can be shared with police.
  • C. HIPAA allows disclosure only to another treating clinician who is already involved in his care.
  • D. HIPAA permits sharing necessary information with people who can prevent or lessen the threat.

Answer: D. HIPAA permits sharing necessary information with people who can prevent or lessen the threat.

HHS guidance explains that the Privacy Rule permits a provider, consistent with applicable law and ethical standards, to disclose necessary information to law enforcement, family members, or others reasonably able to prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat, including the target (45 CFR 164.512(j)). Whether a warning is mandatory, not just permitted, comes from state law and court decisions such as Tarasoff, which vary by state.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. The serious-and-imminent-threat permission exists precisely for this situation.
  • B. No court order is required for a threat-prevention disclosure under 164.512(j).
  • C. The permission extends to anyone reasonably able to prevent or lessen the threat, including law enforcement and the intended victim.

Takeaway: HIPAA permits the warning. State law decides whether you must.

Source: HHS OCR: HIPAA Privacy Rule and Sharing Information Related to Mental Health, PDF p. 7; serious/imminent threat and state duty-to-warn discussion. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC V. Ethics, Legal Principles, and Cultural Care · Scope of confidentiality (duty to warn) · NPCB 04 Evaluate · Adult · PMHNP-04

Question 5 of 40

A 41-year-old man completes the PHQ-9 in primary care and scores 17. How is this score best interpreted?

  • A. Moderately severe depressive symptoms
  • B. Mild depressive symptoms that can be rechecked next year
  • C. Moderate depressive symptoms
  • D. A confirmed diagnosis of major depressive disorder

Answer: A. Moderately severe depressive symptoms

In the 2001 PHQ-9 validation study, scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 marked mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression. A 17 falls in the 15-to-19 moderately severe band. The PHQ-9 measures severity and supports diagnosis. In the 580-patient primary-care interview subsample, a score of 10 or more had 88% sensitivity and 88% specificity for major depression against a structured interview. Those are study-specific estimates, not fixed performance in every population; the score still needs a clinician's evaluation.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • B. Mild starts at 5. A 17 is two bands higher.
  • C. Moderate is 10 to 14. A 17 is in the next band up.
  • D. A questionnaire score isn't a confirmed diagnosis. It flags severity for clinical evaluation.

Takeaway: PHQ-9 cutpoints are 5, 10, 15, 20: mild, moderate, moderately severe, severe.

Source: Kroenke, Spitzer and Williams: The PHQ-9 (2001 validation study), Abstract; Tables 2–3; diagnostic validity. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC II. Advanced Practice Skills · Mental health screening tool selection and interpretation (PHQ-9) · NPCB 02 Diagnose · Adult · PMHNP-05

Question 6 of 40

A 30-year-old man with schizophrenia started haloperidol 10 days ago. He now has a temperature of 40 °C, generalized muscle rigidity, confusion, fluctuating blood pressure, a rapid pulse, and heavy sweating. His creatine phosphokinase (CPK) is markedly elevated. He takes no other medications. What is the most likely diagnosis?

  • A. Serotonin syndrome
  • B. Acute dystonic reaction
  • C. Tardive dyskinesia
  • D. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome

Answer: D. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome

The haloperidol label describes NMS as a potentially fatal syndrome with hyperpyrexia, muscle rigidity, altered mental status, and autonomic instability (irregular pulse or blood pressure, tachycardia, sweating), often with elevated CPK. That is this patient. Management starts with stopping the antipsychotic and providing intensive medical treatment and monitoring, so this is an emergency.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. He takes no serotonergic drug, and his picture is rigidity with high CPK rather than twitching and brisk reflexes.
  • B. Dystonia means sustained muscle contractions, usually in the first days of treatment. An isolated dystonic reaction does not best explain this full combination of high fever, generalized rigidity, confusion, autonomic instability, and elevated CPK.
  • C. Tardive dyskinesia typically involves involuntary movements associated with cumulative exposure, although the label notes that it can occur after brief treatment. It does not best explain this acute hyperthermic, rigid, autonomically unstable presentation.

Takeaway: Antipsychotic plus fever, rigidity, mental status change, autonomic instability, and high CPK strongly suggests NMS and needs emergency assessment.

Sources: DailyMed: Haloperidol oral solution prescribing information, Warnings: Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome and Tardive Dyskinesia; Adverse Reactions: Dystonia; Prozac (fluoxetine) prescribing information, Lilly, section 5.2, serotonin syndrome. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC I. Scientific Foundation · Advanced psychopharmacology (NMS) · NPCB 02 Diagnose · Adult · PMHNP-06

Question 7 of 40

A 30-year-old woman with a history of sexual assault becomes visibly tense when the PMHNP closes the office door and sits between her and the exit at a first visit. Which response best reflects a trauma-informed approach?

  • A. Continue as planned so she gets used to the room and the usual interview routine.
  • B. Say what you noticed, offer seating and door choices, and let her set the pace.
  • C. Explain that her reaction is a form of resistance that therapy will need to work through.
  • D. End the visit and refer her to a trauma specialist without discussing the reason.

Answer: B. Say what you noticed, offer seating and door choices, and let her set the pace.

Pennsylvania DHS's summary of SAMHSA's trauma-informed approach sets out six key principles: safety; trustworthiness and transparency; peer support; collaboration and mutuality; empowerment, voice, and choice; and cultural, historical, and gender inclusion. Being open about what you noticed, giving her choices about the room, and letting her set the pace put safety, transparency, and choice into practice.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. Pressing on ignores her psychological safety and her voice in the visit.
  • C. Labeling a trauma response as resistance undermines trust and collaboration.
  • D. An unexplained handoff removes her choice and damages trust. Ask what would help her feel safe before deciding together whether a referral is needed.

Takeaway: Trauma-informed care in practice means safety, transparency, and choice, starting with where everyone sits.

Source: Pennsylvania DHS: Trauma-Informed Organizations, Six key principles; Safety; Trustworthiness and Transparency; Empowerment, Voice, and Choice. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC IV. Psychotherapy and Related Theories · Therapeutic alliance development and management (trauma-informed approach) · NPCB 01 Assess · Adult · PMHNP-07

Question 8 of 40

A 68-year-old veteran has PTSD with nightmares, avoidance, and hypervigilance. Both psychotherapy and medication are available, and he says he'd prefer talk therapy. Which initial treatment best matches the 2023 VA/DoD guideline?

  • A. Alprazolam as needed for hyperarousal
  • B. Sertraline alone, because medication works faster
  • C. Cognitive processing therapy (CPT)
  • D. A cannabis-derived product for sleep

Answer: C. Cognitive processing therapy (CPT)

The 2023 VA/DoD guideline strongly recommends individual, manualized, trauma-focused psychotherapies (cognitive processing therapy, prolonged exposure, or EMDR) and recommends these psychotherapies over medication when both are available. His preference and access make CPT the best fit.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. The guideline recommends against benzodiazepines for PTSD.
  • B. Sertraline is a recommended medication, but the guideline prefers the recommended psychotherapies when both are available, and he wants therapy.
  • D. The guideline recommends against cannabis and cannabis-derived products for PTSD.

Takeaway: PTSD first line: trauma-focused psychotherapy (CPT, PE, or EMDR). The VA/DoD guideline recommends against benzodiazepines and cannabis for treating PTSD.

Sources: VA National Center for PTSD: Overview of Psychotherapy for PTSD, Recommended individual trauma-focused therapies; VA National Center for PTSD: Clinician's Guide to Medications for PTSD, Medication monotherapy table; Benzodiazepines; Cannabis. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC III. Diagnosis and Treatment · Evidence-based practice (psychotherapy selection) · NPCB 03 Plan · Older adult · PMHNP-08

Question 9 of 40

A 33-year-old man with opioid use disorder last took prescription oxycodone 20 hours ago. His Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) score is 14. How should this score be interpreted?

  • A. Mild withdrawal
  • B. Below the mild-withdrawal range
  • C. Severe withdrawal
  • D. Moderate withdrawal

Answer: D. Moderate withdrawal

The COWS bands are 5 to 12 mild, 13 to 24 moderate, 25 to 36 moderately severe, and above 36 severe. A score of 14 falls in the moderate band. The score describes withdrawal severity; it is not, by itself, a prescribing instruction or a complete assessment of when to start buprenorphine.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. Mild withdrawal is 5 to 12. A 14 is in the next band.
  • B. A 14 is not below the mild range; it is moderate withdrawal.
  • C. Severe starts above 36. A 14 is moderate.

Takeaway: COWS bands are 5–12, 13–24, 25–36, and above 36. A score of 14 means moderate withdrawal.

Source: PCSS: Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale, One-page form, scoring-band footer. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC II. Advanced Practice Skills · Substance use screening tool selection and interpretation (COWS) · NPCB 02 Diagnose · Adult · PMHNP-09

Question 10 of 40

In a Medicare-participating hospital, a 15-year-old is placed in restraint for violent behavior after less restrictive measures failed. State law adds no stricter rule. Which statement about the federal requirements is correct?

  • A. A PRN order lets staff restrain him whenever needed for 24 hours.
  • B. Each order is limited to 2 hours at his age, with a face-to-face evaluation within 1 hour.
  • C. Each order may last up to 4 hours, the same limit that applies to an adult patient.
  • D. Once ordered, restraint should continue until the order expires, even if he calms down sooner.

Answer: B. Each order is limited to 2 hours at his age, with a face-to-face evaluation within 1 hour.

The federal patients' rights rule limits orders for violent or self-destructive behavior to 2 hours for patients 9 to 17, with renewals allowed under those limits for up to 24 hours. After 24 hours, an authorized physician or other licensed practitioner must see and assess the patient before writing a new order. It requires a face-to-face evaluation within 1 hour of starting the restraint, and it requires restraint to end at the earliest possible time regardless of how long the order allows.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. The rule prohibits standing or as-needed (PRN) orders.
  • C. Four hours is the limit for adults 18 and older. For ages 9 to 17, it's 2 hours.
  • D. Restraint must end at the earliest possible time, whatever time remains on the order.

Takeaway: For violent or self-destructive restraint in a covered hospital: order limits are 4, 2, and 1 hours by age (18 and up, 9 to 17, under 9), unless state law is stricter. Face-to-face within 1 hour. Never PRN.

Source: 42 CFR 482.13: Hospital patients' rights, paragraphs (e)(6), (e)(8)–(9) and (e)(12). Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC V. Ethics, Legal Principles, and Cultural Care · Ethics in clinical decision making (least restrictive care) · NPCB 04 Evaluate · Adolescent · PMHNP-10

Question 11 of 40

A 35-year-old man of Han Chinese ancestry with bipolar I disorder is being considered for carbamazepine extended-release. Which test does the carbamazepine boxed warning call for before the first dose?

  • A. CYP2D6 genotyping
  • B. CYP2C19 genotyping
  • C. HLA-B\*1502 genotyping
  • D. A serum carbamazepine level

Answer: C. HLA-B\*1502 genotyping

Carbamazepine's boxed warning links Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis to HLA-B\*1502, an inherited allele found almost exclusively in people with ancestry across broad areas of Asia. Patients from at-risk populations should be screened before starting, and those who test positive shouldn't receive carbamazepine unless the benefit clearly outweighs the risk.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. CYP2D6 matters for other drugs (fluoxetine, for example, inhibits it), but it isn't the test in carbamazepine's boxed warning.
  • B. CYP2C19 poor-metabolizer status limits citalopram dosing. It isn't the carbamazepine safety screen.
  • D. A pretreatment serum drug level does not identify HLA-B\*1502 or replace the genetic screen in the boxed warning.

Takeaway: HLA-B\*1502 before carbamazepine in patients with at-risk ancestry. It's a textbook gene-drug interaction.

Sources: DailyMed: Carbamazepine extended-release capsules, ANI, Boxed Warning: Serious Dermatologic Reactions and HLA-B\*1502 Allele; Prozac (fluoxetine) prescribing information, Lilly, section 7.7, CYP2D6 inhibition; Celexa (citalopram) prescribing information, AbbVie, section 2.3, CYP2C19 poor metabolizers. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC I. Scientific Foundation · Psychopharmacogenomics (gene-drug interactions) · NPCB 01 Assess · Adult · PMHNP-11

Question 12 of 40

A 39-year-old woman who drinks above recommended limits says, "I don't know. I guess I've been missing my kids' soccer games on weekends." Which response best builds her motivation, consistent with NIAAA's brief intervention approach?

  • A. "What do you think might be some benefits of cutting back, for you and your kids?"
  • B. "You need to cut back on your drinking, or your health is going to suffer for it."
  • C. "Let's get you scheduled with a counselor right now."
  • D. "Will you commit to stop drinking today, yes or no?"

Answer: A. "What do you think might be some benefits of cutting back, for you and your kids?"

NIAAA's brief intervention model builds motivation with open-ended questions and by listening for the patient's own reasons to change. She just offered one. Inviting her to say more helps her hear her own argument for change, and NIAAA notes that this "change talk" is associated with better alcohol outcomes.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • B. Advice has a place in brief intervention, but this skips past the reason she just gave you.
  • C. Referral can come later, especially for alcohol use disorder, but it's premature before her motivation is explored.
  • D. A closed demand for commitment works against the autonomy NIAAA asks clinicians to support.

Takeaway: When a patient hands you a reason to change, ask an open question that invites more.

Source: NIAAA: Conduct a Brief Intervention—Build Motivation and a Plan for Change, Seven-step model, especially steps 2–5. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC II. Advanced Practice Skills · Clinical interviewing (motivational interviewing) · NPCB 01 Assess · Adult · PMHNP-12

Question 13 of 40

A 38-year-old man started clozapine 10 weeks ago for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. His pharmacist mentions that the Clozapine REMS program no longer exists. He now reports fever and a sore throat. What is the most appropriate action?

  • A. Stop routine blood monitoring, since the REMS program has ended.
  • B. Report his ANC to the REMS program before the pharmacy can dispense his next fill.
  • C. Arrange prompt clinical evaluation, including an absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and act on the findings per the label.
  • D. Treat his symptoms at home and check labs at his next routine visit.

Answer: C. Arrange prompt clinical evaluation, including an absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and act on the findings per the label.

FDA removed the Clozapine REMS effective June 13, 2025, so prescribers and pharmacies no longer enroll or report ANC results to it. The risk of severe neutropenia did not go away. It is greatest in the first several months of treatment, and FDA says prescribers should keep monitoring ANC according to the prescribing information. FDA lists fever and throat infection among symptoms patients should report, and at week 10 he's squarely in the higher-risk window.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. The REMS was an administrative program. ANC monitoring continues under the prescribing information.
  • B. That reporting requirement ended when the REMS was removed.
  • D. Fever and sore throat on clozapine need prompt evaluation for neutropenia, not a wait.

Takeaway: The Clozapine REMS is gone, but ANC monitoring and prompt checks for infection symptoms are not.

Source: FDA: Removal of the Clozapine REMS, What is FDA announcing?; What should health care professionals/patients do?. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC III. Diagnosis and Treatment · Psychopharmacotherapeutic management (monitoring) · NPCB 04 Evaluate · Adult · PMHNP-13

Question 14 of 40

A 12-year-old with obsessive-compulsive disorder fears contamination and washes her hands many times a day. With her therapist, she practices approaching an ordinary, safe trigger: she touches a doorknob and then waits without washing while her anxiety rises and falls. Which intervention is this?

  • A. Exposure and response prevention (ERP)
  • B. Relaxation training alone
  • C. Dialectical behavior therapy skills training
  • D. Parent training in behavior management

Answer: A. Exposure and response prevention (ERP)

She is exposing herself to a feared trigger (the doorknob) while preventing the usual compulsive response (washing). That is exposure and response prevention, an evidence-based psychotherapy for OCD.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • B. Relaxation doesn't involve facing the trigger or blocking the ritual.
  • C. DBT targets emotion regulation, distress tolerance, and relationships. It isn't the standard OCD treatment described here.
  • D. That approach is the first-line treatment for ADHD in young children, not a technique the child practices for OCD.

Takeaway: ERP for OCD means approach a safe trigger with the therapist's guidance and resist the ritual.

Sources: NIMH: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Treatment: Psychotherapy; Exposure and response prevention; NIMH: Borderline Personality Disorder, How is borderline personality disorder treated?; Psychotherapy; DBT; CDC: Treatment of ADHD, Treatment recommendations; By Age Group; Behavior therapy. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC IV. Psychotherapy and Related Theories · Psychotherapy principles (behavioral) · NPCB 03 Plan · Pre-adolescent · PMHNP-14

Question 15 of 40

At a scheduled, nonemergency visit for a 10-year-old boy, his mother has limited English proficiency. The boy offers to interpret, and his mother agrees. The clinic is a covered entity under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act. What should the PMHNP do?

  • A. Let the boy interpret, since his mother agreed.
  • B. Ask a bilingual receptionist who is not qualified to interpret or provide bilingual clinical communication to help with the visit.
  • C. Continue in English, speaking slowly and using simple words.
  • D. Offer a qualified interpreter, in person or remotely, at no cost to the family.

Answer: D. Offer a qualified interpreter, in person or remotely, at no cost to the family.

When interpretation is needed for meaningful access, Section 1557's language-access rule requires a covered entity to offer a qualified interpreter, free of charge. It bars relying on a minor child to interpret except briefly in an emergency involving an imminent threat while a qualified interpreter is found. It also bars relying on staff who are neither qualified interpreters nor qualified bilingual or multilingual staff. Remote video or audio interpreting is allowed when it meets the rule's quality requirements.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. Consent doesn't lift the restriction on relying on a minor child in a nonemergency.
  • B. The rule bars relying on staff who aren't qualified interpreters or qualified bilingual staff.
  • C. That doesn't provide the meaningful language access the rule requires.

Takeaway: Use a qualified interpreter, free to the patient. Don't use children or untrained staff.

Source: 45 CFR 92.201: Meaningful access for individuals with limited English proficiency, (a)–(c); (e)(3)–(4); (f)–(g). Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC V. Ethics, Legal Principles, and Cultural Care · Equity, diversity, and inclusion (specific populations) · NPCB 01 Assess · Pre-adolescent · PMHNP-15

Question 16 of 40

A 72-year-old woman with bipolar I disorder has been stable on lithium for years. She had three days of vomiting and diarrhea and has been taking ibuprofen for knee pain. Today she has a coarse tremor, an unsteady gait, slurred speech, and new confusion. What is the most appropriate action?

  • A. Reassure her that tremor is an expected lithium effect and recheck her level in a month.
  • B. Hold lithium and arrange urgent evaluation with a lithium level and renal function.
  • C. Increase the lithium dose because vomiting likely reduced absorption.
  • D. Add benztropine for the tremor and continue lithium at the same dose.

Answer: B. Hold lithium and arrange urgent evaluation with a lithium level and renal function.

This is a textbook setup for lithium toxicity. Lithium labeling lists volume depletion, recent illness, and drugs that affect the kidneys as risk factors, and NSAIDs such as ibuprofen reduce renal blood flow, which lowers lithium clearance and raises the serum level. Ataxia and slurred speech are moderate toxicity signs, and confusion is a severe one. Older adults can show toxicity at levels other patients tolerate. When toxicity signs appear, the label says to reduce or stop lithium, and severe cases may need hemodialysis.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. A fine hand tremor is a common effect. A coarse tremor that arrives with ataxia, slurred speech, and confusion is not.
  • C. Volume depletion increases lithium-toxicity risk. Raising the dose moves in exactly the wrong direction.
  • D. Benztropine does not treat lithium toxicity. Continuing lithium without urgently evaluating this symptom cluster leaves the cause unaddressed.

Takeaway: Dehydration plus an NSAID plus older age is a lithium-toxicity setup. Coarse tremor, ataxia, and confusion mean stop and check.

Source: DailyMed: Lithium carbonate capsules, Glenmark, sections 2.3, 5.1, 7.1 and 10. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC I. Scientific Foundation · Advanced physical assessment · NPCB 04 Evaluate · Older adult · PMHNP-16

Question 17 of 40

A teacher's ADHD rating scale is positive for a 9-year-old boy. His parents haven't completed any rating scales, and no information has been gathered about his behavior at home or in other settings. What should happen before a diagnosis is made?

  • A. Gather reports from parents and other informants and assess impairment across settings.
  • B. Diagnose ADHD from the teacher's scale, since school is where symptoms matter most.
  • C. Watch him during one office visit, since calm behavior there would rule out ADHD.
  • D. Start a stimulant trial, since a good response to medication would confirm the diagnosis.

Answer: A. Gather reports from parents and other informants and assess impairment across settings.

The current CDC diagnostic guidance, summarizing the AAP approach, call for a diagnostic evaluation using DSM criteria that assesses how much the child is impaired and how pervasive that impairment is across multiple settings. That evaluation draws on multiple informants, such as parents, teachers, and other adults in the child's life, and the child when appropriate. One teacher's scale is a start, not a diagnosis.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • B. A single setting and a single informant don't meet the evaluation standard.
  • C. A single quiet visit can't capture behavior across the settings the evaluation requires.
  • D. A treatment trial isn't one of the recommended diagnostic steps. The evaluation rests on criteria and multiple informants.

Takeaway: ADHD evaluation means multiple informants and multiple settings.

Source: CDC: Diagnosing ADHD, How ADHD is diagnosed; DSM-5 criteria; reports across settings. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC II. Advanced Practice Skills · Mental health screening tool selection and interpretation · NPCB 01 Assess · Pre-adolescent · PMHNP-17

Question 18 of 40

A 79-year-old woman with Alzheimer disease has had slow, gradual memory decline for years. Over the past day, during a urinary tract infection, she has been drowsy one hour and agitated the next, and she can't keep her attention on a conversation. What is the most likely explanation for the new change?

  • A. Expected progression of her Alzheimer disease
  • B. Normal day-to-day variation in dementia
  • C. Delirium superimposed on dementia
  • D. Late-onset schizophrenia

Answer: C. Delirium superimposed on dementia

MedlinePlus describes delirium as coming on fast, over hours to a few days, with trouble staying focused and symptoms that come and go through the day. It often has a medical trigger such as infection, medicines, or low sodium. Dementia, by contrast, starts with minor symptoms that worsen over time. A one-day change in attention and alertness during an infection strongly suggests delirium superimposed on dementia, and it needs prompt medical evaluation.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. Dementia progression is gradual. This change happened in a day.
  • B. The important change is from her own baseline: new, fluctuating inattention and alertness during an acute illness. Do not dismiss that as ordinary dementia variation.
  • D. Nothing here describes psychosis, and a sudden fluctuating attention problem during an infection points to delirium.

Takeaway: Sudden onset, fluctuating attention, and a medical trigger suggest delirium, even in someone with dementia.

Source: MedlinePlus: Delirium, What is delirium?; symptoms, causes, risk factors and diagnosis. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC III. Diagnosis and Treatment · Diagnosis (including differentials) · NPCB 02 Diagnose · Older adult · PMHNP-18

Question 19 of 40

A 70-year-old woman in treatment for depression has decision-making capacity and has told the PMHNP she doesn't want her son to know about her care. Her son calls, worried, and asks about her diagnosis and medications. Her son is not her legal personal representative, and there is no serious or imminent threat or other applicable disclosure exception. What does HHS HIPAA guidance direct?

  • A. Share her diagnosis, since he is her next of kin and is clearly worried.
  • B. Listen to his concerns, but don't disclose her information.
  • C. Share only her medication list.
  • D. Share everything, since she's over 65.

Answer: B. Listen to his concerns, but don't disclose her information.

HHS guidance says that when an adult patient with capacity objects to sharing information with family, the provider must respect her wishes in this family-involvement situation. A serious and imminent threat can permit disclosure to a family member able to lessen it, but that exception is absent here. HHS even gives the example of a nurse who may not discuss a patient's condition with her brother after she said she didn't want family to know. HIPAA doesn't stop you from listening to family concerns and factoring them into care.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. Being next of kin doesn't override an objection from a patient who has capacity.
  • C. A medication list is still her health information, and she objected.
  • D. Age doesn't change her privacy rights or her capacity.

Takeaway: For this family-information request, the patient's informed objection stands: you can listen without disclosing her information.

Source: HHS OCR: HIPAA Privacy Rule and Sharing Information Related to Mental Health, PDF pp. 2–3; adult objection to family disclosure and receiving information from family. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC V. Ethics, Legal Principles, and Cultural Care · Scope of confidentiality (release of information) · NPCB 04 Evaluate · Older adult · PMHNP-19

Question 20 of 40

A 38-year-old man taking fluoxetine 40 mg daily was prescribed tramadol for back pain four days ago. He now has agitation, heavy sweating, tremor, muscle twitching (myoclonus), brisk reflexes, diarrhea, and a temperature of 38.4 °C. He takes no antipsychotic and has not missed any fluoxetine doses. Which condition is most likely?

  • A. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome
  • B. Antidepressant discontinuation syndrome
  • C. SSRI-associated hyponatremia
  • D. Serotonin syndrome

Answer: D. Serotonin syndrome

Tramadol is one of the serotonergic drugs the fluoxetine label names as raising the risk of serotonin syndrome. His picture matches the label's three clusters: mental status change (agitation), autonomic instability (sweating, fever), and neuromuscular signs (tremor, myoclonus, hyperreflexia), plus diarrhea. The label directs stopping fluoxetine and the other serotonergic drug and starting supportive treatment, so he needs urgent evaluation.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. NMS is linked to antipsychotics, and he takes none. Myoclonus and brisk reflexes right after a new serotonergic drug point elsewhere.
  • B. Discontinuation symptoms follow stopping or reducing an antidepressant. He has done neither.
  • C. The label describes hyponatremia with headache, confusion, weakness, and unsteadiness. It doesn't explain fever, sweating, and myoclonus appearing right after a new serotonergic drug.

Takeaway: New serotonergic drug plus autonomic signs plus neuromuscular hyperactivity points to serotonin syndrome.

Sources: Prozac (fluoxetine) prescribing information, Lilly, sections 5.2, 5.9 and 5.15; DailyMed: Haloperidol oral solution prescribing information, Warnings: Tardive Dyskinesia; Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome; Adverse Reactions: Dystonia. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC I. Scientific Foundation · Advanced psychopharmacology (pharmacodynamics) · NPCB 02 Diagnose · Adult · PMHNP-20

Question 21 of 40

A 45-year-old woman screens positive on the ASQ because she had thoughts of killing herself two weeks ago. She denies having those thoughts right now. What is the next step?

  • A. Document low risk because she denies current thoughts.
  • B. Send her to the emergency department, since every positive screen means imminent risk.
  • C. Diagnose major depressive disorder based on the positive screen.
  • D. Complete a brief suicide safety assessment, then choose a disposition.

Answer: D. Complete a brief suicide safety assessment, then choose a disposition.

NIMH's Brief Suicide Safety Assessment is designed for this moment. It follows a positive screen and covers how often the thoughts occur, any plan and access to means, intent, past suicidal behavior (the strongest risk factor for future attempts), symptoms, and supports. Only then is a disposition chosen.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. Denying current thoughts doesn't complete the assessment. NIMH notes that even a "no" to needing help doesn't mean a patient is safe.
  • B. Emergency evaluation is the NIMH disposition for imminent risk, meaning current suicidal thoughts. Other positive screens lead to other dispositions after assessment.
  • C. A suicide-risk screen isn't a diagnostic instrument for depression.

Takeaway: A positive screen starts the assessment. It doesn't finish it.

Source: NIMH ASQ Toolkit: Adult Outpatient Brief Suicide Safety Assessment, PDF pp. 1–2; initial instructions, step 2 assessment and step 4 disposition. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC II. Advanced Practice Skills · Risk assessment · NPCB 01 Assess · Adult · PMHNP-21

Question 22 of 40

A 17-year-old high school senior was recently stabilized after a first episode of psychosis. He wants to graduate on time and agrees to involve his mother in his care. Which service model combines clinical treatment with family and school support for first-episode psychosis?

  • A. Coordinated specialty care from a team that includes family and school support
  • B. Monthly medication checks with a prescriber and no other services
  • C. School accommodations through his high school without ongoing clinical care
  • D. Waiting to see whether a second episode occurs before starting ongoing treatment

Answer: A. Coordinated specialty care from a team that includes family and school support

NIMH's RAISE research found that team-based coordinated specialty care produced better clinical and functional outcomes than typical community care, and worked best when started soon after psychotic symptoms began. The team offers recovery-oriented psychotherapy, medication management, family education and support, case management, and help with work or school. That lines up with his goals.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • B. Medication management is one piece of coordinated specialty care, not the whole model.
  • C. Educational support helps, but without clinical follow-up it leaves out most of what worked in RAISE.
  • D. RAISE found treatment works best soon after symptoms begin.

Takeaway: First-episode psychosis: coordinated specialty care, started early.

Source: NIMH: RAISE-ing the Standard of Care for Schizophrenia, Coordinated specialty care; Results of RAISE research. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC III. Diagnosis and Treatment · Evidence-based practice · NPCB 03 Plan · Adolescent · PMHNP-22

Question 23 of 40

A 27-year-old woman with borderline personality disorder has intense mood swings, stormy relationships, and repeated self-injury during conflicts. Which listed psychotherapy was developed for borderline personality disorder and teaches skills to manage emotions and relationships?

  • A. Exposure and response prevention
  • B. Cognitive processing therapy
  • C. Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT)
  • D. Parent training in behavior management

Answer: C. Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT)

NIMH describes DBT as a therapy developed specifically for people with borderline personality disorder. It teaches mindfulness and skills to manage intense emotions, reduce self-destructive behavior, and improve relationships. Those treatment targets fit this presentation.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. ERP treats OCD by approaching feared triggers while resisting compulsions. It is not the BPD-focused skills treatment described here.
  • B. CPT is a trauma-focused therapy recommended for PTSD.
  • D. That's a first-line treatment for ADHD in young children.

Takeaway: Borderline personality disorder with self-injury: DBT.

Sources: NIMH: Borderline Personality Disorder, How is borderline personality disorder treated?; Psychotherapy; DBT; NIMH: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Treatment: Psychotherapy; Exposure and response prevention; VA National Center for PTSD: Overview of Psychotherapy for PTSD, Recommended individual trauma-focused therapies; CDC: Treatment of ADHD, Treatment recommendations; By Age Group; Behavior therapy. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC IV. Psychotherapy and Related Theories · Psychotherapy principles · NPCB 03 Plan · Adult · PMHNP-23

Question 24 of 40

A 44-year-old man says his religious community discourages psychiatric medication and that he would rather lean on prayer and his faith community, but he still wants help with his depression. Which response best reflects culturally responsive care?

  • A. Explain that medication is his only effective option and that his beliefs are a barrier.
  • B. Ask how his beliefs shape his preferences and plan with him from options he accepts.
  • C. Read a general description of his religion and apply it to him.
  • D. Ask his brother what the family would prefer.

Answer: B. Ask how his beliefs shape his preferences and plan with him from options he accepts.

The National CLAS Standards' principal standard calls for care that is effective, understandable, and respectful and that responds to a person's cultural health beliefs and practices. The way to learn this man's beliefs is to ask him, and then build the plan with him.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. That dismisses his health beliefs instead of responding to them.
  • C. Background reading can help, but it can't tell you what this person believes or wants.
  • D. He's an adult who can speak for himself, and the preferences that matter are his.

Takeaway: Culturally responsive care starts with asking this patient, not a stereotype or a relative.

Source: HHS Office of Minority Health: National CLAS Standards, Principal Standard. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC V. Ethics, Legal Principles, and Cultural Care · Cultural and spiritual competence · NPCB 01 Assess · Adult · PMHNP-24

Question 25 of 40

The parent of a 16-year-old asks why her son, who makes careful decisions at home, takes more risks when he's with friends. Which explanation best reflects current understanding of adolescent brain development?

  • A. His brain finished developing once it reached adult size in early adolescence.
  • B. His prefrontal cortex is still maturing, and peers weigh heavily at this age.
  • C. Risk-taking in adolescence is driven only by hormone changes during puberty.
  • D. Risky choices in adolescence usually indicate an emerging mental illness.

Answer: B. His prefrontal cortex is still maturing, and peers weigh heavily at this age.

NIMH explains that the brain stops growing in size by early adolescence but keeps developing into the mid-to-late 20s. The prefrontal cortex, which handles planning, prioritizing, and decision-making, is one of the last areas to mature. Along with a stronger focus on peer relationships, that ongoing development may lead teens to take more risks. NIMH also notes those risks can be positive, like joining a new club.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. Size and maturity aren't the same. Development continues well after growth stops.
  • C. "Only" is the problem. The NIMH explanation centers on brain development and social context.
  • D. Some mental illnesses do emerge in adolescence, but risk-taking with peers isn't itself a sign of one.

Takeaway: The prefrontal cortex is one of the last areas to mature; development continues into the mid-to-late 20s. Peer relationships also influence adolescent choices.

Source: NIMH: The Teen Brain—7 Things to Know, Items 1–2. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC I. Scientific Foundation · Neurodevelopment · NPCB 01 Assess · Adolescent · PMHNP-25

Question 26 of 40

A 66-year-old man presents with his first episode of major depression, and the PMHNP plans to start citalopram. Before the first dose, which assessment does antidepressant labeling specifically call for?

  • A. An electroencephalogram (EEG) to rule out a seizure disorder
  • B. A baseline serum citalopram level
  • C. A baseline thyroid ultrasound
  • D. A personal and family history screen for bipolar disorder

Answer: D. A personal and family history screen for bipolar disorder

Citalopram's label says to screen for any personal or family history of bipolar disorder, mania, or hypomania before starting citalopram or any other antidepressant. Treating a depressive episode with an antidepressant alone in someone with bipolar disorder can precipitate a mixed or manic episode. At 66, remember the other citalopram rule too: his maximum dose is 20 mg per day.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. The labeling doesn't call for an EEG before an antidepressant.
  • B. The label does not call for a pretreatment citalopram concentration; it specifically calls for bipolar-disorder screening.
  • C. That isn't part of antidepressant pre-treatment screening.

Takeaway: Before any antidepressant, ask about personal and family history of bipolar disorder, mania, or hypomania.

Sources: Celexa (citalopram) prescribing information, AbbVie, sections 2.2–2.3 and 5.5; Prozac (fluoxetine) prescribing information, Lilly, section 5.4. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC II. Advanced Practice Skills · Mental health screening tool selection and interpretation · NPCB 01 Assess · Older adult · PMHNP-26

Question 27 of 40

Before starting lithium for a 31-year-old woman with bipolar I disorder, which set of evaluations does the lithium prescribing information list?

  • A. Kidney and thyroid function, electrolytes, vitals, other medications, pregnancy status
  • B. Liver enzymes and serum lipase only
  • C. A serum lithium level before the first dose, plus liver enzymes and a blood count
  • D. HLA-B\*1502 genotyping

Answer: A. Kidney and thyroid function, electrolytes, vitals, other medications, pregnancy status

The lithium label's pre-treatment screening section lists exactly these: renal function, vital signs, serum electrolytes, and thyroid function, plus a review of concurrent medications and, for women of childbearing potential, pregnancy status and potential. The cited lithium carbonate capsule label calls for the first serum lithium concentration after 3 days of treatment, drawn 12 hours after the last dose.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • B. Lithium is cleared by the kidneys and affects the thyroid, which is why those appear on the list. Liver enzymes and lipase aren't the screening set.
  • C. A pretreatment lithium concentration does not replace the required baseline evaluation. The cited capsule label schedules the initial treatment-monitoring level after 3 days, 12 hours after the last dose.
  • D. That's the carbamazepine screen, not a lithium one.

Takeaway: Before lithium: kidneys, thyroid, electrolytes, vitals, current medications, and pregnancy status.

Sources: DailyMed: Lithium carbonate capsules, Glenmark, sections 2.1–2.2; pretreatment screening and initial concentration; DailyMed: Carbamazepine extended-release capsules, ANI, Boxed Warning: Serious Dermatologic Reactions and HLA-B\*1502 Allele. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC III. Diagnosis and Treatment · Diagnostic and laboratory test selection and interpretation · NPCB 01 Assess · Adult · PMHNP-27

Question 28 of 40

A 74-year-old woman hospitalized with severe depression in a Medicare-participating hospital has decision-making capacity. After hearing about electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), she declines it. Her daughter insists the team proceed. This is not an emergency, and there is no court order authorizing treatment. Under the federal hospital patients' rights rule, what's correct?

  • A. Her daughter can consent on her behalf because the patient is over 70 years old.
  • B. ECT can proceed because the team believes it's the most effective option.
  • C. She may refuse treatment after an informed decision, so her choice stands.
  • D. Patients may refuse medications, but not procedures.

Answer: C. She may refuse treatment after an informed decision, so her choice stands.

The rule gives a patient, or her representative as allowed under state law, the right to make informed decisions about her care. That includes being informed of her health status, being involved in care planning, and being able to request or refuse treatment. She has capacity and has decided. Her age doesn't hand the decision to her daughter.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. Age doesn't transfer decision-making. A representative's role depends on state law, not on a family member's preference.
  • B. Clinical opinion doesn't override an informed refusal by a patient with capacity.
  • D. The right to refuse treatment isn't limited to medications.

Takeaway: A patient with capacity can refuse treatment, including a strongly recommended one.

Source: 42 CFR 482.13: Hospital patients' rights, paragraph (b)(2), informed decisions and treatment refusal. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC V. Ethics, Legal Principles, and Cultural Care · Patient's Bill of Rights (informed consent, treatment options) · NPCB 04 Evaluate · Older adult · PMHNP-28

Question 29 of 40

A 17-year-old boy received his first doses of haloperidol for acute psychosis two days ago. His parent reports sudden, sustained twisting of his neck and new trouble swallowing. He is alert and afebrile, and his vital signs are normal. Which adverse effect best explains these findings?

  • A. Tardive dyskinesia
  • B. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome
  • C. Acute dystonia
  • D. Serotonin syndrome

Answer: C. Acute dystonia

The haloperidol label describes dystonia as prolonged abnormal muscle contractions in the first few days of treatment, including neck spasm that can progress to throat tightness and trouble swallowing or breathing. It is more common with high-potency, higher-dose first-generation antipsychotics and in males and younger patients, which fits him exactly. New swallowing difficulty with throat or neck dystonia needs immediate medical assessment because the airway may be involved.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. Tardive dyskinesia is generally associated with cumulative exposure, although brief exposure does not make it impossible. Sudden sustained neck contraction and dysphagia in the first days fit the label's description of acute dystonia.
  • B. The focal sustained contraction, absence of fever and normal vital signs favor acute dystonia over the NMS cluster described in the label. The vignette does not describe the characteristic combination of hyperpyrexia, muscle rigidity, altered mental status and autonomic instability.
  • D. The newly introduced drug and sustained neck contraction fit acute dystonia better than serotonin syndrome. No serotonergic exposure is described in the vignette.

Takeaway: Young male, high-potency first-generation antipsychotic, first few days, sustained contraction: think acute dystonia.

Sources: DailyMed: Haloperidol oral solution prescribing information, Adverse Reactions: Dystonia; Warnings: Tardive Dyskinesia and Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome; Prozac (fluoxetine) prescribing information, Lilly, section 5.2, serotonin syndrome. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC I. Scientific Foundation · Advanced psychopharmacology (EPS) · NPCB 02 Diagnose · Adolescent · PMHNP-29

Question 30 of 40

A 16-year-old hospital inpatient is pacing, yelling, and slamming a door after a phone call with his father. He hasn't hurt anyone and isn't threatening staff; staff assess no immediate threat to anyone's physical safety. The hospital participates in Medicare. What should staff do first?

  • A. Place him in seclusion now to prevent escalation.
  • B. Start with nonphysical de-escalation and other less restrictive steps.
  • C. Apply restraints now and obtain the order afterward.
  • D. Write a standing PRN order for seclusion in case he yells again.

Answer: B. Start with nonphysical de-escalation and other less restrictive steps.

Under the federal hospital patients' rights rule, restraint or seclusion may be used only to ensure the immediate physical safety of the patient, staff, or others, and only after less restrictive interventions have been found ineffective. It must be the least restrictive option that works. Staff training explicitly includes nonphysical intervention skills.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. Seclusion is for violent or self-destructive behavior that threatens immediate physical safety. Pacing and yelling haven't reached that point.
  • C. Without an immediate threat to physical safety, restraint isn't justified under the rule at all, whatever the paperwork.
  • D. The rule prohibits standing or as-needed (PRN) orders for restraint or seclusion.

Takeaway: When there is no immediate physical danger, use nonphysical de-escalation and less restrictive measures. Restraint or seclusion cannot be ordered PRN.

Source: 42 CFR 482.13: Hospital patients' rights, paragraphs (e)(1)–(3), (e)(6) and (f)(2)(ii)–(iii). Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC II. Advanced Practice Skills · Psychiatric emergency management · NPCB 03 Plan · Adolescent · PMHNP-30

Question 31 of 40

A 4-year-old boy has been diagnosed with ADHD and has not yet received treatment. His parents are open to any treatment, and a program that trains parents in behavior management is available nearby. What do the AAP recommendations, as summarized by the CDC, advise first?

  • A. Start a stimulant, then add parent training if needed.
  • B. Wait until he starts elementary school before treating.
  • C. Weekly individual play therapy for the child alone, without parent involvement
  • D. Parent training in behavior management, before medication is tried

Answer: D. Parent training in behavior management, before medication is tried

For children with ADHD younger than 6, the CDC summary of AAP recommendations names parent training in behavior management as the first line of treatment, before medication. CDC notes that it works as well as medication in young children, that young children have more side effects from ADHD medications, and that long-term medication effects in this age group aren't well studied.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. That reverses the recommended order for a child under 6.
  • B. CDC calls behavior therapy an important first step now, not something to postpone.
  • C. CDC identifies parent training in behavior management as the most effective behavior therapy for this age.

Takeaway: Under 6: parent training in behavior management first. For children 6 and older: medication plus behavior therapy.

Source: CDC: Treatment of ADHD, Treatment recommendations; By Age Group; Behavior therapy. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC III. Diagnosis and Treatment · Evidence-based practice (treatment selection) · NPCB 03 Plan · Infant and child · PMHNP-31

Question 32 of 40

After hearing feedback about his heavy drinking, a 50-year-old man says, "All my friends drink more than I do. I'm not the one with a problem." Which response best fits the motivational principles NIAAA builds into brief intervention?

  • A. "You see yourself as a lighter drinker than your friends. What do you make of your own risks?"
  • B. "Your friends aren't the issue here. You clearly have a problem, and you need to admit it today."
  • C. "If you won't agree to quit today, there's no point in continuing."
  • D. "Let's talk about how much your friends are drinking instead."

Answer: A. "You see yourself as a lighter drinker than your friends. What do you make of your own risks?"

NIAAA's brief intervention model asks clinicians to express empathy, stay focused on the patient's own drinking and risks rather than friends' habits, avoid arguing when patients push back, and support autonomy by reminding them the decision is theirs. This response reflects his view without arguing and brings the focus back to his own risks, leaving the decision with him.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • B. Arguing with pushback is exactly what NIAAA advises against.
  • C. NIAAA advises keeping the line of communication open, since change can take several visits.
  • D. That abandons the focus on his own drinking and risks.

Takeaway: Roll with resistance: reflect, don't argue, affirm autonomy, and refocus on the patient's own risks.

Source: NIAAA: Conduct a Brief Intervention—Build Motivation and a Plan for Change, Seven-step model, especially steps 2–5. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC IV. Psychotherapy and Related Theories · Psychotherapy principles (motivational interviewing) · NPCB 01 Assess · Adult · PMHNP-32

Question 33 of 40

A 24-year-old woman with major depressive disorder asks for bupropion because she wants to avoid weight gain. Her history includes bulimia nervosa, in remission for two years. She has no seizure history. Which response is best?

  • A. Bupropion is contraindicated because of her prior bulimia nervosa.
  • B. Bupropion is a good choice because her eating disorder is in remission.
  • C. Bupropion is appropriate as long as she takes it with food.
  • D. Bupropion is contraindicated in anorexia nervosa but not in bulimia nervosa.

Answer: A. Bupropion is contraindicated because of her prior bulimia nervosa.

The bupropion XL label lists a current or prior diagnosis of bulimia or anorexia nervosa as a contraindication because of a higher seizure incidence. The word that matters is "prior." Remission doesn't remove it. For context, fluoxetine carries FDA indications for both major depressive disorder and bulimia nervosa.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • B. The contraindication covers a prior diagnosis, not just active illness.
  • C. Taking it with food doesn't change a seizure-risk contraindication.
  • D. The label names both eating disorders.

Takeaway: Bupropion: no to seizure disorders and to current or prior bulimia or anorexia nervosa.

Sources: DailyMed: Bupropion hydrochloride extended-release tablets (XL), Camber, Section 4, Contraindications; Prozac (fluoxetine) prescribing information, Lilly, section 1, major depressive disorder and bulimia nervosa indications. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC I. Scientific Foundation · Advanced pharmacology (contraindications) · NPCB 01 Assess · Adult · PMHNP-33

Question 34 of 40

A father has worked full time for two years at an FMLA-covered company with 200 employees at his location. His 8-year-old daughter is starting an intensive outpatient program for severe anxiety with repeated periods when she cannot attend school and ongoing treatment by a health care provider. He asks how to protect his job while he takes her to treatment. Which statement is accurate?

  • A. The FMLA guarantees him 12 weeks of paid leave from his employer each year.
  • B. The FMLA covers only an employee's own serious illness, not a child's illness.
  • C. If eligible, he may take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid, job-protected leave.
  • D. Mental health conditions are excluded from the FMLA.

Answer: C. If eligible, he may take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid, job-protected leave.

The FMLA gives eligible employees of covered employers up to 12 workweeks of job-protected leave in a 12-month period, including to care for a child with a serious mental or physical health condition. Eligibility means at least 12 months with the employer, 1,250 hours worked in the prior 12 months, and at least 50 employees within 75 miles. The FMLA itself does not guarantee pay; it may run concurrently with employer-provided paid leave, and it can be taken intermittently when medically necessary.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. The FMLA itself guarantees eligible leave and job protection, not pay. Employer-provided paid leave may run at the same time.
  • B. Caring for a child with a serious health condition is one of the covered reasons.
  • D. DOL materials expressly include serious mental health conditions.

Takeaway: FMLA: up to 12 unpaid, job-protected workweeks, including care for a child's serious mental health condition.

Sources: U.S. Department of Labor: Fact Sheet 28O—Mental Health Conditions and the FMLA, About the FMLA; qualifying serious mental health conditions; care for a child; 29 CFR 825.202: Intermittent leave or reduced leave schedule, (a)–(b), especially (b)(1)–(2). Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC V. Ethics, Legal Principles, and Cultural Care · Patient advocacy (FMLA) · NPCB 03 Plan · Infant and child · PMHNP-34

Question 35 of 40

A 15-year-old girl with major depressive disorder is starting fluoxetine. Which monitoring plan best follows the labeling?

  • A. No extra monitoring, since fluoxetine is approved for adolescents
  • B. Close monitoring early and after dose changes, with family watching daily
  • C. A serum fluoxetine level every week
  • D. Monitoring only if she reports new suicidal thoughts at a visit on her own

Answer: B. Close monitoring early and after dose changes, with family watching daily

Fluoxetine is FDA-approved for major depressive disorder in pediatric patients 8 to 18, and it carries the antidepressant boxed warning for suicidal thinking and behavior in children, adolescents, and young adults. The label calls for close observation for clinical worsening, suicidality, and unusual behavior changes, especially in the first few months and at dose changes. It asks families to observe daily and report changes. It also recommends periodic height and weight checks and monitoring for mania in pediatric patients.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. FDA approval and the boxed warning go together. Approval doesn't waive monitoring.
  • C. The label doesn't call for routine drug levels.
  • D. The label puts the burden on close observation by clinicians and family, not on self-report alone.

Takeaway: Antidepressants in youth: close monitoring early and at dose changes, and enlist the family.

Source: Prozac (fluoxetine) prescribing information, Lilly, Boxed Warning; sections 5.1 and 8.4. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC III. Diagnosis and Treatment · Psychopharmacotherapeutic management (monitoring) · NPCB 04 Evaluate · Adolescent · PMHNP-35

Question 36 of 40

A 19-year-old college student with bipolar I disorder, stable on lithium, asks whether a few drinks at parties is safe for him. According to NIAAA's brief intervention guidance, which advice fits best?

  • A. Up to two drinks a day is considered low risk for men, so moderate drinking is fine.
  • B. Drinking is fine as long as he takes his lithium with food.
  • C. Skip the topic, since he asked about social situations, not his health.
  • D. Advise him not to drink: he's under 21, and alcohol can worsen his condition.

Answer: D. Advise him not to drink: he's under 21, and alcohol can worsen his condition.

NIAAA lists groups who should be advised not to drink at all. They include people younger than the legal drinking age of 21, people with a medical condition caused or worsened by drinking (bipolar disorder is one example given), and people taking certain medications. He checks more than one box.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. A population drinking limit does not establish safety for this patient. NIAAA advises abstinence in the circumstances described here.
  • B. Food timing doesn't change the reasons NIAAA gives for advising him not to drink.
  • C. His question is a natural opening for exactly this health conversation.

Takeaway: NIAAA advises no alcohol for anyone under 21, for conditions alcohol worsens (bipolar disorder included), and with certain medications.

Source: NIAAA: Conduct a Brief Intervention—Build Motivation and a Plan for Change, Seven-step model, especially steps 2–5. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC II. Advanced Practice Skills · Health promotion and disease prevention · NPCB 03 Plan · Adolescent · PMHNP-36

Question 37 of 40

An 81-year-old woman who takes hydrochlorothiazide started fluoxetine three weeks ago. Her daughter reports new confusion, headache, unsteadiness, and a fall. Her serum sodium is 121 mEq/L. Which explanation should be considered first?

  • A. Worsening depression presenting as cognitive decline
  • B. Serotonin syndrome
  • C. Expected early fluoxetine side effects that will pass
  • D. SSRI-associated hyponatremia, often from SIADH

Answer: D. SSRI-associated hyponatremia, often from SIADH

The fluoxetine label warns that SSRIs can cause hyponatremia, often through the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH). Older adults and people taking diuretics are at greater risk. Her symptoms (headache, confusion, unsteadiness leading to a fall) are the ones the label lists. The label says to consider stopping fluoxetine when hyponatremia is symptomatic and to start appropriate medical treatment. With new confusion and a fall, she needs urgent medical evaluation.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. A measured sodium of 121 mEq/L with new symptoms points to a medical cause that needs attention first.
  • B. The stem establishes symptomatic hyponatremia and does not establish the autonomic and neuromuscular syndrome described in the serotonin-syndrome warning. Taking an SSRI alone does not establish serotonin syndrome.
  • C. Symptomatic hyponatremia can progress to seizures and worse. It isn't something to wait out.

Takeaway: Older adult plus diuretic plus new SSRI plus confusion: check the sodium.

Source: Prozac (fluoxetine) prescribing information, Lilly, sections 5.2, 5.9 and 8.5. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC I. Scientific Foundation · Advanced pathophysiology · NPCB 02 Diagnose · Older adult · PMHNP-37

Question 38 of 40

After a completed suicide safety assessment, a 52-year-old man is not at imminent risk and will follow up as an outpatient. He mentions a stockpile of old prescription pills at home. Which plan best fits current guidance?

  • A. Write a safety plan with coping steps and contacts, and plan how to secure the pills.
  • B. Have him sign a no-self-harm contract and schedule a routine follow-up visit in a month.
  • C. Give him the crisis line number and schedule a follow-up visit.
  • D. Avoid mentioning the pills so he doesn't feel judged.

Answer: A. Write a safety plan with coping steps and contacts, and plan how to secure the pills.

NIMH separates a safety plan from a safety contract. The plan names coping strategies and the people or services the patient will reach out to. It also includes means restriction, because limiting access to dangerous objects saves lives. Pills at home make that conversation essential.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • B. NIMH states that asking a patient to contract for safety is not effective and may be dangerous.
  • C. Crisis numbers belong in the plan, but on their own they leave out coping steps, supports, and the pills.
  • D. Skipping means counseling leaves access to potentially lethal medication unaddressed.

Takeaway: Safety plan, not safety contract, and always ask how lethal means will be secured.

Source: NIMH ASQ Toolkit: Adult Outpatient Brief Suicide Safety Assessment, PDF p. 2; step 3, safety plan and means safety. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC II. Advanced Practice Skills · Risk assessment (safety planning) · NPCB 03 Plan · Adult · PMHNP-38

Question 39 of 40

A 26-year-old woman taking citalopram says she has started St. John's wort from a health-food store to boost her mood. Which risk is most important to discuss?

  • A. There's no interaction concern, since St. John's wort is natural.
  • B. It blocks citalopram's QT effect, so higher citalopram doses become safe.
  • C. Combining it with citalopram raises the risk of serotonin syndrome.
  • D. The only concern is mild daytime drowsiness.

Answer: C. Combining it with citalopram raises the risk of serotonin syndrome.

Citalopram's label lists St. John's wort among the serotonergic products that increase the risk of serotonin syndrome when combined with an SSRI. It asks clinicians to monitor for it and asks patients to tell their provider about herbal supplements. That's why supplements belong in every medication review.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. "Natural" doesn't mean free of interactions, and the label names this one.
  • B. Nothing in the labeling supports that, and citalopram's dose limits still apply.
  • D. That misses the serotonin syndrome risk the label identifies.

Takeaway: St. John's wort plus an SSRI means serotonin syndrome risk. Always ask about supplements.

Source: Celexa (citalopram) prescribing information, AbbVie, sections 5.3 and 7; Medication Guide. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC III. Diagnosis and Treatment · Complementary and alternative treatments · NPCB 01 Assess · Adult · PMHNP-39

Question 40 of 40

A 28-year-old woman is starting lithium for bipolar I disorder. Which teaching point is most important to include?

  • A. Cut back on salt in your diet to help prevent weight gain and swelling over time.
  • B. Keep salt and fluids steady, avoid dehydration, and ask before taking ibuprofen.
  • C. Adjust your dose yourself based on how you feel.
  • D. If you miss a dose, take a double dose next time.

Answer: B. Keep salt and fluids steady, avoid dehydration, and ask before taking ibuprofen.

The lithium label asks patients to keep a normal diet that includes salt and to drink enough fluid, and it warns that sweating, diarrhea, and fever reduce tolerance. It also names NSAIDs among drugs that raise lithium levels. The counseling section adds that patients shouldn't change their own dose, shouldn't double a missed dose, and should report toxicity signs such as diarrhea, vomiting, tremor, lack of coordination, and drowsiness.

Why the other choices don't fit

  • A. Sodium loss reduces lithium clearance and raises the level. The label asks for a normal diet that includes salt.
  • C. The label tells patients not to adjust the dose without their prescriber.
  • D. The label specifically says not to double a missed dose.

Takeaway: Lithium teaching: steady salt and fluids, no DIY dosing, ask before NSAIDs, and know the toxicity signs.

Source: DailyMed: Lithium carbonate capsules, Glenmark, sections 5.1, 5.3, 7.1 and 17; Medication Guide. Checked September 22, 2026.

Study tags: ANCC II. Advanced Practice Skills · Psychoeducation (topic selection) · NPCB 03 Plan · Adult · PMHNP-40

Answer key

Answer key table 1
Questions 1–10Questions 11–20Questions 21–30Questions 31–40
1. B11. C21. D31. D
2. C12. A22. A32. A
3. A13. C23. C33. A
4. D14. A24. B34. C
5. A15. D25. B35. B
6. D16. B26. D36. D
7. B17. A27. A37. D
8. C18. C28. C38. A
9. D19. B29. C39. C
10. B20. D30. B40. B

Score your practice run

Count your correct answers. Give yourself one point for each correct answer recorded before its explanation was revealed; a blank earns no point. Your full-set result is correct ÷ 40 × 100, rounded to one decimal place, so each correct answer adds 2.5 percentage points. Record how many of the 40 you answered and how many you left unanswered.

For example, 8 correct among 10 answered is 8/40 = 20.0% of the full set, with 30 unanswered. It is also 80.0% among answered questions, which is a different denominator. With no questions answered, accuracy among answered questions is undefined—not 0% knowledge.

Then use the table for your exam to see where your misses cluster.

By ANCC domain (PMHNP-BC)

By ANCC domain (PMHNP-BC) table 2
ANCC domainQuestion numbersQuestionsYour correct
I. Scientific Foundation1, 6, 11, 16, 20, 25, 29, 33, 379___
II. Advanced Practice Skills2, 5, 9, 12, 17, 21, 26, 30, 36, 38, 4011___
III. Diagnosis and Treatment3, 8, 13, 18, 22, 27, 31, 35, 399___
IV. Psychotherapy and Related Theories7, 14, 23, 324___
V. Ethics, Legal Principles, and Cultural Care4, 10, 15, 19, 24, 28, 347___
Total40___

By NPCB domain (NPCB PMHNP)

By NPCB domain (NPCB PMHNP) table 3
NPCB domainQuestion numbersQuestionsYour correct
01 Assess7, 11, 12, 15, 17, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 32, 33, 3913___
02 Diagnose3, 5, 6, 9, 18, 20, 29, 378___
03 Plan2, 8, 14, 22, 23, 30, 31, 34, 36, 38, 4011___
04 Evaluate1, 4, 10, 13, 16, 19, 28, 358___
Total40___

The domain names come from the respective boards. Assigning these original questions to a domain is our editorial classification, including the NPCB cross-tags; neither board has validated this set.

How to read your result

Your result describes these 40 questions only. It isn't a scaled score, and it doesn't predict whether you'll pass. ANCC reports a pass or fail based on a scaled score of 350 on a scale that tops out at 500, and its handbook gives no percentage-correct equivalent. NPCB says its scores aren't reported as a percentage of correct answers. So no percentage on this page converts to a pass. See the ANCC scoring explanation (printed p. 9) and NPCB scoring explanation (printed p. 10).

Small samples swing hard. In the 4-question Psychotherapy and Related Theories domain, one question moves your domain score by 25 percentage points. Review the specific distinctions you missed rather than ranking readiness from raw miss counts across unequal domain sizes. These small samples do not establish mastery or reliably distinguish a strongest and weakest domain.

Turn your misses into study targets

A missed question is a study prompt, not a verdict. For each miss, and for each guess you got right, write down the distinction you missed, read the linked source, and explain why the closest wrong answer doesn't fit. Come back in a few days and answer those questions again before you open the explanations.

Turn your misses into study targets table 4
QuestionDistinction I missedSource to rereadWhat I'll explain on the retry
Example: 1Age over 60 caps citalopram at 20 mgCelexa label, section 2.3Why a QTc under 500 ms doesn't allow 40 mg
Row 2
Row 3

How this set maps to the two PMHNP exams

The set approximates ANCC's five-domain distribution and adds editorial NPCB domain and age tags for shared topics. Matching broad counts does not reproduce either exam's difficulty, task mix, or full coverage.

How this set maps to the two PMHNP exams table 5
ANCC domainANCC scored itemsShareThis setShare
I. Scientific Foundation3322.0%922.5%
II. Advanced Practice Skills4127.3%1127.5%
III. Diagnosis and Treatment3322.0%922.5%
IV. Psychotherapy and Related Theories1711.3%410.0%
V. Ethics, Legal Principles, and Cultural Care2617.3%717.5%
Total150100%40100%
How this set maps to the two PMHNP exams table 6
NPCB domainNPCB scored itemsShareThis setShare
01 Assess4533.3%1332.5%
02 Diagnose2820.7%820.0%
03 Plan3525.9%1127.5%
04 Evaluate2720.0%820.0%
Total135100%40100%
How this set maps to the two PMHNP exams table 7
Patient age group (NPCB)NPCB scored itemsShareThis setShare
Infant and child85.9%25.0%
Pre-adolescent118.1%37.5%
Adolescent2216.3%717.5%
Adult6749.6%2050.0%
Older adult2720.0%820.0%
Total135100%40100%

Shares are our arithmetic from the published item counts, rounded to one decimal place. Rounded domain or age percentages may not add to 100.0%; the total is calculated from the complete item counts. They describe coverage, not difficulty, and they aren't a guide to how long to study each area. ANCC's own outline prints rounded percentages that add to 99%, which it attributes to rounding. Counts come from the ANCC PMHNP test content outline (effective April 28, 2023) and the NPCB PMHNP Candidate Handbook, Appendix A (updated 06/2026).

NPCB does not define these age groups numerically in its outline. Our age tags are editorial descriptions of the practice cases, not official age cutoffs or proof of a matched lifespan examination. The ANCC PDF's July 28, 2026 update footer does not replace its stated April 28, 2023 effective date.

What this set doesn't cover. There is no dedicated question on the mental status exam, the Transtheoretical Model, family theories, or the ANA Psychiatric-Mental Health Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice. Recovery appears within coordinated specialty care, and neurodevelopment appears in an adolescent case, but those questions do not cover the full recovery, resilience, and developmental-theory topics. All of those appear on ANCC's outline, so study them separately. A 40-question sample can't cover everything, and we'd rather tell you what's missing.

About the format. Every question here is single best answer with four choices. ANCC and NPCB both describe their exams as multiple-choice. Neither document we checked says every item has exactly four options, so don't read our format as a copy of theirs.

What the real exams look like

What the real exams look like table 8
Column 1ANCC PMHNP (Across the Lifespan)NPCB PMHNP
CredentialPMHNP-BCNP-C
Questions175: 150 scored, 25 unscored pretest150: 135 scored, 15 unscored pretest
Time3.5 hours3 hours
Average pace72 seconds per question72 seconds per question
Blueprint5 content domains, outline effective April 28, 20234 practice domains plus patient age groups, handbook updated 06/2026
PassingScaled score of 350 (scale maximum 500)Set by standard setting; not reported as a percentage

Sources: ANCC PMHNP certification page; ANCC Certification Handbook, Version 4 (January 23, 2026), printed pp. 8–9 and 14–15; ANCC test content outline, p. 1; NPCB PMHNP Candidate Handbook, pp. 8, 10, and 12. The pace row is our arithmetic: 210 minutes ÷ 175 questions and 180 minutes ÷ 150 questions both come to 1.2 minutes.

ANCC says its pretest questions can't be told apart from the scored ones, and there's no penalty for guessing, so answer every question. For an optional self-timed exercise, 40 questions at that average pace takes 48 minutes. Untimed study is fine; that calculation does not establish matched difficulty or individual question timing.

For current application and eligibility information, use the ANCC PMHNP certification page or NPCB's PMHNP exam page. These are certification resources; this practice score does not determine eligibility or permission to practice.

More free official practice

ANCC's PMHNP sample test questions are a free, untimed resource that can be repeated. ANCC says its samples do not cover the full range of exam content or difficulty. They are an optional next exercise after this set, not a prerequisite for seeing any answer here.

Skip anything sold as "recalled" or "real" exam questions. ANCC candidates sign an agreement not to share exam content, and ANCC says violating it can cost the certification (Handbook, printed p. 15). NPCB's handbook, printed pp. 9 and 13–14, also treats exam content as confidential and says sharing it can lead to invalidated results and discipline.

Sources and how we checked

Last verified: September 22, 2026. On that date we checked the exam facts on this page against the ANCC and NPCB documents below, and we opened or read every source linked beside the explanations.

By the Castleport Test Prep Editorial Team. AI tools assisted drafting and source checking. Source checking isn't clinical review. These hypothetical cases are study exercises, not reports of real patients or clinical experience. See our methodology and corrections log.

Exam documents:

  1. ANCC, Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (Across the Lifespan) Certification: exam length, time, credential
  2. ANCC, PMHNP Test Content Outline, effective April 28, 2023: domains and scored-item counts; document updated July 28, 2026
  3. ANCC Certification Handbook, Version 4, January 23, 2026: format, scoring, guessing, exam security
  4. ANCC, PMHNP Sample Test Questions
  5. NPCB, PMHNP Candidate Handbook, updated June 2026: format, blueprint, scoring, credential
  6. NPCB, PMHNP exam page

Castleport Test Prep is an independent exam prep publisher. We aren't affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) or the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners Certification Board (AANPCB), which does business as the Nurse Practitioners Certification Board (NPCB). Exam and credential names identify their subjects, and trademarks belong to their respective owners. These practice questions are original and unofficial, they're for exam study rather than care decisions for a specific patient, and nothing here guarantees a score, certification, or licensure. Read our independence policy.