Castleport Test Prep

NCIDQ IDIX Exam Prep: Free Study Guide and 20 Practice Questions

The IDIX (Interior Design Implementation Exam) replaced PRAC in 2026. Start this NCIDQ IDIX exam prep guide with the priority map, then work the 20 original practice questions below it.

What IDIX covers: your priority map

The weights are CIDQ's, from the official IDIX blueprint. The right-hand column is our plain-English version of what each domain asks you to do.

What IDIX covers: your priority map
DomainWeightWhat you need to be able to do
III. Construction Documents32%Read and complete a drawing set: construction plans, demolition plans, reflected ceiling plans (RCPs), elevations, sections and details. Know wall types, mounting heights, ceiling heights and lighting layouts.
II. Integration and FF&E19%Fit building systems, finishes and furniture (furniture, fixtures and equipment, or FF&E) into the design. Handle transitions, clearances, takeoffs and installation requirements.
IV. Consultant Drawing Coordination18%Catch conflicts between your drawings and the consultants' drawings. Know which discipline owns what. Develop power/data, signage and wayfinding plans.
I. Codes and Life Safety16%Run a code review: occupant load, egress, travel distance, fire ratings, plumbing fixture counts, accessibility and code-required signage.
V. Construction Specifications and Schedules15%Write and read specifications: types, divisions and the three-part format. Build door, hardware, finish, furniture and plumbing schedules.

The blueprint's topic bullets show what can be tested. Counting them doesn't tell you how many questions each topic gets.

IDIX practice questions

These 20 questions are original and unofficial. We wrote them for the 2026 IDIX blueprint, and they are not CIDQ questions. They sample all five domains in rough proportion to the weights. They are not a full-length exam, and your score on them is not a scaled score or a pass prediction.

They practice skills used in all four official item formats, not the exam interface itself. Matching questions stand in for drag-and-place, and labeled regions stand in for hot spots. Two vignettes group four related questions each, much like the scenario sets CIDQ describes. The code calculations supply the rules and inputs you need; the real exam provides a code-reference document. See the CIDQ handbook, p. 19 and code index, p. 1.

Vignette A: Media room 204 document check (Questions 1–4)

You're reviewing documents for media room 204 before they're issued for construction.

Question 1 · Consultant Drawing Coordination · Multiple choice

The approved display-mounting layout has not changed.

Question 1 · Consultant Drawing Coordination · Multiple choice
DocumentAV connection-plate location
Approved mounting layoutZone B
Current audiovisual consultant drawingZone C

Which coordination note identifies the issue without inventing a new design decision?

  • A. Keep Zone C because consultant drawings automatically take precedence.
  • B. Flag the Zone C plate and coordinate its location with the approved Zone B mounting layout.
  • C. Move the approved display layout to Zone C without resolving the mismatch.
Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Why: The two documents disagree, and the approved layout hasn't changed. The note's job is to name the mismatch and get it coordinated.

  • A invents a precedence rule. Consultant drawings don't automatically win.
  • C quietly changes an approved design decision instead of resolving the conflict.

Once the discrepancy is resolved, the fix goes into every affected document. This kind of cross-discipline check is ordinary documentation practice; see, for example, Colorado State University's drawing requirements, §309.13.

Question 2 · Construction Documents · Fill in the blank

The plan for room 204 shows a circular wheelchair turning space 60 inches in diameter. Room 204 is in a new building. For this check, use ICC A117.1-2017: a circular turning space must be at least 67 inches in diameter in new buildings and at least 60 inches in existing buildings.

What minimum diameter, in inches, should the drawn circle show?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: 67 inches

Why: The building is new, so the new-building value applies. 60 inches is the existing-building value. A117.1-2017 also raised the clear floor space for new buildings to 30 by 52 inches, up from 30 by 48 inches for existing buildings. On IDIX, check whether a project is new or existing before you apply these dimensions. Source: ICC, 2017 A117.1 significant changes, slides 12–13.

Question 3 · Integration and FF&E · Matching (drag-and-place)

The furniture package uses these fictional service kits. Each table must get a kit with exactly the power and data connections listed, with no extras.

Question 3 · Integration and FF&E · Matching (drag-and-place)
KitPower connectionsData connections
K122
K242
K320

Match each table to a kit:

  • T1 needs 4 power, 2 data.
  • T2 needs 2 power, 2 data.
  • T3 needs 2 power, 0 data.
Show answer and explanation

Answer: T1 → K2; T2 → K1; T3 → K3

Why: Match both columns, not just power. K1 and K3 have the same power count but different data, so matching on power alone gets T2 or T3 wrong. These are furniture-selection inputs only.

Question 4 · Construction Specifications and Schedules · Multiple choice

The equipment plan shows tags E201, E202 and E204. The equipment schedule lists only E201 and E202. The approved equipment list includes E204, and the project requires every plan tag to have a schedule entry. What's the gap?

  • A. The E204 schedule entry is missing and must be completed from the approved equipment information.
  • B. E204 should be deleted from the plan because the schedule has fewer entries.
  • C. E204 can use the E202 entry because both tags begin with E.
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

Why: The project rule requires an E204 entry, and the item is approved scope.

  • B deletes approved scope to make the documents agree.
  • C treats unrelated tags as interchangeable.

Fill the entry from the actual approved data, not guessed sizes or performance.

Vignette B: Office suite review (Questions 5–8)

A tenant fit-out for a business-use office suite. Each question gives you the facts it needs.

Question 5 · Codes and Life Safety · Fill in the blank

The suite's approved occupant load is 90. One multiple-user toilet facility is designed to serve all genders and all 90 occupants. No urinals are substituted.

Use these 2021 IPC rules:

  • Base the count on the total occupant load for this arrangement.
  • Provide 1 water closet per 25 occupants for the first 50, then 1 per 50 above 50.
  • Round a fractional count up.

How many water closets are required?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: 3

Why: 50 ÷ 25 = 2, plus (90 − 50) ÷ 50 = 0.8, which totals 2.8 and rounds up to 3. The base rule splits the occupant load in half by sex, but the 2021 IPC's exception for all-gender multiple-user facilities uses 100% of the total occupant load. So don't halve it here. This is a fixture count only. It is not a full toilet-room layout or accessibility review. Source: ICC, 2021 IPC §403.1.1 and Exception 2, with business-use example.

Question 6 · Construction Documents · Hot spot (select a labeled region)

Compare these elevation callouts with the unchanged approved project dimensions. All values are inches above the same finished-floor datum. Select the one inconsistent callout.

Question 6 · Construction Documents · Hot spot (select a labeled region)
RegionElementApproved dimensionElevation callout
ACeiling underside108108
BFinished countertop3028
CTop of wall base44
DTop of upper cabinet9090

These are project dimensions for the exercise, not code minimums or maximums.

Show answer and explanation

Answer: Region B

Why: Only B disagrees with its approved value: 28 instead of 30. The comparison works because every number is measured from the same datum. Finding the mismatch doesn't prove the approved design meets every code. It only proves the drawings disagree.

Question 7 · Consultant Drawing Coordination · Multiple choice

Approved RCP revision D increases luminaire L2 from eight to ten units. The electrical consultant's lighting schedule still shows eight. The project assigns lighting circuits and controls to that consultant. Which review comment is supported?

  • A. The extra fixtures need no coordination because the fixture type is unchanged.
  • B. The interior designer should assign new branch circuits independently.
  • C. Ask the electrical consultant to reconcile the ten-fixture layout with the lighting schedule and the affected circuit and control design.
  • D. Return the ceiling plan to eight fixtures without discussing the approved revision.
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C

Why: C names the change and sends it to the discipline that owns the affected work.

  • A ignores the quantity change.
  • B oversteps the designer's assigned role.
  • D reverses an approved revision instead of resolving it.

Question 8 · Integration and FF&E · Multiple choice

A preliminary flooring screen requires three things:

  • A documented relative-humidity limit at least as high as the measured 82%.
  • Stated compatibility with specified adhesive Y.
  • A supplied test report.

The data are fictional. Judge only these three criteria.

Question 8 · Integration and FF&E · Multiple choice
OptionMaximum relative humidityAdhesive compatibilityTest report
F180%YSupplied
F290%Z onlySupplied
F385%YSupplied
F485%YNot supplied

Which option passes?

  • A. F1
  • B. F2
  • C. F3
  • D. F4
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C (F3)

Why: F3 meets all three criteria.

  • F1's limit is below the measured 82%.
  • F2 isn't compatible with adhesive Y, even though it has the highest moisture limit.
  • F4 has no test report.

A bigger number on one criterion doesn't win if another criterion fails. The 82% and the limits are exercise inputs, not industry thresholds. Checking installation conditions against manufacturer data is standard specification practice; see UFS 1-300-02, Appendix A, Part 3.

Standalone questions (9–20)

Question 9 · Codes and Life Safety · Fill in the blank

Two assembly rooms feed one corridor segment, and every occupant of both rooms passes through it. No other spaces feed the segment, and no increased or reduced occupant load applies.

  • Room A is 630 net square feet with movable chairs only.
  • Room B is 600 net square feet with tables and chairs.

Use the 2021 IBC Table 1004.5 factors: 7 net square feet per person for chairs only, and 15 net square feet per person for tables and chairs.

What cumulative occupant load does the corridor segment serve?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: 130

Why: Room A gives 630 ÷ 7 = 90, and Room B gives 600 ÷ 15 = 40, for a total of 130. Calculate each function with its own factor, then add the loads where the paths combine. Using one factor for both rooms, or keeping only the larger room's load, is wrong. The 130 feeds later checks like width and number of exits; it doesn't answer them. Source: ICC, 2021 IBC Means of Egress (Table 1004.5; §§1004.2.1, 1004.3; slides 19, 23, 26).

Question 10 · Codes and Life Safety · Hot spot (select a labeled node)

A is the most remote occupied point on a floor. The path connections are:

  • A to B: 24 feet. This is the only route out of A.
  • B to C: 18 feet. This is the only route out of B.
  • C to exit access doorway D: 55 feet.
  • C to exit access doorway E: 67 feet.

C is the first point where occupants have separate and distinct routes to two exit access doorways. At which node does the common path of egress travel end?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: Node C

Why: The 2021 IBC defines the common path as the part of travel before occupants have separate and distinct access to two exits or exit access doorways. That choice first appears at C. So the common path is A–B–C, which is 42 feet.

  • A starts the common path; it is not the first point with a choice of routes.
  • B is just a point along a single route.
  • D and E are past the point of choice.

No limit is given, so this question doesn't ask whether 42 feet complies. Source: ICC, 2021 IBC Means of Egress (§§202, 1006.2; slides 44–45).

Question 11 · Construction Documents · Matching (drag-and-place)

This project's legend says a reference written "detail number / sheet number" points to one detail on one sheet.

Question 11 · Construction Documents · Matching (drag-and-place)
ReferenceDetail title
3 / A502Wall-base termination
1 / A503Cabinet head
2 / A501Partition return

Match each request to its reference:

  • R1, cabinet head
  • R2, partition return
  • R3, wall-base termination
Show answer and explanation

Answer: R1 → 1 / A503; R2 → 2 / A501; R3 → 3 / A502

Why: Each match needs both the right detail number and the right sheet. Landing on the correct sheet but the wrong detail is still a missed reference. The convention comes from this project's legend; other projects may use other symbols, so always read the legend first.

Question 12 · Construction Documents · Fill in the blank

A simplified partition detail shows a 3⅝-inch stud with one layer of ⅝-inch board on each face. For this arithmetic, those are the only layers that add thickness.

What's the total thickness in inches?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: 4⅞ inches (4.875)

Why: 3⅝ + ⅝ + ⅝ = 4⅞. Counting only one board face gives 4¼ and drops a layer. Insulation inside the stud cavity wouldn't add thickness here. This is a dimension check only. It says nothing about a fire or sound rating.

Question 13 · Construction Documents · Multiple choice

A proposal would add plywood to a gypsum-board wall documented as a UL fire-resistance-rated assembly. Nobody has checked the assembly's listing or its permitted variations. Which statement is defensible right now?

  • A. Adding material always preserves the documented fire-resistance rating.
  • B. Plywood can never be included in a UL fire-resistance-rated gypsum-board wall assembly.
  • C. Verify the applicable assembly and its permitted-variation conditions before claiming the revised wall keeps its rating.
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C

Why: UL's guide information for rated assemblies (product category BXUV) does allow wood structural panels in rated gypsum-board walls, but only under conditions. Those conditions cover the panel type and thickness, where joints fall relative to studs and gypsum joints, and fastener length.

  • A is wrong: added layers aren't automatically safe.
  • B is wrong: they aren't automatically banned either.

The proposal needs evidence that the conditions are met. Source: UL Solutions, Plywood Panels in UL Fire-Resistant Wall Assemblies.

Question 14 · Construction Documents · Hot spot (select a labeled region)

The approved demolition scope says to keep columns C1 and C2, remove partition W1 and keep partition W2. The legend says diagonal hatching means "remove."

Question 14 · Construction Documents · Hot spot (select a labeled region)
RegionElementPlan marking
AColumn C1Shown to remain
BPartition W1Hatched for removal
CPartition W2Shown to remain
DColumn C2Hatched for removal

Select the region that contradicts the approved scope.

Show answer and explanation

Answer: Region D

Why: C2 is hatched for removal, but the scope says to keep it. A, B and C all match. The question asks you to find a drawing contradiction, not to judge structural safety. Removing a column is never something a demolition plan should do by accident. For an example of documenting demolition extent, see CSU drawing requirements, §309.12.

Question 15 · Integration and FF&E · Multiple choice

A meeting room's problem is too much reverberation inside the room. The team is comparing how well different ceiling finishes absorb sound. Which rating most directly fits that comparison?

  • A. Sound transmission class (STC) of a wall assembly
  • B. Noise reduction coefficient (NRC) of the ceiling finish
  • C. Impact insulation class (IIC) of a floor-ceiling assembly
Show answer and explanation

Answer: B

Why: NRC describes how much sound a material absorbs, which is the reverberation problem.

  • STC rates airborne sound passing through an assembly.
  • IIC rates impact sound, like footsteps, passing through a floor-ceiling assembly.

A good NRC doesn't by itself guarantee the room's final acoustics. Source: USG, Acoustics 101.

Question 16 · Integration and FF&E · Fill in the blank

A fictional wallcovering order covers one uninterrupted wall 25 feet wide.

  • Each full-height drop covers 2 feet of width.
  • Each drop is cut 10 feet long, which already includes pattern match and trim.
  • Each roll gives 30 usable feet.
  • No horizontal seams are allowed, and short offcuts can't be joined into a drop.
  • You must buy whole rolls.

What's the minimum number of rolls?

Show answer and explanation

Answer: 5

Why: Work in two steps:

  1. Drops needed: 25 ÷ 2 = 12.5, which rounds up to 13 drops.
  2. Rolls needed: each roll gives 30 ÷ 10 = 3 full drops, so 13 ÷ 3 ≈ 4.33, which rounds up to 5 rolls.

Four rolls give only 12 drops. Don't add an extra waste percentage, because pattern and trim are already in the cut length. An area-only estimate misses the whole-drop rule.

Question 17 · Consultant Drawing Coordination · Matching (drag-and-place)

On this project:

  • The mechanical consultant leads ductwork and its service access.
  • The audiovisual consultant leads display connections.
  • The electrical consultant leads lighting circuits and controls.
  • The interior designer coordinates all three with the interior documents.

Match each issue to its lead:

  1. A duct service-access location is blocked by a fixed ceiling feature.
  2. A display connection plate no longer lines up with the equipment layout.
  3. A lighting-control group no longer matches the revised room partitioning.

Leads to choose from: mechanical, audiovisual, electrical.

Show answer and explanation

Answer: 1 → Mechanical; 2 → Audiovisual; 3 → Electrical

Why: The routing follows this project's stated responsibilities. The designer still coordinates, but doesn't redesign another discipline's system alone. Responsibilities can differ by contract, so read them from the project, not from habit.

Question 18 · Construction Specifications and Schedules · Matching (drag-and-place)

Use the three-part specification format: Part 1 General, Part 2 Products, Part 3 Execution. Place each requirement:

  1. Submit the manufacturer's installation instructions for review.
  2. Provide the specified aluminum component with the stated finish.
  3. Prepare the substrate before installing the component.
  4. Inspect the completed installation as part of field quality control.
Show answer and explanation

Answer: 1 → General; 2 → Products; 3 → Execution; 4 → Execution

Why: Submittals belong in General. The component and its finish are Products. Preparing substrates and inspecting installed work are Execution. The common slip is item 1: submitting instructions is an administrative requirement, even though the instructions describe installation. Sources: CSI SectionFormat; UFS 1-300-02, Appendix A.

Question 19 · Construction Specifications and Schedules · Multiple choice

In a pre-issue review, a drawing and a specification call for different materials. The project uses AIA A201-2017 §1.2.1 without changes, and no separate order-of-precedence clause exists. Which review note holds up?

  • A. Resolve the conflict before issue. The stated AIA provision treats the documents as complementary, not as a ranked hierarchy.
  • B. The specification always overrides the drawing, so leave both as they are.
  • C. The larger-scale drawing always overrides the specification, so leave both as they are.
  • D. Use the cheaper requirement and delete the other one.
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A

Why: Under A201 §1.2.1, the contract documents are complementary, and what one requires is binding as if all required it. There's no automatic drawing-versus-spec winner.

  • B and C invent a priority rule.
  • D swaps cost for design intent.

Other contracts or supplementary conditions can add a precedence clause, so this answer is tied to the stated setup. Sources: AIA A201-2017 preview, §1.2.1; AIA A503-2019 guide, commentary on §1.2.1.

Question 20 · Consultant Drawing Coordination · Multiple choice

A coordination overlay shows a duct and a display-support bracket in the same plan footprint. Both heights are measured from the same finished floor.

  • The duct occupies 118 to 130 inches.
  • The bracket occupies 116 to 122 inches.

What does this show?

  • A. A 2-inch vertical gap separates them.
  • B. A 12-inch gap separates them.
  • C. The duct's higher top elevation proves there's no conflict.
  • D. Their vertical ranges overlap by 4 inches.
Show answer and explanation

Answer: D

Why: The shared range runs from 118 inches (the higher bottom) to 122 inches (the lower top), which is a 4-inch overlap. The 2 inches in A is just the difference between their bottoms, not a gap. The 12 inches in B is the duct height, not a gap. Comparing only the tops, as in C, ignores the space each element fills. The overlap needs a coordinated fix, but the overlay doesn't tell you which element should move.

Check your results

Count correct answers by domain, then go back to every miss and every lucky guess. With three to six questions per domain, a score here points you toward a topic to review. It is not a measure of your readiness.

For this set, each numbered question counts once. A matching question is correct only when every placement is correct; there is no partial credit in this tally. Keep blank or incomplete responses separate from completed incorrect answers. These are practice-set rules, not CIDQ's scoring rules.

Check your results
DomainQuestions
I. Codes and Life Safety5, 9, 10
II. Integration and FF&E3, 8, 15, 16
III. Construction Documents2, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14
IV. Consultant Drawing Coordination1, 7, 17, 20
V. Construction Specifications and Schedules4, 18, 19

How to study each IDIX domain

Practice one habit across all five IDIX domains: connect a requirement to the drawing, schedule or spec that carries it out, then check that the documents agree. Each domain below has a method and a concrete thing to produce while you study.

Codes and Life Safety

Work every code question in the same order: context, then rule, then exception, then units, then check. Pin down the occupancy and exactly what's being asked before you touch a ratio.

Keep gross and net areas straight; the factor tells you which to use. Calculate mixed functions separately, then add them where egress paths combine (Question 9). Trace a route before you measure it, because the common path and the full travel distance are different lengths (Question 10). For plumbing, read the facility arrangement before you split the population (Question 5).

For accessibility, check whether the building is new or existing first. ICC A117.1-2017 sets bigger turning and clear-floor spaces for new buildings (Question 2).

CIDQ's blueprint FAQ says "life safety" covers more than this, including fire alarms, fire separation, fire suppression, flammability, slip resistance and toxicity. Candidates also need conceptual knowledge of ANSI, NEC and NFPA, and of when standards like ASHRAE, ASTM, BIFMA, ETL, OSHA and UL apply.

Produce: a one-line code-check record for each problem. Note the context, code section, inputs, result and what the result doesn't settle.

Integration and FF&E

Choosing something that looks right isn't the skill being tested. Documenting that it meets the project's actual criteria is. Build a small requirements-versus-evidence table covering dimensions, services, performance data and installation conditions, and eliminate options criterion by criterion (Questions 3 and 8).

Match the rating to the problem: NRC for absorption, STC for airborne isolation, IIC for impact (Question 15). Show takeoffs in whole buying units, not just area (Question 16).

Produce: a selection matrix that names the exact criterion each rejected option fails, and one takeoff with every rounding step visible.

Construction Documents

This is the heaviest domain at 32%, so give it the most practice time. Use the view that answers the question, then cross-check:

  • Plans locate things horizontally.
  • Elevations show a face and its heights.
  • Sections show what happens through a cut.
  • Details resolve one local condition.

Skills to drill:

  • Read heights from one shared datum (Question 6).
  • Add every layer in a stack (Question 12).
  • Follow a callout to the right detail and sheet (Question 11).
  • Catch a demolition marking that contradicts scope (Question 14).
  • Ask for listing evidence before assuming a changed assembly keeps its rating (Question 13).

Produce: an annotated drawing with the controlling dimensions and tags marked, plus one sentence naming the mismatch and the requirement behind it.

Consultant Drawing Coordination

Compare documents in a fixed order:

  1. Confirm you're looking at the same room, current revisions and a common datum.
  2. Compare locations and quantities.
  3. Log the issue and route it to the discipline the project assigns.

Matching room numbers don't prove a three-dimensional fit. Two elements can share a footprint and still clash in height (Question 20). Changed fixture counts ripple into other disciplines' schedules and circuits (Question 7).

Produce: an issue log with five columns: location, affected documents, conflicting values, responsible lead, and the evidence that would close the issue.

Construction Specifications and Schedules

Trace each requirement through its plan tag, schedule entry and spec section. A missing entry isn't permission to guess, and two entries that disagree have to be resolved, not picked between (Questions 4 and 19).

Know the three-part format: General, Products, Execution (Question 18). Know the main spec types too:

  • Descriptive specs describe the material.
  • Performance specs state results.
  • Reference-standard specs point to a published standard.
  • Proprietary specs name products. They're open if substitutions are allowed and closed if they're not.

Source: CSI, Specifying Methods—Proprietary Specifying 101.

Produce: one requirement traced from tag to schedule to spec clause, with any gaps flagged before issue.

Your 8-week IDIX study plan

Assumes: about five hours a week (five one-hour blocks) for eight weeks, or roughly 40 hours. This is our editorial plan, not a CIDQ requirement. It's built for someone who already works on construction documents. If your role is mostly schematic design or FF&E selection, stretch the Construction Documents weeks.

Your 8-week IDIX study plan
WeekFocusWhat to doOutput
1BaselineRead the IDIX blueprint and the exam code-section index. Do all 20 questions above without peeking. Try CIDQ's demo exam to learn the item types.Error log started; two topics needing review named
2Codes and Life SafetyIBC Chapter 10 (occupant load, exits, common path, travel distance, corridors). IPC Chapter 4 fixture counts. A117.1 Chapters 3–4 and 6, with new vs existing dimensions. Rework Questions 2, 5, 9 and 10.Three code-check records
3Construction Documents IConstruction plans, demolition plans, partition types, door types, RCPs (ceiling heights, transitions, lighting layouts, switching). Rework Question 14.One annotated plan and one RCP check
4Construction Documents IIElevations, sections and details: mounting heights, millwork, wall types by fire, acoustic and moisture needs, transitions, window and door details. Rework Questions 6, 11, 12 and 13.One annotated detail with every layer and reference checked
5Integration and FF&EBuilding systems behind finishes, finish plans, flooring transitions, furniture clearances, service coordination, takeoffs. Rework Questions 3, 8, 15 and 16.One selection matrix and one takeoff
6Consultant coordinationOverlay MEP, lighting and AV drawings. Cover power, data and communication plans, code-required signage and wayfinding. Rework Questions 1, 7, 17 and 20.One issue log
7Specs and schedulesThree-part format, spec types, specification divisions; door, hardware, finish, furniture, plumbing and room schedules. Rework Questions 4, 18 and 19.One requirement traced from tag to schedule to spec
8Mixed reviewRedo all 20 questions and explain each answer out loud, not just the letter. Revisit the two topics your error log flags most often. Practice pace: 240 minutes ÷ 130 questions is about 1.8 minutes per question; individual items will take different amounts of time.Clean error log; exam-day checklist done

Error log columns: question, what I chose, why it seemed right, the requirement or source I missed, the corrected method, and when I'll review it next. Tag each miss as one of these:

  • missed condition
  • wrong code edition
  • drawing-reference error
  • arithmetic or units
  • missing evidence
  • wrong role assumption

On a second pass, a better score may only mean you remember these questions. Explaining why is the real test.

If your exam is this month: compress the plan into the study time you have. Work through the 20 questions, then reread the domain sections behind your misses and lucky guesses. Learn the break and calculator rules below, and confirm your appointment details in your MyNCIDQ account.

How IDIX works on exam day

How IDIX works on exam day
ItemWhat CIDQ says
Phases coveredDesign development and construction documentation (blueprint)
Length130 questions, including 15 unscored pretest questions mixed in with the rest. 4 hours of testing time; the appointment runs 30 minutes longer for check-in, tutorial and survey (handbook, pp. 19, 23)
Item typesThree- and four-option multiple choice, drag and place, fill in the blank, hot spot; some questions include exhibits (handbook, p. 19). No case studies; scenario vignettes have 3–5 questions (blueprint FAQ, Q10–11)
Code basis2021 IBC, 2021 IRC, 2021 IPC and 2017 ICC A117.1, starting with the April 2026 administration (reference materials; code index)
Code text during the examCIDQ supplies a building-code reference document containing the listed sections, without the code images, as part of each exam question (code index, p. 1)
CalculatorOn-screen only. Handheld calculators only as an approved accommodation (handbook, p. 26)
BreaksNotify the proctor before a break. The clock keeps running, and you can't return to any question you've already viewed, flagged or not. Do not access a phone or study materials during the break (handbook, p. 26)
Scratch workScratch paper at a test center; an on-screen whiteboard if you test remotely (handbook, pp. 26–27)
WherePrometric test centers or ProProctor remote proctoring (handbook, p. 15)
WhenApril and October windows (handbook, p. 4)
ScoringScaled 200–800; 500 passes (About the Exams)
ResultsOfficial score reports about 6–8 weeks after the window closes, with a breakdown by content area (About the Exams)
Pass rate61% in Spring 2026, the first IDIX administration. Earlier rates in CIDQ's table are for PRAC (About the Exams)
Who can take itStandard education pathways require qualifying education plus 3,520 to 7,040 verified work hours, depending on the path. CIDQ also offers alternative review pathways (handbook, p. 6; CIDQ eligibility)

Exam eligibility is separate from a state or province's licensing or registration requirements; check the applicable jurisdiction through CIDQ's eligibility guidance.

Two of these rows change how you should study:

  • The code-reference images won't be there. The exam gives you the code text without its images, so learn the A117.1 clearance diagrams and dimension figures well enough to picture them. Practice working from code text, not from memorized tables. Individual exam questions can still include exhibits.
  • Breaks lock earlier questions. Before you step away, finish and review every question you've opened, because you can't go back to it afterward.

What changed from PRAC

  • Name and scope. PRAC is gone. IDIX covers design development and construction documentation only (About the Exams).
  • Format. No case studies. All three NCIDQ sections now use the same four item types, with short vignettes (blueprint FAQ).
  • Codes. The basis is now the 2021 I-Codes plus A117.1-2017. Watch for the larger new-building accessibility dimensions.
  • Dropped topics. BOMA calculations are no longer tested. CIDQ says you should still know high-level square-footage ideas like rentable vs usable area (FAQ Q7).

Older PRAC notes can still teach useful concepts. Organize your study around the current blueprint, though, not the old case-study structure.

IDIX FAQ

Is the IDIX open book? No books are allowed (handbook, p. 26). But CIDQ supplies a code-reference document with the listed code text, without its images, as part of each question. CIDQ's code index lists which chapters and sections, so study those.

I passed PRAC already. Do I need to take IDIX? CIDQ says sections you've already passed don't have to be retaken because the blueprints changed, as long as your exam application is still active (blueprint FAQ, Q13). If the applicable eligibility period expires before you complete the required sections, CIDQ's reapplication policy says passing scores are voided.

Do I have to take IDFX before IDIX? Once approved for the relevant sections, you can take them in any order. IDFX-only approval does not authorize an IDIX attempt; Route 2 candidates need the subsequent application and work experience (CIDQ application routes). If you prefer to follow the design phases, CIDQ notes the order is IDFX, then IDIX, then IDPX (blueprint FAQ, Q14).

Does CIDQ have IDIX practice questions? CIDQ's study materials page lists separate free practice-question links for IDFX and IDPX, but no separate IDIX practice-question link as checked October 13, 2026. It also links a demo exam for exploring item formats, the code index and a reference list. CIDQ doesn't create or endorse prep courses.

What about study materials passed around by other candidates? Use legitimate study materials, not recalled or reconstructed exam content. CIDQ's candidate agreement prohibits studying from exam content reconstructed from memory, and it requires candidates to report it (handbook, pp. 41–42 and 46).

Sources and independence

Exam facts on this page were last verified October 13, 2026, against these CIDQ documents:

Technical points in the practice questions rely on these:

All project data in the questions is fictional and supplied for the exercise. AI assistance was used in drafting and in this source-and-consistency check; this is not a credentialed professional review. See our methodology for the distinction.

Preparing for more than IDIX? See the NCIDQ exam prep guide.

To check eligibility or schedule, go to CIDQ directly: eligibility · scheduling.

By the Castleport Test Prep Editorial Team.

Castleport Test Prep is an independent exam prep publisher. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by or approved by the Council for Interior Design Qualification (CIDQ). NCIDQ, IDIX, IDFX and IDPX are used only to identify the exams they describe, and trademarks belong to their respective owners. The practice questions on this page are original and unofficial, not actual exam questions. Nothing here guarantees passing, certification or licensure.

NCIDQ IDIX Exam Prep: Free Study Guide + 20 Questions