ARDMS Adult Echocardiography (AE) Exam Prep
Start your ARDMS adult echocardiography exam prep with 20 questions, then use the explanations, formula sheet, and 8-week plan to focus your review. These original, unofficial questions are text-only; they do not reproduce image or hotspot items, and your result is not a prediction of passing.
20 free AE practice questions, with explanations
Question 1 · AE-01
In a spontaneously breathing adult, peak tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity is 3.0 m/s. The inferior vena cava (IVC) measures 1.8 cm and collapses more than 50% with a sniff. There is no pulmonic stenosis. What is the estimated right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP)?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. 39 mmHg
RVSP = 4(V²) + right atrial pressure (RAP). 4 × 3.0² = 36 mmHg. An IVC of 2.1 cm or less that collapses at least 50% with a sniff gives an RAP of 3 mmHg. 36 + 3 = 39.
- A forgets to add right atrial pressure.
- C uses the intermediate RAP (8 mmHg), which is for indeterminate IVC findings.
- D uses 15 mmHg, the value for a dilated IVC (>2.1 cm) that collapses less than 50%.
Without pulmonic stenosis, right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) obstruction, or proximal pulmonary artery (PA) stenosis, RVSP equals PA systolic pressure.
Source: ASE right heart guideline (2025), Right Atrial Pressure and RVSP sections, pp. 160–164 and Table 4.
Measurement Techniques, Maneuvers, and Sonographic Views — pulmonary artery pressure (4.A.9)
Question 2 · AE-02
Isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) is the interval between:
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A
During isovolumic relaxation, both the aortic and mitral valves are closed and the left ventricular (LV) pressure falls. It ends when LV pressure drops below left atrial (LA) pressure and the mitral valve opens. You measure it with continuous-wave (CW) Doppler through the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) from an apical 5-chamber or long-axis view, catching the aortic closing click and the onset of mitral inflow.
B is isovolumic contraction. C is the PR interval. D is the early filling acceleration, not an isovolumic phase.
Why it matters: IVRT lengthens with impaired relaxation and shortens as LA pressure rises. The 2025 ASE update treats an IVRT of 70 ms or less as consistent with elevated LA pressure when it's used as a supplemental measure.
Source: ASE diastolic function update (2025), Tables 3–4, Figure 3 and Section 11, p. 554.
Anatomy and Physiology — phases of the cardiac cycle (1.B.4)
Question 3 · AE-03
LVOT diameter is 2.0 cm. LVOT velocity-time integral (VTI) is 20 cm. Aortic valve VTI by CW Doppler is 100 cm. What is the aortic valve area by the continuity equation?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. 0.63 cm²
Using the circular-LVOT assumption, aortic valve area (AVA) = (LVOT area × LVOT VTI) ÷ aortic valve (AV) VTI. LVOT area = π × (2.0 ÷ 2)² = 3.14 cm². LVOT stroke volume = 3.14 cm² × 20 cm = 62.8 mL. AVA = 62.8 cm³ ÷ 100 cm ≈ 0.63 cm².
That's in the severe range for aortic stenosis (AS; AVA under 1.0 cm²). Final AS grading integrates velocity, mean gradient, flow, and measurement quality.
- A is the VTI ratio (dimensionless index), 20 ÷ 100. Useful on its own (0.20 is below the 0.25 severe cutoff), but it's not an area.
- C uses π × diameter instead of π × radius².
- D uses the diameter as the radius, quadrupling the area.
The LVOT diameter is squared, so it's the biggest source of error in this equation. Measure it in a zoomed parasternal long-axis view, inner edge to inner edge, in mid-systole.
Source: EACVI/ASE aortic stenosis update (2017), Aortic Valve Area section, pp. 379–381, and Table 3, p. 383.
Measurement Techniques, Maneuvers, and Sonographic Views — aortic valve (4.A.1)
Question 4 · AE-04
A patient with a calcified aortic valve has: AVA 0.8 cm², mean gradient 28 mmHg, peak velocity 3.4 m/s, LV ejection fraction (LVEF) 30%, stroke volume index 28 mL/m². Measurement errors have been excluded. Which test best distinguishes true severe AS from pseudosevere AS?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D
This is low-flow, low-gradient AS with reduced EF: AVA under 1.0 cm², mean gradient under 40 mmHg, EF under 50%, SVi under 35 mL/m². A weak ventricle may not open a moderately diseased valve fully, which makes the area look small. Low-dose dobutamine increases flow. If the valve area stays at 1.0 cm² or less while velocity reaches 4 m/s or more (or mean gradient climbs past 30–40 mmHg), that suggests true severe stenosis. If the area rises above 1.0 cm², that suggests the stenosis isn't severe (pseudosevere). A stroke volume increase of more than 20% shows contractile (flow) reserve.
- A isn't the guideline tool for this question.
- B measures anatomic area, which doesn't answer whether low flow is shrinking the valve opening. Effective orifice area is the stronger outcome predictor.
- C does not assess how the valve area and gradient respond to increased flow. Inadequate flow augmentation can leave the dobutamine study inconclusive.
Source: EACVI/ASE aortic stenosis update (2017), Low Flow, Low Gradient AS with Reduced Ejection Fraction, pp. 384–385.
Pathology — aortic valve (2.A.12)
Question 5 · AE-05
Primary mitral regurgitation (MR) from a flail posterior leaflet. The MR is holosystolic. The proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) radius is 1.0 cm at an aliasing velocity of 40 cm/s, and peak MR velocity is 5.0 m/s. The flow-convergence zone is an unconstrained hemisphere, and the radius is measured at the time of peak MR velocity. What is the effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA), and what does it indicate?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C
EROA = (2πr² × Va) ÷ peak MR velocity, with radius in cm and both velocities in cm/s. Flow rate = 2 × 3.14 × 1.0² × 40 ≈ 251 mL/s. EROA = (251 mL/s) ÷ (500 cm/s) ≈ 0.50 cm². An EROA of 0.40 cm² or more is a severe-range finding in primary MR; grade severity using the integrated assessment.
- A skips the surface area entirely.
- B uses πr² (a flat circle) instead of 2πr² (a hemisphere).
- D has the right number and the wrong threshold.
The stem says holosystolic for a reason. Peak PISA EROA is a single-frame measurement, so treating it as a holosystolic value can overestimate severity when MR occurs only in late systole, as it often does with prolapse. In that case, regurgitant volume is the better index.
Source: ASE native valvular regurgitation guideline (2017), Flow Convergence (PISA) sections, pp. 312–313, and MR grading/Table 7, p. 325.
Pathology — mitral valve (2.A.13)
Question 6 · AE-06
A 58-year-old in sinus rhythm has no mitral valve disease or intervention, pulmonary parenchymal or vascular disease, constrictive pericarditis, heart transplant, or LV assist device. Measurements are: septal e′ 5 cm/s, lateral e′ 6 cm/s, average E/e′ 16, peak TR velocity 3.0 m/s (RAP can't be estimated), mitral E/A 2.2. Using the 2025 ASE algorithm, what is the diastolic function grade?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Grade 3
The 2025 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) algorithm starts with three markers:
- Reduced e′: septal ≤6 or lateral ≤7 cm/s. ✔
- Increased E/e′: average ≥14. ✔
- TR velocity ≥2.8 m/s (when RAP can't be estimated). ✔
All three abnormal means elevated LA pressure. Then grade by E/A: under 2 is grade 2; 2 or more is grade 3. E/A is 2.2, so grade 3 (marked increase in LA pressure).
- A does not fit these three abnormal markers; the all-normal branch leads to normal LA pressure and diastolic function.
- B does not fit this elevated-pressure branch. The direct grade-1 branch has reduced e′, normal E/e′ and PA pressure, and E/A ≤0.8.
- C would require an E/A under 2 in this elevated-pressure branch.
The 2025 update replaced the 2016 algorithm and starts with e′ as the marker of impaired relaxation. If your review material predates this update, check which algorithm it teaches.
Source: ASE diastolic function update (2025), Figure 3 and Section 11, pp. 553–554.
Pathology — diastolic function (2.A.4)
Question 7 · AE-07
During an agitated saline study with Valsalva release, the RA opacifies fully. No bubbles cross the atrial septum. On the seventh cardiac cycle, bubbles appear in the LA, entering from the pulmonary veins. What is the most likely explanation?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B
Agitated saline bubbles are too large to cross a normal pulmonary capillary bed. Early appearance usually suggests an intracardiac shunt, but timing alone cannot reliably localize it. Late arrival, with bubbles seen entering from the pulmonary veins rather than across the septum, points to an intrapulmonary shunt.
- A would be supported by bubbles crossing the atrial septum.
- C is wrong: in a normal study, saline bubbles stay on the right side.
- D describes left-to-right flow. A positive saline study shows bubbles moving right to left.
Source: ASE/SCAI ASD and PFO guideline (2015), Assessment of Shunting and Figure 29, p. 933; ASE cardiac source of embolism guideline (2016), p. 31, timing limitations.
Instrumentation, Optimization, and Contrast — agitated saline (5.B.1)
Question 8 · AE-08
A patient with heart failure symptoms has a septal (medial) e′ of 10 cm/s and a lateral e′ of 7 cm/s. You see respirophasic septal shift and expiratory diastolic flow reversal in the hepatic veins. Which diagnosis fits best?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A
In uncomplicated constriction, myocardial relaxation is often preserved, while the pericardium limits filling. Septal e′ is usually above 7 cm/s and often higher than lateral e′ ("annulus reversus," because the lateral wall is tethered). Ventricular interdependence produces respirophasic septal shift. Hepatic veins show expiratory diastolic reversal.
- B: restrictive cardiomyopathy is a myocardial problem, so septal e′ is usually 5 cm/s or less.
- C doesn't explain the septal shift or hepatic vein reversal.
- D causes systolic hepatic vein reversal, not expiratory diastolic reversal.
Clinical tip: preserved septal e′ together with respirophasic septal shift and expiratory hepatic diastolic reversal should raise suspicion for constriction.
Source: ASE diastolic function update (2025), Pericardial Constriction and Restrictive Cardiomyopathy sections, pp. 561–562.
Pathology — pericardial disease (2.A.16)
Question 9 · AE-09
Which of the following is an absolute contraindication to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D
Esophageal stricture is on the ASE list of absolute contraindications, along with perforated viscus, esophageal tumor, esophageal perforation or laceration, esophageal diverticulum, and active upper GI bleed.
A, B, and C are relative contraindications. Those patients are evaluated case by case, sometimes with GI clearance and precautions like limiting probe manipulation.
Source: ASE/SCA comprehensive TEE guideline (2013), Table 6, p. 927.
Clinical Care and Safety — contraindications (3.B.1)
Question 10 · AE-10
RVOT diameter is 2.5 cm with an RVOT VTI of 18 cm. LVOT diameter is 2.0 cm with an LVOT VTI of 20 cm. There is no significant aortic or pulmonic regurgitation. What is the pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio (Qp/Qs)?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C. 1.4
Stroke volume = 0.785 × diameter² × VTI. Qp (pulmonary) = 0.785 × 2.5² × 18 = 88 mL. Qs (systemic) = 0.785 × 2.0² × 20 = 63 mL. 88 ÷ 63 = 1.4, a net left-to-right shunt.
- A inverts the ratio (Qs/Qp).
- B forgets to square the diameters.
- D compares the squared diameters but ignores the VTIs.
Significant semilunar valve regurgitation distorts stroke volume and limits this method.
Source: ASE/SCAI ASD and PFO guideline (2015), Assessment of Shunting, pp. 929–930; ASE valvular regurgitation guideline (2017), stroke volume formula.
Measurement Techniques, Maneuvers, and Sonographic Views — shunt ratios (4.A.11)
Question 11 · AE-11
In the parasternal short-axis view at the papillary muscles, the LV eccentricity index is 1.3 at end-diastole and 1.0 at end-systole. This pattern most suggests:
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C
Septal flattening in diastole (LVEI over 1 at end-diastole) suggests RV volume overload: ASD, significant TR or PR, anomalous pulmonary venous drainage. Flattening in systole suggests pressure overload. Flattening at both times suggests pressure overload, with or without volume overload.
- A would flatten the septum at end-systole.
- B doesn't push the septum into a D shape.
- D: normal is an LVEI of 1 in both phases (a round LV).
Source: ASE right heart guideline (2025), Interventricular Septum section and key points, pp. 146 and 150.
Pathology — abnormal right ventricle (2.A.18 / 2.A.21)
Question 12 · AE-12
In an asymptomatic patient, you see a thin, highly mobile, filamentous structure in the right atrium near the IVC and coronary sinus entry. The most likely identification is:
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A
A Chiari network is an embryologic remnant of the right valve of the sinus venosus. It looks filamentous and moves freely near the IVC and coronary sinus entry. It's found in about 2–3% of people and is associated with PFO and atrial septal aneurysm. The eustachian valve, a related remnant, is a ridge extending forward from the IVC–RA junction.
B, C, and D are pathologic findings you'd weigh against clinical context (fever, catheters, devices, stasis). The question asks for the most likely finding in an asymptomatic patient with this appearance and location.
Source: ASE/SCAI ASD and PFO guideline (2015), Eustachian Valve and Chiari Network, p. 916.
Anatomy and Physiology — normal variants (1.A.2)
Question 13 · AE-13
While evaluating an MR jet, you lower the color scale (Nyquist limit) from 60 cm/s to 30 cm/s and change nothing else. The color jet will:
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C
A lower Nyquist limit displays slower-moving blood, including blood entrained around the jet, so the jet looks bigger. ASE recommends a Nyquist limit of 50–70 cm/s for grading regurgitant jets, with color gain set just below random speckle.
- A and D misread aliasing. Aliasing changes the colors, not the jet's presence.
- B ignores how much instrument settings and driving pressure affect jet area.
This is why you don't grade MR by jet area alone. Use an integrated assessment that includes vena contracta and quantitative measures when their acquisition requirements and limitations are satisfied.
Source: ASE native valvular regurgitation guideline (2017), Color Doppler Imaging and Table 2, p. 308.
Instrumentation, Optimization, and Contrast — Doppler settings (5.A.3)
Question 14 · AE-14
A patient with rheumatic mitral stenosis, sinus rhythm, no aortic regurgitation, and no recent valvotomy has a mitral pressure half-time of 275 ms. What is the estimated mitral valve area?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. 0.80 cm²
MVA = 220 ÷ pressure half-time. 220 ÷ 275 = 0.80 cm².
- A uses the wrong constant (150 instead of 220).
- C inverts the formula (275 ÷ 220).
- D confuses this with aortic regurgitation (AR) pressure half-time, which contributes to AR assessment; it does not calculate aortic valve area.
Know the limits. Pressure half-time is unreliable right after balloon commissurotomy and in degenerative calcific MS, and it isn't valid with severe AR. That's why the stem rules those out.
Source: EAE/ASE valve stenosis recommendations (2009), Pressure Half-Time, pp. 12–13, and Associated Lesions, p. 15.
Measurement Techniques, Maneuvers, and Sonographic Views — mitral valve (4.A.2)
Question 15 · AE-15
From the apex, a CW Doppler signal through the LVOT is late-peaking and concave upward in early systole, giving it a dagger shape. What is the most likely cause?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D
Dynamic obstruction builds as the ventricle empties, so the velocity peaks late. Fixed obstruction usually has a more rounded contour; severe fixed AS can also peak late.
- A and B are both fixed obstructions. The concave-upward, dagger-shaped contour favors dynamic obstruction; timing alone is not enough.
- C: a holosystolic MR signal is longer than the outflow signal. It starts at mitral closure and lasts until mitral opening.
Dynamic obstruction also changes with loading: it gets worse when the ventricle is smaller or contracting harder. That's why provocative maneuvers matter in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
Source: EACVI/ASE aortic stenosis update (2017), Etiologies and Peak Jet Velocity (Figure 3), pp. 374–378, and Mitral Regurgitation, p. 389.
Pathology — cardiomyopathies (2.A.8)
Question 16 · AE-16
Which statement about reactions to ultrasound enhancing agents (UEAs) is consistent with ASE's 2018 guideline?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A
Life-threatening reactions are very rare, about 1 in 10,000, and most reactions occur right away or within the first 30 minutes. Labs using UEAs should have a response policy and an allergy kit; auto-injectable epinephrine is its most important component.
- B and C misstate the timing and frequency.
- D is outdated. Pulmonary hypertension alone is not a blanket contraindication. Current labels still require product-specific precautions, including assessment for embolic phenomena in patients with cardiac shunts.
Labeled contraindications are product-specific hypersensitivities: Definity includes perflutren lipid microspheres or components such as polyethylene glycol (PEG); Optison includes perflutren or albumin. Check the actual label, have trained resuscitation personnel and equipment available, and monitor for acute reactions.
Source: ASE UEA guideline update (2018), Section V, p. 263, and Table 3; Definity prescribing information (revised March 2024) and Optison prescribing information (revised May 2025), Sections 4–5.
Clinical Care and Safety — medical emergencies (3.B.2)
Question 17 · AE-17
In a normal apical 4-chamber view, the right ventricle should appear:
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C
The normal RV is smaller than the LV and doesn't reach the apex. When the RV forms the apex or matches the LV, think dilation.
- A and B describe RV enlargement.
- D is wrong: the 2025 ASE guideline's normal RV basal diameter is under 4.1 cm, and over 4.9 cm is severely dilated.
Measure RV size from an RV-focused apical view, not the standard 4-chamber, for reproducible numbers.
Source: ASE right heart guideline (2025), Right Ventricle section and Table 1, pp. 144–145.
Anatomy and Physiology — normal anatomy (1.A.2)
Question 18 · AE-18
A patient in sinus rhythm has distinct E and A waves and no significant mitral valve disease. Mitral inflow E/A is 1.3 at rest. During an adequate Valsalva strain phase, E/A falls to 0.6. What does this suggest?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A
[(1.3 − 0.6) ÷ 1.3] × 100 ≈ 54%. A fall in E/A of 50% or more with Valsalva is highly specific for increased LV filling pressure. Valsalva lowers preload and unmasks impaired relaxation hiding behind a "normal-looking" E/A.
- B: this degree of reduction argues against normal filling in this context.
- C is backwards. A drop in E is expected; an adequate Valsalva is defined as reducing peak E by more than 10%.
- D: an irreversible restrictive pattern wouldn't change this much.
Record mitral inflow continuously for about 10 seconds during the strain phase.
Source: ASE diastolic function update (2025), Tables 3–4 and Section 5, pp. 540–552.
Measurement Techniques, Maneuvers, and Sonographic Views — maneuvers (4.A.12)
Question 19 · AE-19
A patient has increased LV wall thickness, biatrial enlargement, and preserved EF. The longitudinal strain bull's-eye shows reduced basal and mid strain with relatively preserved apical strain. This pattern most suggests:
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B
Apical sparing on the strain polar map is the distinctive phenotype described for cardiac amyloidosis. Other red flags in the stem: thick walls, biatrial enlargement, preserved EF. This pattern supports suspicion; it is not diagnostic by itself.
- A: apical HCM is defined by apical hypertrophy (a spade-shaped cavity), not preserved apical strain with abnormal basal strain.
- C: a left anterior descending (LAD) coronary-territory infarct would be expected to produce a territorial pattern rather than the described circumferential basal and mid reduction.
- D: athletic remodeling can enlarge the atria, but it does not characteristically explain this combined wall-thickness and strain pattern.
Source: ASE diastolic function update (2025), Restrictive Cardiomyopathy, p. 561, and LA-size context, p. 552; ASE UEA guideline (2018), apical HCM description.
Pathology — strain (2.A.10)
Question 20 · AE-20
In a patient with acute severe aortic regurgitation, M-mode and Doppler show premature closure of the mitral valve and diastolic mitral regurgitation. These findings indicate:
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D
In acute severe AR, LV diastolic pressure can rise rapidly before the ventricle has time to adapt. When LV diastolic pressure rises above LA pressure before atrial contraction, the mitral valve closes early. Diastolic MR has the same cause. Both findings indicate elevated LV filling pressure from a hemodynamically significant lesion.
- A: these findings indicate elevated LV diastolic pressure; they do not establish low LA pressure.
- B doesn't cause premature closure.
- C isn't how this pattern arises in acute severe AR.
Source: ASE diastolic function update (2025), Aortic Stenosis and Aortic Regurgitation section, p. 558.
Pathology — aortic valve (2.A.12)
Turn your misses into a study list
Group your misses by domain and start with the concepts you cannot explain. Domains have unequal, small samples here, so a two-miss cutoff would be misleading. Treat your result as a pointer, not a measurement of readiness.
For every miss, write one line in an error log. Name why you missed it, because the fix depends on the cause.
| Question | Why I missed it | What corrects it | My corrected explanation | Revisit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AE-14 | Formula: used the wrong constant | EAE/ASE 2009, pressure half-time | MVA = 220 ÷ PHT, so 220 ÷ 275 = 0.80 cm². Not valid with severe AR or right after commissurotomy. | In 3 days, then week 8 |
| Entry 2 | Concept · View/acquisition · Formula/units · Guideline edition · Misread the stem |
Then redo the questions you missed a week later, without looking at the explanations first. A question you remember the answer to isn't new proof you're ready, so explain every option out loud, including the wrong ones.
What to prioritize: the current AE content outline
| Domain | Official weight | Master these first |
|---|---|---|
| Pathology | 46% | Valve disease (AS, MR, AR, MS, TR), diastolic dysfunction grading, cardiomyopathies, wall motion and coronary territories, pericardial disease, RV/pulmonary hypertension, septal defects, prosthetic valves and devices |
| Anatomy and Physiology | 25% | Cardiac cycle timing, normal variants (Chiari network, eustachian valve, false tendon), wall segments, normal valve function, normal stress response, normal strain patterns |
| Measurement Techniques, Maneuvers, and Sonographic Views | 14% | Continuity equation, Bernoulli/RVSP, pressure half-time, Qp/Qs, LV/LA/RV measurements, Valsalva and other maneuvers, every TTE window, TEE valve views |
| Clinical Care and Safety | 9% | Contraindications (TEE, contrast), critical findings, emergencies, patient prep and monitoring, infection control |
| Instrumentation, Optimization, and Contrast | 6% | Artifacts, Doppler and color settings, harmonics, non-imaging (pedof) probe, agitated saline and ultrasound enhancing agents, TEE critical findings |
These are the weights in the current linked AE Content Outline, version 24.2.1, pages 1–4, checked October 29, 2026. They are not exact question counts for an individual exam form or a formula for how long you must study. Your own weak spots should still decide how you split your study time.
Check all five weights in your materials against the official outline. A matching Pathology percentage alone does not establish that a resource uses the same version. The 20 questions here are an editorial selection across all five domains, not a proportionally weighted mock exam or complete coverage of every outline task.
The AE formula sheet (with worked examples)
You'll calculate on the exam. Learn these until you can run them without thinking, and learn what makes each one wrong.
| What you're solving | Formula | Worked example | Watch for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peak instantaneous pressure gradient | ΔP = 4V² (V in m/s; negligible proximal velocity) | V = 4.0 m/s → 64 mmHg | Squaring the error: a jet measured off-angle at 3.6 m/s instead of 4.0 m/s reads 52 mmHg, not 64 |
| RVSP | 4(TR V)² + RAP | TR 3.0 m/s, RAP 3 → 39 mmHg | Forgetting RAP; overgaining the TR envelope |
| RAP from the IVC (spontaneously breathing adults) | ≤2.1 cm + collapses ≥50% → 3 mmHg; >2.1 cm + collapses <50% → 15 mmHg; mixed findings → 8 mmHg | IVC 2.4 cm, 30% collapse → 15 mmHg | Using IVC collapse in a ventilated patient |
| Stroke volume | 0.785 × D² × VTI (D and VTI in cm; result in mL; circular cross-section) | D 2.0 cm, VTI 20 cm → 63 mL | Measuring LVOT D and VTI at different levels |
| Continuity AVA | (LVOT area × LVOT VTI) ÷ AV VTI | 3.14 × 20 ÷ 100 → 0.63 cm² | LVOT diameter error, squared |
| Dimensionless index | LVOT VTI ÷ AV VTI (or velocity ratio) | 20 ÷ 100 → 0.20 | Treating it as an area |
| Mitral valve area | 220 ÷ pressure half-time | PHT 275 ms → 0.80 cm² | Using it after balloon commissurotomy, with severe AR, or in calcific MS |
| Qp/Qs | RVOT SV ÷ LVOT SV | 88 ÷ 63 → 1.4 | Inverting the ratio; significant aortic or pulmonic regurgitation limits the method |
| PISA EROA | (2πr² × Va) ÷ peak MR V; r in cm, velocities in cm/s | r 1.0 cm, Va 40 cm/s, V 500 cm/s → 0.50 cm² | Using πr²; mixing cm and m; requires an unconstrained hemisphere and matched timing |
| Regurgitant volume (PISA) | EROA × regurgitant jet VTI | 0.50 cm² × 150 cm → 75 mL | Treating peak EROA as constant throughout a changing or late-systolic jet |
| LV ejection fraction (%) | [(EDV − ESV) ÷ EDV] × 100 | 120 and 50 mL → 58% | Foreshortened apex; consider UEA when 2+ segments can't be seen, subject to the product label |
Sources: EACVI/ASE aortic stenosis update (2017) (gradient, continuity, dimensionless index); ASE right heart guideline (2025) (RVSP, RAP); ASE native valvular regurgitation guideline (2017) (stroke volume, PISA); EAE/ASE valve stenosis recommendations (2009) (pressure half-time); ASE/SCAI ASD and PFO guideline (2015) (Qp/Qs); ASE UEA guideline (2018) (UEA use); ASE/EACVI chamber quantification (2015), Section 2.2, p. 7 (EF). EDV and ESV are end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes. Intermediate RAP estimates can be refined with secondary findings; a single IVC measurement is not a complete hemodynamic assessment.
Severity cutoffs worth memorizing
Use these within the cited guideline’s integrated assessment. A single valve threshold does not settle discordant measurements, flow conditions, or regurgitation timing.
| Lesion or measure | Cutoff | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Severe aortic stenosis | Peak velocity ≥4.0 m/s, mean gradient ≥40 mmHg, AVA <1.0 cm², velocity ratio <0.25 | EACVI/ASE 2017, Table 3 |
| Severe primary MR | EROA ≥0.40 cm²; vena contracta ≥0.7 cm | ASE 2017 regurgitation guideline |
| Pulmonary hypertension suspected | Resting peak TR velocity ≥2.9 m/s, or ≥2.8 m/s with at least 2 adjunctive signs, suggests PH; RVSP ≥35 mmHg is abnormal. Exclude RVOT/pulmonic obstruction and interpret with clinical findings. | ASE right heart 2025 |
| 2025 diastolic algorithm inputs | Impaired relaxation: septal e′ ≤6 or lateral e′ ≤7 cm/s. Pressure-related inputs: average E/e′ ≥14 and PA systolic pressure ≥35 mmHg when RAP is available, or TR velocity ≥2.8 m/s when it is not. LA reservoir strain ≤18% is a supplemental measure. Apply Figure 3 only to its eligible population, as in AE-06. | ASE diastolic 2025 |
| RV size and function (2025) | RV basal diameter normal <4.1 cm; TAPSE normal >1.7 cm; RV S′ normal >9.5 cm/s; FAC normal >35% | ASE right heart 2025, Table 1 |
| UEA indication (resting echo) | 2 or more LV segments not adequately seen; check contraindications and precautions for the agent | ASE UEA 2018 |
The RV values are adult reference measurements, not interchangeable proofs of normal global RV function. Use the specified views and consider body size, loading, and clinical context. TAPSE is tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; S′ is annular systolic tissue velocity; FAC is fractional area change.
Check which guideline edition your book uses. ASE has replaced three guidelines you'll study for AE:
- Prosthetic valves: the 2024 guideline replaced the 2009 one (ASE guideline page).
- Right heart: the March 2025 guideline replaced the 2010 one.
- Diastolic function: the July 2025 update replaced the 2016 one.
Check each resource’s stated guideline edition, especially when it predates these updates. ARDMS's content outline lists tasks, not guideline editions. So learn the physiology behind each cutoff as well as the number. These are clinical-guideline publication dates; the public AE outline does not specify when ARDMS adopts individual guideline changes.
Your 8-week AE study plan
Assumes: 6–8 hours a week, you've completed cardiac clinical training or work in an echo lab, and you test at the end of week 8. That is 48–64 hours in total. The weeks cover all five domains, with additional review driven by your error log. This is our editorial plan, not an official requirement, and finishing it doesn't guarantee a pass.
| Week | Focus | Do this |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baseline + anatomy & physiology | Take the 20 questions above cold and start your error log. Review the cardiac cycle (pressure curves, valve timing, IVRT/IVCT), 17-segment nomenclature and coronary territories, and normal variants. |
| 2 | Hemodynamics math | Work every formula on the sheet until it's automatic. Make up your own numbers and solve 5 problems a day. |
| 3 | Aortic and mitral valve disease | AS grading (including low-flow, low-gradient), AR, MS, MR (primary vs secondary, PISA, vena contracta). |
| 4 | Right heart, tricuspid, pulmonic, PH | 2025 right heart guideline: RAP, RVSP, RV size and function, septal configuration, PE findings. |
| 5 | Diastolic function and cardiomyopathies | 2025 diastolic algorithm: work AE-06 through Figure 3, explain each branch you use, and compare AE-08 and AE-19. Review HCM, dilated and restrictive cardiomyopathy, amyloid, and constriction vs restriction. |
| 6 | Ischemia, stress, masses, endocarditis, aorta | Wall motion by territory, MI complications, normal and abnormal stress response, thrombus vs tumor vs vegetation, dissection and aneurysm. |
| 7 | Congenital, postoperative, devices, TEE, contrast, safety | ASD/PFO/VSD, tetralogy, coarctation, prosthetic valves (2024 guideline), closure devices, LVADs, TEE views and contraindications, saline and UEA, critical findings. |
| 8 | Timed review + weak spots | Redo the 20 questions without viewing the answers, record your time, and explain each choice. This is text practice, not a simulation of the image-based exam. Re-study the concepts you still cannot explain from your error log. Open the Inteleos tutorial from Pearson VUE's ARDMS page so the test interface isn't new on test day. |
Adapt it.
- 4 weeks out? Combine weeks 1–2, 3–4, 5–6, and 7–8, and double your weekly hours to 12–16. Don't drop the formula practice or the diastolic algorithm.
- Working sonographer? Pull cases from your own lab for each week's topic, following your lab's privacy rules. Measuring real images beats rereading.
- Still a student? Add 2–3 weeks and spend more time on views and normal anatomy before pathology.
- Retaking? Start from your score report's weak areas and your error log. You must wait 60 days between attempts.
How AE questions work
Expect images. Inteleos describes AE as multiple choice plus hotspot items, where you mark your answer directly on an image. Practice naming structures and abnormalities on real clips, not just reading descriptions. Inteleos links a short video on how to answer a hotspot question, and Pearson VUE's ARDMS page links the Inteleos (ARDMS/APCA) tutorial.
Read an image in the same order every time. This is our study routine, not an official method:
- Name the window and view.
- Confirm orientation: what's anterior, what's at the apex, which side is which.
- Name the structure or Doppler signal you're looking at.
- Check technical quality. Is the view foreshortened? Is the Doppler beam aligned with flow? Are gain and the color scale set correctly?
- Say what this image supports, and what else you'd need before calling severity.
Think in steps. Many questions give you a cluster of findings and ask for the diagnosis, the next measurement, or the error. The practice questions above work the same way: spot what's abnormal, connect it to physiology, then pick.
Pace yourself. 180 minutes for about 150 questions is a little over a minute each. Calculations take longer, so move quickly on recognition items.
AE exam format and official next steps
| Exam detail | Information |
|---|---|
| What it earns | For the initial adult-echo pathway to RDCS (Registered Diagnostic Cardiac Sonographer), pass AE and Sonography Principles and Instrumentation (SPI) and meet the applicable education, clinical-experience, and documentation requirements. |
| SPI timing | Pass both within five years of each other, in either order. The window runs by calendar year: in Inteleos's example, if you pass your first exam on June 6, 2026, you have until December 31, 2031 to pass the second. The rule doesn't apply when you add a specialty to a certification you already hold. |
| Format | About 150 multiple-choice questions, including hotspot items. Inteleos also lists a five-minute survey. |
| Time | 3 hours |
| Scoring | Scaled 300–700; 555 or higher passes. Not a percentage and not curved. See how ARDMS results are reported. |
| Fee | $300 USD for AE, per the official fee schedule |
| Testing | Pearson VUE |
| If you don't pass | Reapply after 3 days, then wait 60 days from your last attempt to retest. The 60-day wait can't be waived. See our ARDMS retake policy guide. |
| Blueprint | Content Outline version 24.2.1, linked from the official exam page |
Last verified October 29, 2026, against the official Inteleos/ARDMS AE exam page, 5-year rule, re-applicant resources, RDCS requirements, and exam fee schedule. Fees and policies can change, so confirm before you apply.
Official next steps:
- Check your eligibility. Use the official ARDMS prerequisite tool and charts. Eligibility depends on your education and clinical-experience pathway.
- Apply. Our ARDMS exam registration guide walks through the steps. If you need testing accommodations, request them during the application.
- Schedule. After approval, schedule through Pearson VUE's ARDMS page.
- Plan SPI. If you haven't passed SPI yet, see our ARDMS SPI exam prep guide and free SPI practice test.
AE exam questions people ask
How hard is the AE exam?
The latest posted global AE pass rates are for January 1–December 31, 2025: 74% for first-time takers, 37% for repeat takers, and 65% overall. These are group results, not your probability of passing. The summary does not publish candidate counts. Source: official 2025 Global Exam Performance Summary, AE row.
For historical context, the AE exam page, Statistics, still lists 2023 at 78% first-time and 71% overall; first-time pass rates in its posted years from 2013 through 2023 ranged from 67% to 81%.
Is AE the same as the CCI RCS exam?
No. AE is ARDMS's adult echo specialty exam and leads to RDCS. The Registered Cardiac Sonographer (RCS) credential from Cardiovascular Credentialing International (CCI) is a separate credential with its own exam, outline, and rules. Much of the clinical content overlaps, but don't use one exam's blueprint or policies for the other.
Should I use "exam dumps"?
No. The official ARDMS exam security policy prohibits acquiring or using unauthorized exam materials, including recalled questions, and participating in review courses that claim to provide live exam questions. Original practice built from the outline and current guidelines is the honest route.
How long should I study?
Our editorial starting point for a working sonographer is the 8-week, 6–8-hours-per-week plan above. Add time when your error log shows gaps in views, anatomy, or clinical foundations. Let the concepts you need to learn decide, not the calendar.
Sources
Official exam information (checked October 29, 2026):
- Inteleos, Adult Echocardiography (AE) exam page: format, time, scoring, and historical pass rates
- Inteleos/ARDMS, AE Examination Content Outline, version 24.2.1: current linked domains, weights, and tasks
- Inteleos, 2025 Global Exam Performance Summary: global AE first-time, repeat, and overall results for 2025
- Inteleos, RDCS requirements, exam fee schedule, 5-Year Rule, Re-applicant Resources, Prerequisites, Accommodations, and Exam Security
- Pearson VUE, ARDMS testing page
- Cardiovascular Credentialing International, Registered Cardiac Sonographer
Clinical guidelines used for the practice questions and formula sheet:
-
Mukherjee M, et al. Guidelines for the Echocardiographic Assessment of the Right Heart in Adults and Special Considerations in Pulmonary Hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2025;38:141–86.
-
Nagueh SF, et al. Recommendations for the Evaluation of LV Diastolic Function by Echocardiography and for HFpEF Diagnosis: An Update From the ASE. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2025;38:537–69.
-
Baumgartner H, et al. Recommendations on the Echocardiographic Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Focused Update. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:372–92.
-
Baumgartner H, et al. Echocardiographic Assessment of Valve Stenosis: EAE/ASE Recommendations. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:1–23.
-
Zoghbi WA, et al. Recommendations for Noninvasive Evaluation of Native Valvular Regurgitation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:303–71.
-
Silvestry FE, et al. Guidelines for the Echocardiographic Assessment of Atrial Septal Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:910–58.
-
Hahn RT, et al. Guidelines for Performing a Comprehensive Transesophageal Echocardiographic Examination. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26:921–64.
-
Porter TR, et al. Clinical Applications of Ultrasonic Enhancing Agents in Echocardiography: 2018 ASE Guidelines Update. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31:241–74.
-
American Society of Echocardiography, Evaluation of Prosthetic Valve Function guideline page (2024; replaces 2009)
-
American Society of Echocardiography, Guidelines for the Use of Echocardiography in the Evaluation of a Cardiac Source of Embolism (2016), p. 31: bubble-study timing limits
-
ASE/EACVI, Recommendations for Cardiac Chamber Quantification in Adults (2015), Section 2.2, p. 7: EF formula
-
Current label text checked for Definity (revised March 2024) and Optison (revised May 2025), Sections 4–5: contraindications and precautions
Last verified: October 29, 2026 (official exam facts, linked outline, 2025 pass-rate report, and the cited UEA label text). We checked each practice item against the guideline section cited in its explanation. That is a source check, not a clinical review. By Castleport Test Prep Editorial Team.
Independence and trademarks: Castleport Test Prep is an independent exam prep publisher. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by ARDMS or Inteleos. ARDMS, RDCS, and other exam and credential names identify their subjects; trademarks belong to their respective owners. Practice questions on this page are original and are not actual exam questions. This page is for exam preparation and is not clinical guidance for patient care.